> I had included float8 in this particular regression test to exercise the
> int4->float8 "promotion" since float8 is a "preferred type". Don't know
> why float4 should in general have different or better behavior than
> float8 wrt conversions and rounding; you may just be lucky on your
> platform.
In fact, float4 normally has much _worse_ floating point portability
than float8.
float4 can't seem to get even simple number right.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
http://www.op.net/~candle | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 853-3000(h)
+ Christ can be your backup. |