Re: unfortunately... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Subject Re: unfortunately...
Date
Msg-id m0zMbLb-00006FC@druid.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to unfortunately...  (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thus spake Vadim Mikheev
> I decided to do not implement FOREIGN keys in 6.4 -:((

Does this mean that we also won't have full primary key support?  It
seems to me like it could be implemented without worrying about foreign
keys but you know better.  I can work around it given the support
already there but it would be nice if making a field primary would
automatically set the relevant indisprimary field right now.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers
Next
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers