> I'm running into some naming problems while doing so. Having
> pg_table, pg_view etc. as views lets a users assume pg_index
> would be one too where to get some information. But pg_index
> already exists.
>
> Should I name all of them pgv_... ?
>
> Other databases have many views starting with DBA or SYS on
> the other hand. For now I'll start naming them pgv_..., we
> could rename them before applying the patch.
I recall that there are some places in the code (maybe only in the
client-side drivers?) which check explicitly for a "pg_%" pattern to
decide if a table or resource is a system table.
How about "pg_index_v", for example?
- Tom
