Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status?
Date
Msg-id 463.903363453@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status?  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> There is someone working on a man page output from the sgml, and if that
> comes through then this is pretty much a moot point.

Right, that's the ultimate solution for not having to maintain two sets
of doc files.  I was kinda hoping that that would happen for 6.4,
actually.  Any estimate how soon that will be possible?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Hartwig
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion)
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday