Re: [HACKERS] unfortunately... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] unfortunately...
Date
Msg-id 199809251548.LAA04205@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to unfortunately...  (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I don't like implementation of referential integrity constraints
> in contrib/spi/refint.* and implementation of ... unique indices:
> backend checks constraints when tuple is changed.
>
> Oracle checks constraints after entire _statement_ is done.
> Do you remember this:
>
> vac=> create table x (a int unique);
> NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE/UNIQUE will create implicit index x_a_key for table x
> CREATE
> vac=> insert into x values (1);
> INSERT 143852 1
> vac=> insert into x values (2);
> INSERT 143853 1
> vac=> update x set a = a + 1;
> ERROR:  Cannot insert a duplicate key into a unique index
>
> This is simplest case. Keeping in mind triggers
> I would like to see Oracle behaviour some day and so
> I decided to do not implement FOREIGN keys in 6.4 -:((

OK.  Removed from open 6.4 items list.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Installation instructions
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL Makefile (was: Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers)