Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] more on int8
Date
Msg-id 199809110614.CAA21946@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] more on int8  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] more on int8
Re: [HACKERS] more on int8
List pgsql-hackers
> > > > I tried the int8 type under BSD/OS, running 6.3.2 (contrib/int8).
> > > > There the %Ld type is unimplemented and %lld or %qd both work.
> > I am running BSD/OS here, and configure recoginizes it with %qd.
>
> Just out of curiosity, does Bruce's BSDI system recognize %lld as did
> Daniel's? If so, we could dispense with the %qd option for the final
> release...

Yes, BSDI understands %lld, but not %Ld, though it is not documented in
the printf manual page.

We could probably do without %qd, but I assume their are some platforms
that support %qd and not %lld.  We can ask people as they run configure
if they ever see %lld failing but %qd passing.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more on int8
Next
From: Daniel Kalchev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more on int8