Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 199809221641.MAA17213@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL  (Robert Bruccoleri <bruc@pluto.njcc.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Dear Bruce,
>
> >
> > > At this point the Irix port is nearly complete. There are two problems
> > > that remain.
> > >
> > > First, the snprintf function does not process the %lld format
> > > correctly. Frankly, there is no reason to use it in
> > > src/backend/utils/adt/int8.c because there is not chance of exceeding
> > > the supplied buffer.  sprintf is safe in this circumstance and works
> > > correctly.
> >
> > Are you talking about the Irix snprintf, our our ports/snprintf.c?
>
> Irix doesn't have snprintf, so I'm talking about your ports. They
> are missing %lld formats.

OK, we need our ports snprintf() to understand %lld.  Marc?

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
http://www.op.net/~candle              |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 853-3000(h)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem dropping databases
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] union regression test