Re: [HACKERS] union regression test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] union regression test
Date
Msg-id 36058EE6.AFBE880B@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] union regression test  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] union regression test  (Brook Milligan <brook@trillium.NMSU.Edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> If the float8 data type works better, we should make a float8 table
> that is uniform across platforms in order to test the union code.
> There is really no point in including the boundary cases of float8
> into a test of union.
> Perhaps a better solution is to insert into the union.sql code a
> float8 table creation, fill it with well-behaved data, and then use
> that table in the union test.

Yes, this is the best solution. Would you like to take a crack at it? I
can consolidate a patch and patch results on my machine (which has been
the nominal "truth" machine for the last few releases).

                   - Tom

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] current- crash
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 715