Tom Lane wrote:
> > These results are also correct. Somewhat. I do not know much about
> > datatime porting issues, but if I do a:
> > SELECT d1 FROM DATETIME_TBL
> > I get time reported to the 1/100 of a second. If GROUP BY d1 the
> > hundredths are not shown. Thus, the counts and groupings are correct.
> > Its just not showing the hundredths portion.
>
> The issue here is why you (or whoever it was prepared the regression
> test) got different results from me...
>
I do get the same results - on my RS/6000. And I did not prepare the
test. But, to be more precise:
1. The failure does not indicate any problems w/ the HAVING clause.
2. This test will never work if there is a machine dependence on the
ability to resolve datatime down to the 1/100 second.
3. There appears to be something strange going on in the way GROUPed BY
datetime columns do not display the 1/100 portion of seconds. Is this a
known problem?
Unless someone objects, I will submit a test suit to, at least remove the
false reading on select_having.
