Re: [HACKERS] vlen in libpq using user defined data type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Hartwig
Subject Re: [HACKERS] vlen in libpq using user defined data type
Date
Msg-id 35F83EAF.94F7410@insightdist.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] vlen in libpq using user defined data type  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Problem resolve.  Hacker malfunction.

David Hartwig wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > David Hartwig <daveh@insightdist.com> writes:
> > > Anyway, as pqlib reads the string sent to it by the backend (a la psql),
> > > it must first read the length of each string.  The problem is that the
> > > length of the string for accntnum in some outrageously large number
> > > which ultimately hangs psql.  BTW,  atttypemod = -1 and typlen = 4 in
> > > the FE.
> >
> > Is this fixed by the patch I sent in last night?  Your description does
> > not sound like what I would expect.  The bug I fixed was that PQfsize()
> > would return 65535 instead of -1 for a varlen field.  But neither libpq
> > nor psql make use of that value (which is why I hadn't noticed it was
> > broken).  Are you using some other frontend code that does depend on
> > PQfsize to return the right thing?
> >
>
> I am using psql.   I put some debug statements in libpq get this far.   If I
> didn't mention it earlier, I put some log messages in my output function and
> it shows no problems.  All the other functionality of my date type seems to
> work.   Specifically, the index look up via the WHERE clause, and the input
> function. work fine,
>
> I just tried the patch without success.    I didn't think this was my problem
> but it was worth a try.   Hacking away...
>
> Does anyone know where (and/or how) the PQfsize is derived in the backend?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Taral"
Date:
Subject: pg_user backtrace -- with ElectricFence (looks useful :)
Next
From: Brook Milligan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression test errors: netbsd 1.3.2/i386