Re: [HACKERS] more on int8 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] more on int8
Date
Msg-id 35F8B1DF.3EF32011@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] more on int8  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] more on int8  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > > I tried the int8 type under BSD/OS, running 6.3.2 (contrib/int8).
> > > There the %Ld type is unimplemented and %lld or %qd both work.
> I am running BSD/OS here, and configure recoginizes it with %qd.

Just out of curiosity, does Bruce's BSDI system recognize %lld as did
Daniel's? If so, we could dispense with the %qd option for the final
release...

                    - Tom

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Midwest Online
Date:
Subject: getting "fe_setauthsvc: invalid name" error
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more on int8