Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems
Date
Msg-id 199808250235.WAA01804@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> Firstly, configure.in seems to have reverted to it's original state
> >> where the HAVE_LONG* stuff was broken.
>
> > OK, I am not dealing with configure.in again on this int64 stuff.  If
> > someone wants to submit a patch to fix it, go ahead.  No, "Just make it
> > look like ...".
>
> It's weird, I see the entries in "cvs log configure.in" saying that you
> fixed it in updates 1.184 and 1.185, but there's no difference between
> 1.183 and 1.185:
>
> $ cvs diff -r1.183 -r1.185  configure.in
> Index: configure.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/pgsql/src/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.183
> retrieving revision 1.185
> diff -r1.183 -r1.185
> $
>
> I hope this was just pilot error on your part, and not a symptom of
> a cvs bug :-(
>
> Anyway, here's a patch from the way that configure.in looks as of right
> now, 1.185.
>
> (It looks like the reason I messed up the int64 tests is that I copied
> and pasted the HAVE_DBL_MIN_PROBLEM test, which was also broken...
> fixed here.)
>

I think I applied a patch, then reversed it manually trying to fix the
other section.  Patch applied and config run.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems