Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 September 1998

• 00:15   configure problem Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:32   Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:41   Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:41   Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:27   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:41   Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Bruce Momjian
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Bruce Momjian
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Bruce Momjian
• 04:35   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 04:46   Re: [HACKERS] configure problem David Hartwig
• 05:00   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.u Bruce Momjian
• 05:20   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 05:21   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 05:24   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 05:49   I am done Bruce Momjian
• 07:23   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Keith Parks
• 07:26   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Keith Parks
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Thomas A. Szybist
• 15:20   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 17:13   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. David Hartwig
• 17:21   2 Troubles with (current) pgsql 6.4 (fwd) Michael Reifenberger
• 17:48   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 20:20   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.u Keith Parks
• 20:41   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.u Bruce Momjian
• 23:28   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Thomas G. Lockhart

2 September 1998

• 00:33   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 01:50   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 02:11   failed datetime regression tests Jon Buller
• 02:47   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 04:33   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Thomas G. Lockhart
• 09:17   Still big problem with 6.4 Michael Meskes
• 10:55   AW: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Andreas Zeugswetter
• 11:08   Adding PRIMARY KEY info darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 12:45   Release 6.4. where is it? Sferacarta Software
• 13:11   Re: [HACKERS] Adding PRIMARY KEY info Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:57   Re: [HACKERS] Adding PRIMARY KEY info Bruce Momjian
• 13:58   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 13:58   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 14:07   default values Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:38   Re: [HACKERS] default values Bruce Momjian
• 14:43   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.u Bruce Momjian
• 14:43   Re: [HACKERS] default values Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:51   Re: [HACKERS] default values Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:33   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.u Thomas A. Szybist
• 15:43   Re: [HACKERS] Release 6.4. where is it? The Hermit Hacker
• 15:45   Re: SQL package (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] Release 6.4. where is it? David Hartwig
• 16:00   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. David Hartwig
• 16:01   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. David Hartwig
• 17:31   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 20:02   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Keith Parks
• 20:31   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.] Bruce Momjian
• 20:46   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 22:11   Fix for initdb/indexing problems Bruce Momjian
• 22:18   Re: [HACKERS] USE_LOCALE and unsigned char * Bruce Momjian
• 22:28   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 HISTORY file Bruce Momjian
• 23:39   Re: [HACKERS] USE_LOCALE and unsigned char * t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
• 23:46   Re: [HACKERS] Fix for initdb/indexing problems Keith Parks

3 September 1998

• 00:13   Re: [HACKERS] Adding PRIMARY KEY info Vadim Mikheev
• 00:17   Re: default values Vadim Mikheev
• 01:08   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. David Hartwig
• 01:12   Re: [HACKERS] encoding problem Bruce Momjian
• 01:14   Re: [HACKERS] LinuxPPC problems Bruce Momjian
• 01:26   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 01:32   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 01:36   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:46   Re: [HACKERS] USE_LOCALE and unsigned char * Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:56   Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.] Bruce Momjian
• 03:21   index fix report Bruce Momjian
• 03:31   Re: [HACKERS] failed datetime regression tests Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:51   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:03   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:08   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Bruce Momjian
• 04:09   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Bruce Momjian
• 04:18   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Bruce Momjian
• 04:22   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:44   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:52   questionable code in heap_formtuple() Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:31   Re: [HACKERS] LinuxPPC problems Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:18   Re: [HACKERS] USE_LOCALE and unsigned char * Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:25   Re: [HACKERS] Fix for initdb/indexing problems Keith Parks
• 09:42   Index problems mummert&partner_meskesm@WestLB.de
• 09:42   Index problems mummert&partner_meskesm@WestLB.de
• 12:23   Re: [HACKERS] Fix for initdb/indexing problems Thomas A. Szybist
• 12:51   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report David Hartwig
• 12:56   regression test result on latest cvs - linux-x86 Oleg Bartunov
• 13:03   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] Adding PRIMARY KEY info darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report David Hartwig
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] Adding PRIMARY KEY info darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 13:58   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Bruce Momjian
• 14:21   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report David Hartwig
• 14:25   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas A. Szybist
• 14:37   Re: [HACKERS] Adding PRIMARY KEY info Bruce Momjian
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report David Hartwig
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] LinuxPPC problems Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] LinuxPPC problems Bruce Momjian
• 17:10   RE: [GENERAL] SET LOCK MODE ? Jackson, DeJuan
• 22:27   Patch for initdb Keith Parks

4 September 1998

• 00:17   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:25   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Bruce Momjian
• 02:04   Re: [HACKERS] Adding PRIMARY KEY info Vadim Mikheev
• 02:09   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Vadim Mikheev
• 02:43   Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Vadim Mikheev
• 02:50   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report David Hartwig
• 03:07   Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items David Hartwig
• 03:23   Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Vadim Mikheev
• 03:25   Minor bugs and a formatting gripe Tom Lane
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] Minor bugs and a formatting gripe Bruce Momjian
• 04:04   Re: [HACKERS] Minor bugs and a formatting gripe Bruce Momjian
• 04:19   Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items David Hartwig
• 04:23   Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Vadim Mikheev
• 04:30   Clean up prepkeyset.c David Hartwig
• 06:15   Subqueries? Aleksey Dashevsky
• 06:46   SPARC, SunOS 5.5.1, gcc 2.7.2.1 - can't compile... Vadim Mikheev
• 06:46   CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 06:56   Re: [HACKERS] Subqueries? Vadim Mikheev
• 07:24   Can PostgreSQL answer near-real-time demands? Metin Ozsavran
• 12:51   Re: [HACKERS] SPARC, SunOS 5.5.1, gcc 2.7.2.1 - can't compile... David Hartwig
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] Release 6.4 jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:30   Re: [HACKERS] SPARC, SunOS 5.5.1, gcc 2.7.2.1 - can't compile... The Hermit Hacker
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] SPARC, SunOS 5.5.1, gcc 2.7.2.1 - can't compile... Bruce Momjian
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] Subqueries? Bruce Momjian
• 13:32   Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers] Bruce Momjian
• 13:35   snprintf() The Hermit Hacker
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] Minor bugs and a formatting gripe Tom Lane
• 13:58   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers] The Hermit Hacker
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Bruce Momjian
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:57   Re: [HACKERS] Minor bugs and a formatting gripe Bruce Momjian
• 14:58   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers] Bruce Momjian
• 15:13   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Bruce Momjian
• 15:21   Re: [HACKERS] Release 6.4 David Hartwig
• 15:36   Re: hackers-digest V1 #954 Paul A Vixie
• 16:02   Re: [HACKERS] questionable code in heap_formtuple() Bruce Momjian
• 16:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: hackers-digest V1 #954 The Hermit Hacker
• 16:33   AW: [HACKERS] Release 6.4 Andreas Zeugswetter
• 16:51   Re: [HACKERS] questionable code in heap_formtuple()] Bruce Momjian
• 16:58   Re: [HACKERS] Re: hackers-digest V1 #954 Paul A Vixie
• 17:07   Re: [HACKERS] questionable code in heap_formtuple()] Bruce Momjian
• 17:16   Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers Bruce Momjian
• 17:18   Re: [HACKERS] Release 6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 17:21   Re: [HACKERS] questionable code in heap_formtuple() Bruce Momjian
• 17:25   Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers Paul A Vixie
• 17:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers The Hermit Hacker
• 17:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: hackers-digest V1 #954 darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 18:11   Open portability issues Andreas Zeugswetter
• 18:28   Re: [HACKERS] questionable code in heap_formtuple() David Hartwig
• 20:53   Re: [HACKERS] Open portability issues Brook Milligan
• 21:33   Problems in create table ?? 6.3.2 Dev_Al
• 23:33   MIN not defined for OID types Roland Roberts

5 September 1998

• 00:03   Re: [HACKERS] Open portability issues Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:09   Re: [HACKERS] Release 6.4 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:37   Re: [HACKERS] MIN not defined for OID types Bruce Momjian
• 04:22   Re: [HACKERS] MIN not defined for OID types Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] Adding PRIMARY KEY info Vadim Mikheev
• 09:32   Re: [HACKERS] Adding PRIMARY KEY info darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 10:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers Michael Meskes
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] MIN not defined for OID types Bruce Momjian
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] MIN not defined for OID types Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:28   new office webcam Bruce Momjian
• 17:27   Re: [HACKERS] MIN not defined for OID types Roland Roberts
• 17:27   Re: [HACKERS] MIN not defined for OID types Roland Roberts
• 17:50   Re: [HACKERS] MIN not defined for OID types Thomas G. Lockhart
• 20:35   Re: [HACKERS] MIN not defined for OID types Roland Roberts

6 September 1998

• 02:55   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
• 03:52   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Bruce Momjian
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:45   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report Bruce Momjian
• 04:47   my office cam Bruce Momjian
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] my office cam t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
• 14:46   SIGSEGV in 'select * from pg_user' Jeroen van Vianen
• 19:52   Field Level Locking Help??? Metin Ozsavran
• 23:38   Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in 'select * from pg_user' Thomas G. Lockhart

7 September 1998

• 04:37   Alignment fix Bruce Momjian
• 06:57   Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in 'select * from pg_user' Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:06   Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in 'select * from pg_user' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:09   Re: DELETE FROM TABLE doesn't work (AGAIN) Sferacarta Software
• 15:33   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: DELETE FROM TABLE doesn't work (AGAIN) Gerald Fischer
• 15:50   Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in 'select * from pg_user' Thomas G. Lockhart
• 18:16   Re: [HACKERS] Open portability issues Massimo Dal Zotto
• 18:21   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: DELETE FROM TABLE doesn't work (AGAIN) David Hartwig
• 19:12   Re: [HACKERS] my office cam Peter T Mount
• 19:37   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: DELETE FROM TABLE doesn't work (AGAIN) Gerald Fischer
• 21:14   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: DELETE FROM TABLE doesn't work (AGAIN) David Hartwig
• 21:29   Macro From Hell David Hartwig
• 22:36   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: DELETE FROM TABLE doesn't work (AGAIN) Stephen Davies
• 23:33   Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix Thomas G. Lockhart

8 September 1998

• 05:44   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug and HAVING problems... Vadim Mikheev
• 06:22   Re: [HACKERS] Macro From Hell Bruce Momjian
• 06:40   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug and HAVING problems... Andreas Zeugswetter
• 06:42   Re: [HACKERS] Macro From Hell Billy G. Allie
• 07:06   Problem with the constraints test and PRIMARY KEY on UnixWare 7. Billy G. Allie
• 07:07   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: DELETE FROM TABLE doesn't work (AGAIN) Gerald Fischer
• 07:29   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug and HAVING problems... Vadim Mikheev
• 11:36   Re[2]: [INTERFACES] Re: DELETE FROM TABLE doesn't work (AGAIN) Sferacarta Software
• 12:05   Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 13:23   Re: [HACKERS] Macro From Hell Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:26   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: DELETE FROM TABLE doesn't work (AGAIN) David Hartwig
• 13:30   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with the constraints test and PRIMARY KEY on UnixWare 7. Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:02   Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Billy G. Allie
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] Macro From Hell Bruce Momjian
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] Macro From Hell David Hartwig
• 14:09   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with the constraints test and PRIMARY KEY on UnixWare 7. David Hartwig
• 14:24   Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers Bruce Momjian
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] Macro From Hell Bruce Momjian
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] Macro From Hell Bruce Momjian
• 15:44   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with the constraints test and PRIMARY KEY on UnixWare 7. Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:36   Re: [HACKERS] Macro From Hell David Hartwig
• 16:36   Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers Paul A Vixie
• 17:06   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with the constraints test and PRIMARY KEY on UnixWare 7. David Hartwig
• 17:18   Re: [HACKERS] Macro From Hell dg@informix.com (David Gould)
• 18:35   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report David Hartwig
• 21:30   Re: [HACKERS] Macro From Hell Bruce Momjian

9 September 1998

• 02:21   Indixing problems... Vadim Mikheev
• 03:05   Re: [HACKERS] index fix report David Hartwig
• 03:07   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:27   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Bruce Momjian
• 05:10   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:13   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Vadim Mikheev
• 05:16   Would you let me know how ? geo
• 05:18   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Vadim Mikheev
• 05:41   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:13   AW: [HACKERS] index fix report Andreas Zeugswetter
• 06:27   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Andreas Zeugswetter
• 12:05   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... David Hartwig
• 12:09   new return value of PQfsize Edmund Mergl
• 13:06   Re: [HACKERS] new return value of PQfsize Tom Lane
• 13:14   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Tom Lane
• 14:10   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:31   regression test errors: netbsd 1.3.2/i386 Brook Milligan
• 17:09   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Bruce Momjian
• 17:09   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Bruce Momjian
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] Patch for initdb Bruce Momjian
• 17:17   inx problem fixe Michael Meskes
• 17:26   Re: [HACKERS] Adding PRIMARY KEY info Bruce Momjian
• 17:32   Re: [HACKERS] Open portability issues Bruce Momjian
• 17:47   Re: Open portability issues Bruce Momjian
• 19:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Open portability issues Brook Milligan
• 20:18   vlen in libpq using user defined data type David Hartwig
• 20:42   Re: [HACKERS] vlen in libpq using user defined data type Bruce Momjian
• 22:06   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Patch for initdb Keith Parks

10 September 1998

• 00:19   Re: [HACKERS] regression test errors: netbsd 1.3.2/i386 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:54   Re: [HACKERS] Patch for initdb Thomas G. Lockhart
• 02:05   fix for libpq choking on varlen fields Tom Lane
• 02:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Open portability issues The Hermit Hacker
• 02:35   added long long to BSDI Bruce Momjian
• 03:47   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Billy G. Allie
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] added long long to BSDI Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:03   Re: [HACKERS] added long long to BSDI Bruce Momjian
• 04:04   open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
• 04:08   Re: [HACKERS] added long long to BSDI Billy G. Allie
• 04:28   Re: [HACKERS] added long long to BSDI Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:36   Re: [HACKERS] added long long to BSDI Bruce Momjian
• 04:54   Re: [HACKERS] open 6.4 items Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:30   6.4 items Bruce Momjian
• 05:30   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... Vadim Mikheev
• 05:30   Re: [HACKERS] open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
• 05:34   Re: [HACKERS] open 6.4 items Peter T Mount
• 05:48   Running configure / port to Windows NT Joost Kraaijeveld
• 06:48   Re: Open portability issues Andreas Zeugswetter
• 10:20   Documentation error... James Olin Oden
• 11:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Open portability issues Andreas Zeugswetter
• 12:38   Re: [HACKERS] open 6.4 items Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:15   Re: [HACKERS] Running configure / port to Windows NT The Hermit Hacker
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] vlen in libpq using user defined data type Tom Lane
• 13:30   Re: [HACKERS] open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
• 14:18   Re: [HACKERS] fix for libpq choking on varlen fields Bruce Momjian
• 14:24   more on int8 Daniel Kalchev
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] open 6.4 items Vadim Mikheev
• 15:28   Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 Bruce Momjian
• 15:30   Re: [HACKERS] vlen in libpq using user defined data type David Hartwig
• 15:38   Re: [HACKERS] open 6.4 items darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 16:06   Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:10   Re: [HACKERS] open 6.4 items Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:44   Re: [HACKERS] open 6.4 items Vadim Mikheev
• 16:58   Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 Bruce Momjian
• 17:00   Re: [HACKERS] open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
• 17:00   Porting postgreSQL to Windows NT Joost Kraaijeveld
• 17:21   Missing headers Windows NT port Joost Kraaijeveld
• 17:54   Re: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port Bruce Momjian
• 18:13   pg_user crash Bruce Momjian
• 19:00   pg_user backtrace -- with ElectricFence (looks useful :) Taral
• 19:07   RE: pg_user backtrace -- with ElectricFence (looks useful :) Taral
• 19:10   pg_user backtrace -- with ElectricFence (looks useful :) Taral
• 20:30   Re: [HACKERS] vlen in libpq using user defined data type David Hartwig
• 22:13   Re: [HACKERS] regression test errors: netbsd 1.3.2/i386 Brook Milligan
• 22:16   Re: [HACKERS] regression test errors: netbsd 1.3.2/i386 Brook Milligan
• 22:48   Re: [HACKERS] regression test errors: netbsd 1.3.2/i386 Bruce Momjian

11 September 1998

• 00:28   Re: [HACKERS] pg_user crash Vadim Mikheev
• 04:13   getting "fe_setauthsvc: invalid name" error Midwest Online
• 04:16   Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:15   Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 Bruce Momjian
• 06:10   Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 Daniel Kalchev
• 07:37   Names that suddenly include an OID Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 07:54   [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 08:08   AW: [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID Andreas Zeugswetter
• 08:15   AW: [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID Andreas Zeugswetter
• 13:02   pg_user problem Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:13   Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 Bruce Momjian
• 13:16   Re: [INTERFACES] getting "fe_setauthsvc: invalid name" error Tom Lane
• 13:22   Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 Brook Milligan
• 13:30   Re: [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID Bruce Momjian
• 13:40   Re: [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID Bruce Momjian
• 13:44   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID Bruce Momjian
• 13:54   RE: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port Magnus Hagander
• 14:19   Re: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port Bruce Momjian
• 14:50   6.4 fixes. Billy G. Allie
• 14:51   RE: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port Joost Kraaijeveld
• 14:57   Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:17   Re: [HACKERS] pg_user problem Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:39   pgrewrite: was Re: [HACKERS] pg_user problem Bruce Momjian
• 15:40   Re: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port Bruce Momjian
• 16:01   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 fixes. Bruce Momjian
• 16:04   Postgres compiled on Windopws NT Joost Kraaijeveld
• 16:08   Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 Bruce Momjian
• 16:30   Re: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port David Hartwig
• 16:41   High level description of postgres Joost Kraaijeveld
• 16:45   RE: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port Joost Kraaijeveld
• 17:04   Re: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port J. Michael Roberts
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port Bruce Momjian
• 18:30   Re: [HACKERS] High level description of postgres Bruce Momjian
• 19:30   Serial Data Type David Hartwig

12 September 1998

• 00:16   postgreSQL 6.4 patches. Billy G. Allie
• 00:25   SERIAL data type t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
• 00:25   Re: pgrewrite: was Re: [HACKERS] pg_user problem t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] Serial Data Type darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 01:14   Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL data type darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 01:47   Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL data type Billy G. Allie
• 02:24   Porting effort and patches for the Irix port for PostgreSQL Robert Bruccoleri
• 04:23   Re: [HACKERS] pg_user problem Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:57   Re: [HACKERS] Serial Data Type Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:11   Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL data type Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:56   Exception in select IN with index Keith Parks
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] Exception in select IN with index Thomas A. Szybist
• 15:04   Re: [HACKERS] postgreSQL 6.4 patches. Bruce Momjian
• 15:11   Re: Porting effort and patches for the Irix port for PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 15:38   Re: [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] Names that suddenly include an OID Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 18:24   AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Oleg Bartunov
• 19:52   Re: [HACKERS] Exception in select IN with index Keith Parks

13 September 1998

• 02:20   postgreSQL 6.4 patches Billy G. Allie
• 03:02   Re: [HACKERS] postgreSQL 6.4 patches Bruce Momjian
• 03:37   ERROR: cannot create index Gene Selkov Jr.
• 04:06   libpq++ shared library missing? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:27   Re: [HACKERS] AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Serial Data Type David Hartwig
• 15:43   Re: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port The Hermit Hacker
• 17:44   Re: [HACKERS] AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Bruce Momjian
• 19:08   Re: [HACKERS] AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Oleg Bartunov
• 19:14   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ shared library missing? Billy G. Allie
• 19:28   crash on new system views Bruce Momjian
• 23:16   Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 Jon Buller
• 23:50   Re: [HACKERS] Serial Data Type darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)

14 September 1998

• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:52   Re: [HACKERS] AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Bruce Momjian
• 00:55   Re: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:17   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:25   Re: [HACKERS] AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Oleg Bartunov
• 02:02   Re: [HACKERS] AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:44   BETA1 Snapshot built... The Hermit Hacker
• 04:24   Re: [HACKERS] BETA1 Snapshot built... Egon Schmid
• 08:48   Re: [HACKERS] Also on SVR4 (Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532) Frank Ridderbusch
• 09:06   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 prlw1@cam.ac.uk (Patrick Welche)
• 12:32   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] Also on SVR4 (Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:11   Re: [HACKERS] BETA1 Snapshot built... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:22   Re: [HACKERS] BETA1 Snapshot built... The Hermit Hacker
• 13:39   Query: Extensible Tuple Sizes? Integration
• 14:46   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 Henry B. Hotz
• 18:09   RE: [HACKERS] BETA1 Snapshot built... Vince Vielhaber
• 20:28   Row-level locking Brian Sanders
• 20:35   Re: [HACKERS] BETA1 Snapshot built... darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 20:50   Re: [HACKERS] BETA1 Snapshot built... Vince Vielhaber
• 23:03   RE: [HACKERS] Query: Extensible Tuple Sizes? Stupor Genius
• 23:20   Regress results on FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE Vince Vielhaber

15 September 1998

• 01:03   Re: [HACKERS] Also on SVR4 (Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532) Tom Lane
• 02:27   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 Jon Buller
• 02:48   ... Chandrashekar T S (MICO/PPI9)
• 03:18   subscribe steveoc@iweb.net.au
• 03:40   Describe command Michael Meskes
• 03:40   Fetch command Michael Meskes
• 03:40   Fetch again Michael Meskes
• 03:40   Re: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port Michael Meskes
• 03:40   ecpg patches Michael Meskes
• 10:23   Regress results on FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE - RESEND Vince Vielhaber
• 10:26   a query to crash the backend t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
• 10:31   configure autodetection problem Daniel Kalchev
• 10:48   perl vs perl5 Daniel Kalchev
• 11:41   Re: [HACKERS] perl vs perl5 The Hermit Hacker
• 13:03   Re[2]: [HACKERS] SERIAL data type Sferacarta Software
• 13:36   Re: [HACKERS] crash on new system views Keith Parks
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] crash on new system views Bruce Momjian
• 17:12   Re: [HACKERS] crash on new system views Keith Parks
• 17:36   Re: [HACKERS] crash on new system views Bruce Momjian
• 17:48   6.4-BETA1: libpgtcl.so / Tcl version? Karl Eichwalder
• 17:50   Serial syntax darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 18:00   Re: [HACKERS] crash on new system views Bruce Momjian
• 18:18   Re: [HACKERS] Found it. Also on SVR4 (Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD... Frank Ridderbusch
• 18:52   query crashes backend - cvs Oleg Bartunov
• 21:12   Re: [HACKERS] Regress results on FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE - RESEND The Hermit Hacker
• 21:15   Re: [HACKERS] crash on new system views The Hermit Hacker

16 September 1998

• 02:33   Re: [HACKERS] query crashes backend - cvs Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:27   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4-BETA1: libpgtcl.so / Tcl version? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] Serial syntax Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:54   'select @1' problem Taral
• 04:14   Re: [HACKERS] query crashes backend - cvs Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:18   Re: [HACKERS] Serial syntax Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:33   Re: [HACKERS] 'select @1' problem Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:00   Re: [HACKERS] BETA1 Snapshot built... Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:55   Re: [HACKERS] query crashes backend - cvs Oleg Bartunov
• 07:08   Re: [HACKERS] crash on new system views Andreas Zeugswetter
• 11:01   Re: [HACKERS] BETA1 Snapshot built... Bruce Momjian
• 11:03   Re: [HACKERS] crash on new system views The Hermit Hacker
• 12:16   Re[3]: [HACKERS] SERIAL data type Sferacarta Software
• 12:28   AW: [HACKERS] crash on new system views Andreas Zeugswetter
• 13:18   Re: [HACKERS] 6.4-BETA1: libpgtcl.so / Tcl version? Tom Lane
• 14:15   Serial syntax, DEFAULT NULL, and rules Thomas G. Lockhart
• 19:08   geometry-NetBSD.out patch Brook Milligan
• 19:25   union regression test Brook Milligan
• 20:07   Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Tom Lane
• 20:36   Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) Robson Miranda

17 September 1998

• 00:54   Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:08   Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Bruce Momjian
• 09:36   Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:58   Re: NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 715 Jose' Soares
• 13:23   Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Brook Milligan
• 14:57   Re: [GENERAL] Re: NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 715 Bruce Momjian
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 715 Bruce Momjian
• 15:49   yacc problems Daniel Kalchev
• 15:55   syntax error Daniel Kalchev
• 16:05   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) Michael Meskes
• 16:11   Re: [HACKERS] yacc problems Michael Meskes
• 17:05   Re: [HACKERS] syntax error Michael Meskes
• 18:45   Re: [HACKERS] yacc problems Bruce Momjian
• 21:15   Re: [INTERFACES] Odbc parser error Byron Nikolaidis
• 22:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Odbc parser error Billy G. Allie

18 September 1998

• 02:29   oid8types() borken? Christopher Oliver
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] oid8types() borken? Bruce Momjian
• 04:20   Re: [HACKERS] pg_user backtrace -- with ElectricFence (looks useful :) Bruce Momjian
• 04:32   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 Bruce Momjian
• 05:28   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 dg@informix.com (David Gould)
• 08:43   ecpg docs Michael Meskes
• 09:48   BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend Zsolt Varga
• 11:54   Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend Sferacarta Software
• 12:14   Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL syntax question Sferacarta Software
• 12:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Odbc parser error Byron Nikolaidis
• 14:10   PL/pgsql David Hartwig
• 15:32   Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL syntax question Bruce Momjian
• 15:48   Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgsql Bruce Momjian
• 16:12   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 Bruce Momjian
• 16:19   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 Bruce Momjian
• 17:02   [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Christopher Oliver
• 17:10   Serial Data Type Failure David Hartwig
• 18:58   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] J. Michael Roberts
• 19:57   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian
• 20:47   Re: [HACKERS] geometry-NetBSD.out patch Bruce Momjian
• 23:00   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 Jon Buller
• 23:06   Re: [HACKERS] Compiling 6.4 on NetBSD-current/pc532 dg@informix.com (David Gould)

19 September 1998

• 01:40   RE: [HACKERS] pg_user backtrace -- with ElectricFence (looks useful :) Taral
• 03:00   Re: [HACKERS] pg_user backtrace -- with ElectricFence (looks useful :) Bruce Momjian
• 04:14   select not b from t1 -- electric fence Taral
• 11:17   Windows NT port of Postgres Joost Kraaijeveld
• 12:19   Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend Zsolt Varga
• 13:26   My patches Michael Meskes

20 September 1998

• 00:58   Regression results from HPUX 9/PA-RISC Tom Lane
• 02:50   Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Robert Bruccoleri
• 03:38   UnixWare 7 vacuum failures on the regression database. Billy G. Allie
• 03:45   SQL Triggers darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 10:33   Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... (fwd) Michael Reifenberger
• 16:23   BSDI 2.1, postgresql-6.3.2 HELP!!! Christopher Akritides
• 17:51   current- crash Michael Reifenberger
• 18:37   Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Oleg Bartunov
• 22:25   Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Thomas G. Lockhart
• 22:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 715 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 23:19   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 23:25   Re: [HACKERS] Windows NT port of Postgres Thomas G. Lockhart
• 23:49   Re: Serial Data Type Failure Thomas G. Lockhart
• 23:54   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Christopher Oliver

21 September 1998

• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] query crashes backend - cvs Bruce Momjian
• 00:48   Version numbers (was Re: [PATCHES] Several libpgtcl fixes) Tom Lane
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] query crashes backend - cvs Bruce Momjian
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) Bruce Momjian
• 01:25   Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Bruce Momjian
• 01:25   Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 01:25   Re: [HACKERS] Windows NT port of Postgres Bruce Momjian
• 01:27   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian
• 01:28   Open 6.4 Items Bruce Momjian
• 01:36   Re: [HACKERS] query crashes backend - cvs (fwd) Oleg Bartunov
• 02:29   Re: [HACKERS] Version numbers (was Re: [PATCHES] Several libpgtcl fixes) Bruce Momjian
• 02:32   yet another query to crash the backend Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:17   Re: [HACKERS] yet another query to crash the backend Bruce Momjian
• 03:31   Re: [HACKERS] yet another query to crash the backend Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:10   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:39   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Christopher Oliver
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Serial Data Type Failure Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:55   Re: My patches The Hermit Hacker
• 05:03   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) The Hermit Hacker
• 05:07   Re: [HACKERS] Version numbers (was Re: [PATCHES] Several libpgtcl fixes) The Hermit Hacker
• 05:42   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Oleg Bartunov
• 10:08   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian
• 10:08   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian
• 10:31   Re: [HACKERS] query crashes backend - cvs Bruce Momjian
• 11:37   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian
• 13:58   Errors inside transactions Tom Lane
• 14:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 715 Jose' Soares
• 14:05   ... jkraai
• 14:07   ... jkraai
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Brook Milligan
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] oid8types() borken? Bruce Momjian
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] Errors inside transactions Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:55   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) Michael Graff
• 15:22   Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Brook Milligan
• 15:22   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] J. Michael Roberts
• 15:39   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:47   Re: [HACKERS] Errors inside transactions Tom Lane
• 16:04   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:43   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 18:05   Foreign Keys: check_primary_function Anand Surelia
• 19:38   Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Brook Milligan
• 19:42   regress[ion].* files? Brook Milligan
• 22:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Odbc parser error Herouth Maoz
• 23:50   Re: [HACKERS] regress[ion].* files? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:54   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] The Hermit Hacker
• 23:56   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] The Hermit Hacker

22 September 1998

• 02:55   Re: NOT boolfield kills backend Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:02   Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian
• 05:46   Re: [HACKERS] Errors inside transactions Andreas Zeugswetter
• 08:16   Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Jose' Soares
• 12:49   Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:02   Re: [HACKERS] oid8types() borken? t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
• 15:20   Re: [HACKERS] Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:42   Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 15:53   Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Bruce Momjian
• 15:53   Re: [HACKERS] regress[ion].* files? Bruce Momjian
• 18:31   Re: NOT boolfield kills backend Bruce Momjian
• 19:01   Re: [HACKERS] oid8types() borken? Bruce Momjian
• 19:01   Re: Problem dropping databases Bruce Momjian
• 19:02   Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Bruce Momjian
• 20:24   Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Michael Reifenberger
• 20:46   Re: [HACKERS] select not b from t1 -- electric fence Bruce Momjian
• 20:46   Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend Bruce Momjian
• 20:46   funny comment Bruce Momjian
• 20:46   Re: NOT boolfield kills backend Bruce Momjian
• 21:01   Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Bruce Momjian

23 September 1998

• 00:30   Re: NOT boolfield kills backend Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
• 01:00   Re: NOT boolfield kills backend Bruce Momjian
• 01:21   Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 Items Nick Bastin
• 01:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 01:34   Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 Items Bruce Momjian
• 02:03   Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 Items Nick Bastin
• 02:13   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
• 06:56   datetime questions and fix to dt.c t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
• 09:11   pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Keith Parks
• 09:14   pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Keith Parks
• 09:57   pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Keith Parks
• 11:54   Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Chris Johnson
• 12:46   Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Sferacarta Software
• 13:28   default rights of new users maloune
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) rmiranda@iname.com
• 14:25   Re: [SQL] Question re: null Sferacarta Software
• 16:09   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian
• 16:17   Recursive Unions Michael Meskes
• 16:17   Problem on TODO list Michael Meskes
• 16:48   Re: [HACKERS] Problem on TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 16:52   Re: [HACKERS] datetime questions and fix to dt.c Bruce Momjian
• 17:18   Re: [HACKERS] Problem on TODO list Michael Meskes
• 20:01   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Keith Parks
• 20:04   Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples Tom Lane
• 20:32   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian
• 21:23   Re: [HACKERS] Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples Bruce Momjian
• 22:20   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Keith Parks

24 September 1998

• 00:13   RE: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Taral
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian
• 01:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:59   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:08   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:44   bug on CHAR_LENGTH function ? Jose' Soares
• 07:57   Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:22   fix for multi-byte partial truncating Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Jose' Soares
• 12:20   ... Theo Kramer
• 12:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Problem dropping databases Sferacarta Software
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:51   Re: [HACKERS] bug on CHAR_LENGTH function ? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:56   configure... Matthew C. Aycock
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers David Hartwig
• 17:26   Can slock_t ever be unaligned? Tom Lane

25 September 1998

• 00:47   Re: [HACKERS] fix for multi-byte partial truncating Bruce Momjian
• 01:33   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:43   Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) Vadim Mikheev
• 02:38   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian
• 02:53   unfortunately... Vadim Mikheev
• 03:49   Re: [HACKERS] unfortunately... Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:08   PL/pgSQL Makefile (was: Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:04   Re: [HACKERS] fix for multi-byte partial truncating Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:30   Re: [HACKERS] crash on new system views jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:18   Re: [HACKERS] unfortunately... The Hermit Hacker
• 13:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:53   Installation instructions Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:48   Re: [HACKERS] unfortunately... Bruce Momjian
• 14:50   Re: PL/pgSQL Makefile (was: Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers) Bruce Momjian
• 14:51   Re: [HACKERS] fix for multi-byte partial truncating Bruce Momjian
• 14:53   Re: [DOCS] Installation instructions Bruce Momjian
• 16:01   Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 16:08   Re: unfortunately... darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 16:48   Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:54   RE: [PHP3] [OFF-TOPIC] POSTGRES Jackson, DeJuan
• 21:18   How to destroy your entire Postgres installation Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] How to destroy your entire Postgres installation Nick Bastin
• 22:36   Re: [HACKERS] How to destroy your entire Postgres installation Tom Lane

26 September 1998

• 08:54   functional indexes Daniel Kalchev
• 20:18   NOTIFY interlock broken (was Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples) Tom Lane
• 21:03   Re: [HACKERS] NOTIFY interlock broken (was Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples) Bruce Momjian

27 September 1998

• 00:05   Think we need major revisions in async.c... Tom Lane
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] Think we need major revisions in async.c... Bruce Momjian
• 20:34   It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Tom Lane

28 September 1998

• 02:27   spinlock code for ns32k (again) Jon Buller
• 03:06   LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:13   subscribe Stan Thomas
• 06:59   rewrite rules patch jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 07:31   RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander
• 13:29   Proper cleanup at backend exit Tom Lane
• 15:44   Re: [HACKERS] Think we need major revisions in async.c... Massimo Dal Zotto
• 15:51   Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Massimo Dal Zotto
• 15:52   Little parser question jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:04   Re: [HACKERS] Proper cleanup at backend exit Massimo Dal Zotto
• 17:04   Re: [HACKERS] Proper cleanup at backend exit Tom Lane
• 17:10   Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Tom Lane
• 18:16   Re: [HACKERS] Think we need major revisions in async.c... Tom Lane
• 21:02   Fix for pg_views/pg_rules and new system views jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:55   RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:27   RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Vince Vielhaber

29 September 1998

• 00:43   RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:32   SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98 Robert Bruccoleri
• 03:29   Re: [HACKERS] Little parser question Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:41   pg_dump Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:28   ecpg parser Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:25   PL/pgSQL in template1? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:03   Patch - please apply jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:09   RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Vince Vielhaber
• 11:08   RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander
• 11:25   RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander
• 11:40   Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply The Hermit Hacker
• 11:53   rules ON SELECT jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:55   Re: Antwort: [HACKERS] ecpg parser Thomas G. Lockhart
• 11:55   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump Tom Lane
• 12:02   Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:32   RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Taral
• 13:51   SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan
• 14:01   Re: SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98 Robert Bruccoleri
• 15:45   Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:49   Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? David Hartwig
• 16:01   RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan
• 16:14   Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:34   Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? Keith Parks

30 September 1998

• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:53   Patches for gram.y and keywords.c Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:08   Re: Antwort: [HACKERS] ecpg parser Michael Meskes
• 07:02   Windows NT port: what file are created by initdb? Joost Kraaijeveld
• 11:09   Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jose' Soares
• 12:47   initdb question Joost Kraaijeveld
• 14:28   RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan
• 14:46   RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan
• 15:08   Make error in current cvs. Jackson, DeJuan
• 15:18   ... Sergio Brandano
• 15:43   Re: [HACKERS] Make error in current cvs. jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:47   RE: [HACKERS] Make error in current cvs. Jackson, DeJuan
• 16:27   6.4 beta crashed backend Marcus Mascari
• 21:28   backend crashes under 6.4beta Marcus Mascari