RE: [PHP3] [OFF-TOPIC] POSTGRES - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Jackson, DeJuan |
---|---|
Subject | RE: [PHP3] [OFF-TOPIC] POSTGRES |
Date | |
Msg-id | F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F42E2ED@cpsmail Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: [HACKERS] RE: [PHP3] [OFF-TOPIC] POSTGRES
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
CC'd to the PostgreSQL Hackers list. I performed the same test as Brian on the cvs version of 6.4 and it exhibits the same behavior. could we get a fix in for the release. -DEJ > Hehehe... > > Try using the "*", as I posted to your early send... see if it makes > any > difference. Doing a like '*' will search for the character '*'; > > er sorry about that last "early send" message... > > > > well, at first I though you were correct, but it turns out that > > postgresql > > is also inconsistent. Consider a table with a field username. 3 > records: > > > > "Brian % Schaffner" > > "Brian T Schaffner" > > "%" > > > > select * from table where username='%' gets all rows (expected) > > select * from table where username='%%' gets the row with "%" > (expected) > > select * from table where username='%%%' gets the row with "%" > > (expected) > > select * from table where username='%%%%' gets no rows (expected) > > select * from table where username='% %' gets the 2 name rows > (expected) > > select * from table where username='% %%' gets the 2 name rows (NOT > > expected) > > select * from table where username='%% %' gets no rows (NOT > expected) > > select * from table where username='% % %' gets the 2 name rows > > (expected) > > select * from table where username='% %% %' gets the 2 name rows > (NOT > > expected) > > select * from table where username='% % % %' gets no rows (expected) > > > > so, if %% is the LIKE representation for a literal %, then why does > '% > > %%' return > > the 2 name rows, and '%% %' return no rows, and '% %% %' not return > the > > row with the > > embedded literal %? > > > > I could not get postgres to single out the row with the embedded % > using > > LIKE. > > > > why is this not getting any easier to define? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel J. Lashua [mailto:djl@stftx9.irngtx.tel.gte.com] > > Sent: Friday, September 25, 1998 10:58 AM > > To: Brian Schaffner > > Cc: 'Rasmus Lerdorf'; 'bourbon@bourbon.netvision.net.il'; > > php3@lists.php.net > > Subject: RE: [PHP3] ARGH!! strstr() changed? > > > > > > On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, Brian Schaffner wrote: > > > > > in PostgreSQL (6.3.2 on FreeBSD 2.2.6): > > > > > > select * from table where field like '%%'; > > > > > > returns NO rows; > > > > > > select * from table where field like '%'; > > > > > > returns ALL rows; > > > > > > -brian- > > > > > > > > > I am not in any way doubting what you say... but that doesn't seem > > right. > > They should both reuturn all rows. Maybe in Postgres %% is the way > to > > state you actually want to search for ONE "%"? > > > > Out of curiosity, if you have time, could you test that. Make a > table > > with > > a field and in one row of the table in the field insert "%". Then do > > your > > select * from table where somefield LIKE '%%' and see if it returns > the > > one row? > > > > Am I offbase, or does that sound like incorrect behavior to you too? > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > -- > PHP 3 Mailing List http://www.php.net/ > To unsubscribe send an empty message to php3-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > To subscribe to the digest list: php3-digest-subscribe@lists.php.net > For help: php3-help@lists.php.net Archive: > http://www.php.net/mailsearch.php3 >
pgsql-hackers by date: