Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend
Date
Msg-id 6143.902367455@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to CVS and the backend  (Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk> writes:
> I've just run CVS UPDATE again, in another attempt to get initdb to run.
> Anyhow, I noticed that there was a message saying that there were
> conflicts. Any ideas?

That means CVS got confused about how to update your local file.
Typically, it means that the file now on your disk is broken ---
it will have both versions of the conflicting text.  CVS is expecting
you to sort it out, which would be the right thing if the difference
involved a change that you needed to commit to the source tree.

If the conflict is in a file that you have not got interesting private
changes in, the best thing is just to delete the local copy of that file
and do cvs update again to fetch a clean copy.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Hartwig
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects