Re: [HACKERS] cidr - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nick Bastin
Subject Re: [HACKERS] cidr
Date
Msg-id 35B4A728.24D94E8B@rbbsystems.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] cidr  (Paul A Vixie <vixie@vix.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] cidr  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Paul A Vixie wrote:
> > I like INET too.  It is up to you.
>
> How do folks feel about polymorphism between IPv4 and IPv6?  Should we (a)
> make it work (either by making internal_length=10 or going variable length)
> or (b) just make this thing IPv4 only and take care of IPv6 separately/later?

Making it IPv4 only just means we'll have to do it again later, and having
IPv6 functionality now would be good for those of us who are currently working
with IPv6 networks...

Nick Bastin
Systems Administrator
RBb Systems

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] next XID is in shmem now...
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cidr