> I submitted two patch patches to fix the select_having test. The first patch addressed problems caused by
> a machine dependency on the degree of accuracy of datetime. CVS is currently showing this first patch.
>
> The second patch was to fix my first patch. It has NOT been applied yet. The problem with he first
> patch, which you are seeing now, is that the test case demonstrates another bug which has nothing to do
> with having. It has to do with GROUPing by a function and the argument of the function not appearing
> elsewhere in the target list. Weird! In any case the latest patch will fix the regression.
>
> BTW, I have also sent one other patch that I am waiting to see in CVS. These one is an interim AND/OR
> memory exhaustion fix.
Yes, I am behind on the patch applications. Marc probably stopped while
I did my mega-cleanup, and I have been scratching my head on the
platform failures. Hopefully one of us will get it soon.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
