Thus spake Thomas G. Lockhart
> > Perhaps use the data type SERIAL to autocreate a sequence. Should
> > make life easier for novices. We are getting too many sequence
> > questions.
>
> That would be possible. I'd be happier doing it for v6.5, since I'm
> hoping to work on docs in the meantime. Of course, maybe it would be
> easy :)
>
> What should the syntax be exactly?
>
> CREATE TABLE t (s SERIAL);
>
> or
>
> CREATE TABLE t (i INT DEFAULT SERIAL);
I think the first one is simpler and, as far as I know, is more common
in existing practice.
> Are there alternate syntaxes from other DBs which should be considered?
The standard doesn't specify a serial type. One question would be,
what is the behaviour? Should the field always be set to the next
number on insert or should we be able to override it? I prefer the
former but I can see that it would be a problem on dump and reload.
How do other DBs handle this?
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
