> Is there a reason why anyone renamed struct index to
> struct RelationGetRelidindex in ecpg's type.h? I'm surprised it doesn't
> break the ecpg compilation procedure since the usage in preproc.y hasn't
> been changed at all.
>
> I just checked and found that is does indeed break ecpg compilation. I just
> didn't notice because ecpg isn't compiled per default. Any reason why it
> isn't?
>
> Michael
Sorry. I am fixing it now. I am not sure how that got changed, but I
clearly did it:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** type.h 1998/05/26 13:43:55 1.10
--- type.h 1998/08/19 01:33:47
***************
*** 75,81 ****
char *str;
};
! struct index
{
int index1;
int index2;
--- 75,81 ----
char *str;
};
! struct RelationGetRelidindex
{
int index1;
int index2;
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
