Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 July 2005

• 00:00   Re: 2PC transaction id Oliver Jowett
• 00:37   Re: 2PC transaction id Oliver Jowett
• 00:53   Re: 2PC transaction id Dave Cramer
• 02:21   Re: 2PC transaction id Tom Lane
• 02:26   Re: 2PC transaction id Tom Lane
• 02:45   Re: 2PC transaction id Oliver Jowett
• 02:52   Re: 2PC transaction id Tom Lane
• 02:53   Re: Open items Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 02:59   Re: Open items Tom Lane
• 03:11   TODO item done Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:22   Re: 2PC transaction id Oliver Jowett
• 03:52   Re: [ANNOUNCE] Language to use with SQL database - Number ONE computer Marc G. Fournier
• 03:58   Re: 2PC transaction id Oliver Jowett
• 04:05   Re: [ANNOUNCE] Language to use with SQL database - Number Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:09   Re: 3des functions? Michael Fuhr
• 06:00   Re: tsearch2 vs core? Junji TERAMOTO
• 06:08   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Qingqing Zhou
• 06:47   Re: 2PC transaction id Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:23   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dave Page
• 08:05   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Fabien COELHO
• 09:33   Re: Occupied port warning Peter Eisentraut
• 09:33   Re: 2PC transaction id Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:13   Re: 2PC transaction id Oliver Jowett
• 12:41   Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity [patch] Neil Conway
• 12:49   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Stephen Frost
• 13:20   How to let more than one sessions work for same global transaction ? jw
• 13:20   Re: Occupied port warning Tom Lane
• 13:53   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Tom Lane
• 14:04   Re: [PATCHES] pl/pgsql: END verbosity [patch] Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: TODO item done Bruce Momjian
• 15:06   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Fabien COELHO
• 15:21   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Stephen Frost
• 16:42   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Fabien COELHO
• 16:49   Re: Backend working directories and absolute file paths Peter Eisentraut
• 16:49   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Bruce Momjian
• 16:58   Re: 2PC transaction id Barry Lind
• 17:02   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Stephen Frost
• 17:03   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Tom Lane
• 17:06   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Bruce Momjian
• 17:08   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Stephen Frost
• 17:13   Re: 2PC transaction id Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:36   Re: 2PC transaction id Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:48   Regression test plpgsql vs. rangefuncs conflict Peter Eisentraut
• 18:06   Re: 2PC transaction id Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:10   Re: 2PC transaction id Bruce Momjian
• 18:17   Autotools update Peter Eisentraut
• 19:27   Re: Autotools update Tom Lane
• 19:29   Re: 2PC transaction id Tom Lane
• 19:52   Re: Autotools update Peter Eisentraut
• 20:07   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Robert Treat
• 20:18   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Tom Lane
• 20:20   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Stephen Frost
• 20:29   Re: Regression test plpgsql vs. rangefuncs conflict Tom Lane
• 20:57   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Tom Lane
• 21:21   HEAD: create index failure: firefly on buildfarm Larry Rosenman
• 21:30   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Stephen Frost
• 22:46   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Tom Lane
• 23:07   Re: Open items Jim C. Nasby
• 23:12   rtree_gist merge breaks regression Andrew Dunstan
• 23:26   Re: rtree_gist merge breaks regression Tom Lane
• 23:42   Re: rtree_gist merge breaks regression Andrew Dunstan

2 July 2005

• 00:03   Re: 2PC transaction id Oliver Jowett
• 00:19   Re: 2PC transaction id Oliver Jowett
• 03:05   Re: Autotools update Marc G. Fournier
• 06:15   Re: commit_delay, siblings Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:39   Re: Autotools update Peter Eisentraut
• 09:01   Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity [patch] Neil Conway
• 11:24   rtree_gist work Janko Richter
• 13:01   Re: rtree_gist work Bruce Momjian
• 13:32   Re: rtree_gist work Janko Richter
• 13:38   Re: rtree_gist work Bruce Momjian
• 13:40   Re: rtree_gist work Tom Lane
• 13:40   Re: rtree_gist work Tom Lane
• 14:09   Re: rtree_gist work Janko Richter
• 14:19   Re: rtree_gist work Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: rtree_gist work Bruce Momjian
• 14:46   Re: rtree_gist work Janko Richter
• 15:33   Re: 2PC transaction id Kenneth Marshall
• 16:51   Re: rtree_gist work Greg Stark
• 17:59   Re: rtree_gist work Janko Richter
• 18:49   Re: Autotools update Marc G. Fournier
• 18:53   Re: Autotools update Peter Eisentraut
• 18:56   Re: Autotools update Bruce Momjian
• 19:46   Re: Autotools update Peter Eisentraut
• 20:08   Re: GiST concurrency commited Bruce Momjian
• 20:17   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Bruce Momjian
• 20:30   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Bruce Momjian
• 21:47   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dave Page
• 22:07   Re: Autotools update Marc G. Fournier
• 22:42   Re: Autotools update Andrew Dunstan
• 23:10   Re: Autotools update Tom Lane
• 23:24   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Andreas Pflug
• 23:28   Re: Problem with dblink regression test - FIXED Bruce Momjian
• 23:35   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Bruce Momjian
• 23:36   Re: bug in ALTER TABLE / TYPE Bruce Momjian

3 July 2005

• 00:32   Re: Autotools update Marc G. Fournier
• 01:06   Re: Autotools update Mark Kirkwood
• 02:16   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 02:45   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Michael Glaesemann
• 05:29   Re: bug in ALTER TABLE / TYPE Neil Conway
• 05:32   contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Michael Fuhr
• 05:44   Re: Autotools update Peter Eisentraut
• 06:24   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Russell Smith
• 06:43   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Michael Fuhr
• 06:47   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Greg Stark
• 07:35   Re: 2PC transaction id Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:47   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Andreas Pflug
• 09:26   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dawid Kuroczko
• 11:22   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Russell Smith
• 13:00   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Marko Kreen
• 13:14   Re: Autotools update Matthew D. Fuller
• 13:54   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Michael Fuhr
• 14:44   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Marko Kreen
• 15:49   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 16:08   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Tom Lane
• 16:10   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Tom Lane
• 16:53   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Marko Kreen
• 17:00   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Tom Lane
• 17:16   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Marko Kreen
• 17:21   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Alvaro Herrera
• 17:32   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Tom Lane
• 18:08   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Greg Stark
• 18:35   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 19:00   Re: Fix for cross compilation Peter Eisentraut

4 July 2005

• 01:38   Re: bug in ALTER TABLE / TYPE Bruce Momjian
• 01:42   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Neil Conway
• 02:27   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Michael Fuhr
• 02:34   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Neil Conway
• 03:55   HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default locations Tom Lane
• 04:14   Schedule for release 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 04:15   Re: HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default locations Oliver Jowett
• 04:29   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Michael Fuhr
• 04:43   Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? Tom Lane
• 04:51   Re: Schedule for release 8.1 Marc G. Fournier
• 07:38   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dave Page
• 12:21   Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles Fabien COELHO
• 12:34   Re: Schedule for release 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 13:53   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Bruce Momjian
• 14:11   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dave Page
• 14:11   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Bruce Momjian
• 14:19   Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] pgcrypto: pgp_encrypt v3 Bruce Momjian
• 14:49   Re: [PATCHES] Disable page writes when fsync off, add GUC Bruce Momjian
• 15:58   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Peter Eisentraut
• 16:31   New warnings in plgsql/src/scan.l Alvaro Herrera
• 16:45   Use of copydir vs. cp Bruce Momjian
• 16:51   Re: Use of copydir vs. cp Bruce Momjian
• 16:52   Re: New warnings in plgsql/src/scan.l Peter Eisentraut
• 16:55   Re: Use of copydir vs. cp Alvaro Herrera
• 16:58   Re: New warnings in plgsql/src/scan.l Alvaro Herrera
• 17:01   Re: Use of copydir vs. cp Bruce Momjian
• 17:21   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Robert Treat
• 17:26   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Bruce Momjian
• 18:54   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dave Page
• 19:42   Re: HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default locations Jim C. Nasby
• 20:06   Re: HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default locations Andrew Dunstan
• 21:47   Re: Catch the commit Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
• 22:56   Warnings compiling preproc.y Victor Yegorov

5 July 2005

• 00:20   Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] pgcrypto: pgp_encrypt v3 Neil Conway
• 00:24   Re: Warnings compiling preproc.y Neil Conway
• 01:34   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Robert Treat
• 01:37   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:34   Re: New warnings in plgsql/src/scan.l Tom Lane
• 07:30   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dave Page
• 09:50   Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] pgcrypto: pgp_encrypt v3 Marko Kreen
• 13:23   timezone changes break windows and cygwin Andrew Dunstan
• 14:40   pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Michael Fuhr
• 15:46   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Tom Lane
• 15:55   Re: [PATCHES] Disable page writes when fsync off, add GUC Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: New warnings in plgsql/src/scan.l Tom Lane
• 16:22   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Marko Kreen
• 17:18   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Michael Fuhr
• 17:24   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Bruce Momjian
• 17:44   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Jim C. Nasby
• 18:04   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Tom Lane
• 18:13   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Peter Eisentraut
• 18:18   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Tom Lane
• 18:24   Re: [PATCHES] Disable page writes when fsync off, add GUC Bruce Momjian
• 18:32   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Andrew Dunstan
• 18:45   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Marko Kreen
• 18:55   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Tom Lane
• 19:32   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Marko Kreen
• 19:36   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Tom Lane
• 19:49   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Marko Kreen
• 19:58   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Tom Lane
• 20:09   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Peter Eisentraut
• 20:12   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Marko Kreen
• 20:16   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Tom Lane
• 20:27   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Marko Kreen
• 20:42   Re: Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Jochem van Dieten
• 22:13   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Jim C. Nasby
• 23:14   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Bruce Momjian
• 23:20   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Tom Lane
• 23:24   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Tom Lane
• 23:53   oids vs composite types, in cvs head Andrew - Supernews

6 July 2005

• 01:18   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Bruce Momjian
• 02:19   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Andrew Dunstan
• 02:39   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: oids vs composite types, in cvs head Tom Lane
• 03:08   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Bruce Momjian
• 03:11   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Bruce Momjian
• 03:22   Re: oids vs composite types, in cvs head Michael Fuhr
• 03:29   Re: oids vs composite types, in cvs head Michael Fuhr
• 03:29   Re: oids vs composite types, in cvs head Andrew - Supernews
• 04:56   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Tom Lane
• 10:07   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dave Page
• 10:44   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Andrew Dunstan
• 10:44   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Marko Kreen
• 14:27   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Bruce Momjian
• 14:29   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Tom Lane
• 14:47   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Bruce Momjian
• 15:05   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Tom Lane
• 15:16   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Bruce Momjian
• 15:27   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Tom Lane
• 15:53   GiST notice Teodor Sigaev
• 16:06   Re: [INTERFACES] By Passed Domain Constraints Tom Lane
• 16:16   Re: pgcrypto 3des failure, OpenSSL 0.9.8, Solaris 9/sparc Tom Lane
• 16:23   Re: GiST notice Joshua D. Drake
• 18:05   Re: GiST notice Oleg Bartunov
• 19:42   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Peter Eisentraut
• 19:54   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Peter Eisentraut
• 20:49   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 21:06   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Bruce Momjian
• 21:40   Re: timezone changes break windows and cygwin Bruce Momjian
• 22:23   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 22:36   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Bruce Momjian
• 22:39   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Bruce Momjian
• 22:53   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs

7 July 2005

• 00:17   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Joshua D. Drake
• 00:49   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Oliver Jowett
• 01:21   Re: [INTERFACES] By Passed Domain Constraints Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:38   Mistake in latest plperl patch Joshua D. Drake
• 02:52   PQescapeIdentifier Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:02   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 04:10   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 04:16   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruno Wolff III
• 04:25   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 04:29   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 04:41   Re: Mistake in latest plperl patch Bruce Momjian
• 05:05   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Mark Wong
• 07:28   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 07:31   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 07:54   A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support Koichi Suzuki
• 10:05   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 10:12   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 13:31   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 13:38   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 14:30   windows regression failure - prepared xacts Andrew Dunstan
• 15:03   SQL99 - Nested Tables Darren Alcorn
• 15:03   Re: [INTERFACES] By Passed Domain Constraints Robert Perry
• 15:15   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 15:18   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 15:28   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 15:32   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Greg Stark
• 15:36   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 15:40   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 15:51   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 16:00   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 16:08   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Joshua D. Drake
• 16:11   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 16:23   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 16:40   Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 16:52   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Josh Berkus
• 16:57   Re: A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support Josh Berkus
• 16:59   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 17:49   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Tom Lane
• 18:02   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 18:17   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables David Fetter
• 18:52   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Andrew - Supernews
• 19:25   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Darren Alcorn
• 19:25   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Kenneth Marshall
• 19:30   8.1dev ssl broke? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:36   Re: 8.1dev ssl broke? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:51   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Josh Berkus
• 20:10   Re: 8.1dev ssl broke? Michael Fuhr
• 20:21   Re: 8.1dev ssl broke? Joshua D. Drake
• 20:33    Ayush Parashar
• 20:44   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Jim C. Nasby
• 20:56   Multi-byte and client side character encoding tests for copy command.. Ayush Parashar
• 20:58   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 21:27   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 22:59   Pg_autovacuum on FreeBSD Rodrigo Moreno
• 23:09   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables David Fetter
• 23:17   temp_buffers Joshua D. Drake
• 23:24   Re: temp_buffers Alvaro Herrera

8 July 2005

• 00:12   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Josh Berkus
• 00:22   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables David Fetter
• 01:15   Re: Pg_autovacuum on FreeBSD Mark Kirkwood
• 02:18   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:20   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:23   Re: Pg_autovacuum on FreeBSD Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:46   Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:19   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Tom Lane
• 03:22   Re: temp_buffers Tom Lane
• 03:32   Re: Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's? Tom Lane
• 03:37   Re: Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:38   Re: Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:45   Re: Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's? Tom Lane
• 04:13   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 04:50   Re: process crash when a plpython function returns James William Pye
• 07:34   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 09:18   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 09:41   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Dawid Kuroczko
• 13:06   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 13:07   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 13:29   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 13:41   Re: Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's? Bruno Wolff III
• 13:44   Re: Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's? Tom Lane
• 13:48   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 13:48   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:58   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Dennis Bjorklund
• 14:00   Re: Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's? Andrew Dunstan
• 14:07   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Darren Alcorn
• 14:07   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Darren Alcorn
• 14:27   Mailing list D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 14:28   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Bruno Wolff III
• 14:35   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Stephan Szabo
• 14:45   Re: Mailing list Marc G. Fournier
• 14:55   Re: Mailing list Marc G. Fournier
• 15:38   Documentation on roles Alvaro Herrera
• 15:45   Re: Documentation on roles Stephen Frost
• 15:50   Re: Documentation on roles Tom Lane
• 16:15   Re: Documentation on roles Alvaro Herrera
• 16:27   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 18:36   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 18:46   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 21:35   Fixing domain input Tom Lane
• 22:26   RES: Pg_autovacuum on FreeBSD Rodrigo Moreno
• 23:05   Very vague pg_dump question ... Marc G. Fournier
• 23:19   Re: Very vague pg_dump question ... Tom Lane
• 23:27   Re: Very vague pg_dump question ... Josh Berkus

9 July 2005

• 00:29   Re: Very vague pg_dump question ... Marc G. Fournier
• 08:09   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 13:48   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Mike Mascari
• 13:57   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 15:48   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Tom Lane
• 18:59   roles question Joe Conway
• 19:13   Re: roles question Stephen Frost
• 19:17   Re: roles question Joe Conway
• 20:34   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Hannu Krosing
• 20:44   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Hannu Krosing
• 20:51   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Alvaro Herrera

10 July 2005

• 00:13   another roles related question Joe Conway
• 00:17   Re: another roles related question Stephen Frost
• 00:22   Re: another roles related question Joe Conway
• 00:29   Re: another roles related question Stephen Frost
• 07:26   Hide source code Márcio A. Sepp
• 07:38   Re: Hide source code Alvaro Herrera
• 07:41   Re: Hide source code Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 08:59   latest pgcrypto patches cause compile errors Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 09:19   Re: latest pgcrypto patches cause compile errors Marko Kreen
• 14:00   Re: latest pgcrypto patches cause compile errors Bruce Momjian
• 14:25   Visiting San Jose Bruce Momjian
• 14:25   Re: latest pgcrypto patches cause compile errors Marko Kreen
• 14:26   Re: language handlers in public schema Bruce Momjian
• 15:09   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 15:35   Re: latest pgcrypto patches cause compile errors Marko Kreen
• 15:37   Re: latest pgcrypto patches cause compile errors Bruce Momjian
• 18:13   Re: latest pgcrypto patches cause compile errors Marko Kreen
• 18:16   Re: latest pgcrypto patches cause compile errors Marko Kreen
• 18:32   Binary input functions fail to enforce typmod Tom Lane
• 18:33   Re: latest pgcrypto patches cause compile errors Bruce Momjian
• 19:40   suspicious pointer/integer coersion Andrew Dunstan
• 20:11   Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion Tom Lane
• 20:12   plperl warning Bruce Momjian
• 20:31   Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion Andrew Dunstan
• 20:40   Re: Hide source code David Fetter
• 21:17   Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: plperl warning Tom Lane
• 21:29   Re: plperl warning Andrew Dunstan
• 21:42   Re: plperl warning Tom Lane

11 July 2005

• 00:10   Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion Andrew Dunstan
• 02:20   Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion Andrew Dunstan
• 03:30   Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:47   Re: Fixing domain input Tom Lane
• 07:53   fetch_search_path() and elog.c Ferruccio Zamuner
• 08:17   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 10:52   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 10:54   4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 11:37   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Andrew Dunstan
• 12:00   Re: Hide source code Merlin Moncure
• 12:01   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 13:14   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 13:19   Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion Andrew Dunstan
• 13:21   Re: [BUGS] BUG #1745: Unable to delete data from the database Sivaraman K.G
• 13:21   Re: [BUGS] BUG #1744: Directory Missing Sivaraman K.G
• 13:25   Re: fetch_search_path() and elog.c Tom Lane
• 13:28   Re: [BUGS] BUG #1745: Unable to delete data from the Dennis Bjorklund
• 13:31   Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion Andrew Dunstan
• 14:10   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Tom Lane
• 14:13   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 14:27   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 14:39   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Tom Lane
• 15:09   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Tom Lane
• 15:20   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Michael Fuhr
• 15:26   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 15:41   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 15:46   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Tom Lane
• 15:51   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Michael Fuhr
• 15:58   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 16:15   Re: Hide source code David Fetter
• 16:21   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 16:22   Re: fetch_search_path() and elog.c Ferruccio Zamuner
• 16:27   Re: Hide source code Josh Berkus
• 16:44   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 17:00   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Tom Lane
• 17:04   Re: fetch_search_path() and elog.c Alvaro Herrera
• 17:06   Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling? Joshua D. Drake
• 17:11   Re: Hide source code David Fetter
• 17:50   Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling? Tom Lane
• 18:06   Re: Hide source code Merlin Moncure
• 18:34   Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:04   Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling? Tom Lane
• 19:06   Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:10   Vacuum summary? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:20   Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling? Tom Lane
• 19:21   Re: Vacuum summary? Tom Lane
• 19:36   Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:38   Re: Vacuum summary? Joshua D. Drake

12 July 2005

• 01:17   Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion Tom Lane
• 01:20   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Kris Jurka
• 12:57   Re: [PATCHES] thousands comma numeric formatting in psql Peter Eisentraut
• 12:59   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 13:05   PL/Perl list value return causes segfault Michael Fuhr
• 13:30   CONCURRENT INDEXing again (was: Must be owner to truncate?) Hannu Krosing
• 13:30   Where is the decision about placement of new tuple made ? Hannu Krosing
• 13:31   About postgres C++ APIs... Bhanu Prakash
• 13:33   New dot releases? Devrim GUNDUZ
• 13:54   Re: Where is the decision about placement of new tuple made ? Alvaro Herrera
• 14:27   Re: Where is the decision about placement of new tuple made ? Tom Lane
• 14:48   Re: [PATCHES] thousands comma numeric formatting in psql Bruce Momjian
• 15:23   Re: [PATCHES] thousands comma numeric formatting in psql Tom Lane
• 15:26   Re: [PATCHES] thousands comma numeric formatting in psql Bruce Momjian
• 15:33   Re: [PATCHES] thousands comma numeric formatting in psql Tom Lane
• 15:50   Re: [PATCHES] thousands comma numeric formatting in psql Bruce Momjian
• 16:20   Re: CONCURRENT INDEXing again (was: Must be owner to truncate?) Tom Lane
• 16:33   Re: [PATCHES] thousands comma numeric formatting in psql Tom Lane
• 16:51   Re: [PATCHES] thousands comma numeric formatting in psql David Fetter
• 17:05   Re: New dot releases? Bruno Wolff III
• 17:18   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Jim C. Nasby
• 17:41   pg_dump schema search_path; selectSourceSchema() Thomas F. O'Connell
• 17:55   multibyte regression tests Andrew Dunstan
• 18:02   Re: Where is the decision about placement of new tuple made ? Jim C. Nasby
• 18:06   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Kris Jurka
• 18:59   Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault Andrew Dunstan
• 19:07   Re: pg_dump schema search_path; selectSourceSchema() Tom Lane
• 19:33   Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault Alvaro Herrera
• 19:46   Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault Andrew Dunstan
• 19:47   dbt2 & opteron performance Mark Wong
• 19:54   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 20:13   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 20:29   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Tom Lane
• 20:36   Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault Tom Lane
• 21:01   Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault David Fetter
• 21:21   Re: Quick-and-dirty compression for WAL backup blocks Junji TERAMOTO
• 21:25   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Andrew Dunstan
• 21:25   Re: Vacuum summary? Simon Riggs
• 21:53   Re: Vacuum summary? Tom Lane
• 21:56   Re: Vacuum summary? Joshua D. Drake
• 22:06   Re: dbt2 & opteron performance Denis Lussier
• 22:42   Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault Andrew Dunstan
• 23:59   Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault Michael Fuhr

13 July 2005

• 02:10   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Bruce Momjian
• 02:31   Re: [PATCHES] thousands comma numeric formatting in psql Bruce Momjian
• 08:05   Order by optimisations? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:33   Re: Vacuum summary? Simon Riggs
• 10:53   A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Simon Riggs
• 13:28   Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion Andrew Dunstan
• 13:32   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Richard Huxton
• 13:38   SQLException: Cannot be less than zero ( BUG ? ) 
• 15:05   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Andrew Dunstan
• 15:10   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Simon Riggs
• 15:49   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Tom Lane
• 16:25   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Affan Salman
• 16:31   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Affan Salman
• 17:04   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Andrew Dunstan
• 17:14   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Tom Lane
• 17:24   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Andrew Dunstan
• 18:19   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Oleg Bartunov
• 19:07   full_page_writes = on Joshua D. Drake
• 19:23   commit_delay and commit_siblings Joshua D. Drake
• 19:27   pthread stack on FreeBSD WAS: HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Jim C. Nasby
• 19:47   Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default Andrew Dunstan
• 19:51   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Andrew Dunstan
• 19:53   checkpoint_segments 32 megs? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:58   Re: commit_delay and commit_siblings Tom Lane
• 20:23   Re: checkpoint_segments 32 megs? Alvaro Herrera
• 20:33   Determine index's attribute number by scankey Victor Yegorov
• 21:50   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Tom Lane
• 21:58   Re: checkpoint_segments 32 megs? Tom Lane
• 21:59   Re: Determine index's attribute number by scankey Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: checkpoint_segments 32 megs? Simon Riggs
• 23:39   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Andrew Dunstan

14 July 2005

• 01:31   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Tom Lane
• 03:00   win32 _dosmaperr() Qingqing Zhou
• 03:45   Toward pg_upgrade David Fetter
• 04:27   test David Fetter
• 04:41   Re: Toward pg_upgrade Neil Conway
• 08:38   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Hannu Krosing
• 08:38   Re: [Bizgres-general] Re: A Guide to Constraint Hannu Krosing
• 08:40   Re: CONCURRENT INDEXing again (was: Must be owner to Hannu Krosing
• 08:48   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Hannu Krosing
• 08:49   Re: Order by optimisations? Hannu Krosing
• 08:50   Re: win32 _dosmaperr() Magnus Hagander
• 09:00   Re: Order by optimisations? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 09:32   Re: Order by optimisations? Michael Paesold
• 12:14   7.3 regression failures after recent commit Michael Fuhr
• 12:24   Re: Order by optimisations? Andrew Dunstan
• 12:32   Re: win32 _dosmaperr() Qingqing Zhou
• 12:35   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Andrew Dunstan
• 12:46   Re: win32 _dosmaperr() Merlin Moncure
• 12:50   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Dave Page
• 12:52   Re: Order by optimisations? Jochem van Dieten
• 13:32   Re: Order by optimisations? Tom Lane
• 13:36   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Andrew Dunstan
• 14:02   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Dave Page
• 14:09   Re: 7.3 regression failures after recent commit Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Andrew Dunstan
• 14:20   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Dave Page
• 14:53   Autovacuum loose ends Tom Lane
• 15:31   Re: static genericcostestimate Alvaro Herrera
• 16:20   Question about convert the binary WAL file clipper tokyo
• 16:21   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Jeffrey W. Baker
• 16:50   Re: Question about convert the binary WAL file Alvaro Herrera
• 16:58   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Matthew T. O'Connor
• 17:06   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Alvaro Herrera
• 17:32   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Jeffrey W. Baker
• 17:34   Simplifying identification of temporary tables Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Petr Jelinek
• 17:52   Re: windows regression failure - prepared xacts Andrew Dunstan
• 18:05   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Tom Lane
• 18:09   Re: Simplifying identification of temporary tables Merlin Moncure
• 18:13   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Tom Lane
• 18:20   Re: Simplifying identification of temporary tables Tom Lane
• 18:30   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Matthew T. O'Connor
• 19:07   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Tom Lane
• 19:30   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Greg Stark
• 19:34   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Greg Stark
• 19:42   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Greg Stark
• 19:44   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Joshua D. Drake
• 20:09   Re: Toward pg_upgrade David Fetter
• 20:12   Re: Simplifying identification of temporary tables Merlin Moncure
• 20:29   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Simon Riggs
• 20:30   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Hannu Krosing
• 20:34   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Simon Riggs
• 20:35   Re: Determine index's attribute number by scankey Victor Yegorov
• 21:13   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion ( Luke Lonergan
• 21:24   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Hannu Krosing
• 21:41   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Simon Riggs
• 21:51   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Simon Riggs
• 22:02   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Luke Lonergan
• 22:07   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion ( Luke Lonergan
• 22:16   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion ( Luke Lonergan
• 22:21   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Hannu Krosing
• 22:22   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion ( Simon Riggs
• 22:27   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion ( Simon Riggs
• 22:30   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Simon Riggs
• 22:45   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion ( Luke Lonergan
• 22:49   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Simon Riggs

15 July 2005

• 01:18   Re: multibyte regression tests Luke Lonergan
• 02:29   Re: Order by optimisations? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:34   Re: Order by optimisations? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:36   Re: Simplifying identification of temporary tables Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:54   Segfault Exiting psql David Wheeler
• 05:03   Re: Order by optimisations? Tom Lane
• 05:35   Re: Order by optimisations? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:34   pg_get_prepared? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:54   Re: pg_get_prepared? Volkan YAZICI
• 06:59   Re: pg_get_prepared? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:04   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Hannu Krosing
• 07:12   Re: pg_get_prepared? Neil Conway
• 07:17   Re: pg_get_prepared? Volkan YAZICI
• 08:12   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Hannu Krosing
• 12:35   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Simon Riggs
• 14:07   Re: pg_get_prepared? Tom Lane
• 14:19   Re: pg_get_prepared? Greg Sabino Mullane
• 14:32   Re: multibyte regression tests Andrew Dunstan
• 14:59   Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion Stephan Szabo
• 15:17   prepared queries in plperl Dmitry Karasik
• 15:31   Re: prepared queries in plperl Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 17:21   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 20:36   Re: multibyte regression tests Luke Lonergan
• 21:07   Re: multibyte regression tests Andrew Dunstan
• 21:32   Re: multibyte regression tests Ayush Parashar
• 21:51   Autovacuum name Rod Taylor
• 22:03   Re: multibyte regression tests Andrew Dunstan
• 23:55   Re: Segfault Exiting psql Tom Lane

16 July 2005

• 01:06   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Kris Jurka
• 05:52   Re: pg_get_prepared? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:38   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Kevin Brown
• 09:22   Re: pg_get_prepared? Mario Weilguni
• 10:09   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Marko Kreen
• 11:49   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 12:18   Re: Autovacuum name Bruce Momjian
• 14:28   Re: Autovacuum name Rod Taylor
• 14:55   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Tom Lane
• 15:20   Re: pg_get_prepared? Kris Jurka
• 15:22   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Kris Jurka
• 16:16   Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Tom Lane
• 17:37   Re: [PATCHES] 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Kris Jurka
• 18:06   Re: [PATCHES] 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved Tom Lane
• 22:29   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Ron Mayer

17 July 2005

• 01:35   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Kevin Brown
• 03:19   Buildfarm issues on specific machines Tom Lane
• 04:16   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Tom Lane
• 04:43   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Tom Lane
• 04:43   Changes improve the performance of INSERT and UPDATE Hiroki Kataoka
• 04:54   Re: Changes improve the performance of INSERT and UPDATE Tom Lane
• 05:37   Re: Changes improve the performance of INSERT and UPDATE Tom Lane
• 06:37   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Kris Jurka
• 08:14   Buildfarm Larry Rosenman
• 13:31   Re: Changes improve the performance of INSERT and UPDATE Hiroki Kataoka
• 13:32   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Pete St. Onge
• 13:32   Re: Segfault Exiting psql David Wheeler
• 13:34   Changes improve the performance of INSERT and UPDATE Hiroki Kataoka
• 14:40   Re: Changes improve the performance of INSERT and UPDATE Hiroki Kataoka
• 15:03   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Tom Lane
• 15:04   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Andrew Dunstan
• 15:13   Re: Buildfarm Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Tom Lane
• 15:59   Re: Buildfarm Andrew Dunstan
• 16:27   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Andrew Dunstan
• 18:32   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Tom Lane
• 18:56   Minor buildfarm HOWTO comment Tom Lane
• 19:09   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Andrew Dunstan
• 19:13   Re: Minor buildfarm HOWTO comment Andrew Dunstan
• 23:38   The reason for loris' intermittent prepared_xacts failures Tom Lane

18 July 2005

• 01:18   Re: Minor buildfarm HOWTO comment Neil Conway
• 01:30   Re: Order by optimisations? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:35   Re: Minor buildfarm HOWTO comment Andrew Dunstan
• 02:14   Re: The reason for loris' intermittent prepared_xacts failures Andrew Dunstan
• 04:35   Missing info for buildfarm reports Tom Lane
• 05:05   Buildfarm failure analysis: penguin on 7.4 branch Tom Lane
• 08:13   Re: Missing info for buildfarm reports Andrew Dunstan
• 13:11   Re: Buildfarm failure analysis: penguin on 7.4 branch Jim Buttafuoco
• 13:40   Re: Buildfarm failure analysis: penguin on 7.4 branch Andrew Dunstan
• 14:02   Re: Buildfarm failure analysis: penguin on 7.4 branch Jim Buttafuoco
• 14:11   Re: Buildfarm failure analysis: penguin on 7.4 branch Andrew Dunstan
• 16:45   Re: Toward pg_upgrade Simon Riggs
• 16:55   escape string syntax and pg_dumpall Patrick Welche
• 17:25   Re: escape string syntax and pg_dumpall Tom Lane
• 18:14   Re: escape string syntax and pg_dumpall Andrew - Supernews
• 19:01   Re: escape string syntax and pg_dumpall Tom Lane

19 July 2005

• 01:30   build farm failure tuna on OSX 10.4 for 8.0 Dave Cramer
• 02:44   Re: The reason for loris' intermittent prepared_xacts failures Petr Jelinek
• 03:03   Re: build farm failure tuna on OSX 10.4 for 8.0 Tom Lane
• 03:05   Re: The reason for loris' intermittent prepared_xacts failures Tom Lane
• 04:08   Truncate on tables with FK's Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:16   Re: Truncate on tables with FK's Tom Lane
• 15:35   Re: escape string syntax and pg_dumpall Patrick Welche
• 15:43   bgwriter, inherited temp tables TODO items? Thomas F. O'Connell
• 17:08   config.sub/config.guess. Larry Rosenman
• 17:27   question on some code. Chris Bowlby
• 17:55   Re: question on some code. Korry
• 18:05   Re: config.sub/config.guess. Peter Eisentraut
• 18:08   Re: config.sub/config.guess. Larry Rosenman
• 18:12   Re: config.sub/config.guess. Tom Lane
• 18:13   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Jim C. Nasby
• 18:16   Re: config.sub/config.guess. Larry Rosenman
• 18:22   Re: question on some code. Tom Lane
• 18:29   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Tom Lane
• 18:31   Re: question on some code. Chris Bowlby
• 18:37   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Jim C. Nasby
• 18:39   Re: question on some code. Chris Bowlby
• 18:49   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Tom Lane
• 18:54   More buildfarm stuff Jim C. Nasby
• 19:12   Re: More buildfarm stuff Tom Lane
• 19:16   Enticing interns to PostgreSQL Jim C. Nasby
• 19:19   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Andrew Dunstan
• 19:25   Re: More buildfarm stuff Jim C. Nasby
• 19:25   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Jim C. Nasby
• 19:42   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Jim C. Nasby
• 19:48   Re: More buildfarm stuff Tom Lane
• 19:53   Re: More buildfarm stuff Andrew Dunstan
• 19:55   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Michael Fuhr
• 19:56   Re: More buildfarm stuff Jim C. Nasby
• 20:00   Re: More buildfarm stuff Andrew Dunstan
• 20:04   Re: More buildfarm stuff Jim C. Nasby
• 20:05   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Jim C. Nasby
• 20:07   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 20:11   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Jim C. Nasby
• 20:18   Re: Enticing interns to PostgreSQL Christopher A. Watford
• 20:42   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Michael Fuhr
• 21:13   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Andrew Dunstan
• 21:23   Constraint Exclusion on all tables Simon Riggs
• 21:51   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Jim C. Nasby
• 22:50   Re: Constraint Exclusion on all tables Jim C. Nasby
• 23:06   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Jim C. Nasby
• 23:16   Re: Constraint Exclusion on all tables Simon Riggs
• 23:47   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Michael Fuhr

20 July 2005

• 07:39   Problems compiling Postgresql 8.0.3 on 10.4 Jamie Deppeler
• 09:58   Re: Problems compiling Postgresql 8.0.3 on 10.4 Dave Cramer
• 10:53   Re: Constraint Exclusion on all tables Dawid Kuroczko
• 13:05   Re: Problems compiling Postgresql 8.0.3 on 10.4 Jeff Trout
• 13:24   Re: More buildfarm stuff Palle Girgensohn
• 14:32   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Tom Lane
• 16:26   Re: Writing Commit Status hint bits (was Re: Constant Simon Riggs
• 17:20   Re: Writing Commit Status hint bits (was Re: Constant WAL replay) Tom Lane
• 17:59   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Peter Eisentraut
• 18:10   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Tom Lane
• 20:44   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Jim C. Nasby
• 20:46   Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines Jim C. Nasby
• 20:54   Re: Constraint Exclusion on all tables Jim C. Nasby
• 21:47   cygwin bulds broken Andrew Dunstan
• 22:30   Re: cygwin bulds broken Andrew Dunstan
• 22:43   Re: Enticing interns to PostgreSQL Jeff Davis
• 23:40   snapshot build broken ... Marc G. Fournier
• 23:59   Timezone bugs Kevin McArthur
• 23:59   Re: snapshot build broken ... Tom Lane

21 July 2005

• 01:10   Re: snapshot build broken ... Marc G. Fournier
• 01:21   Re: snapshot build broken ... Tom Lane
• 01:27   Re: snapshot build broken ... Marc G. Fournier
• 01:37   No user being created during initdb for OS X Jamie Deppeler
• 03:59   Re: No user being created during initdb for OS X Thomas F. O'Connell
• 04:40   Re: No user being created during initdb for OS X Jamie Deppeler
• 05:02   Re: Enticing interns to PostgreSQL Jim C. Nasby
• 11:08   Re: No user being created during initdb for OS X Dave Cramer
• 11:08   recover corrupted pg_controldata from WAL yuanjia lee
• 11:11   Re: No user being created during initdb for OS X Michael Fuhr
• 11:56   Re: No user being created during initdb for OS X Andrew Dunstan
• 12:53   Re: No user being created during initdb for OS X Andrew Dunstan
• 13:12   Re: recover corrupted pg_controldata from WAL Brusser, Michael
• 13:39   Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Bruce Momjian
• 14:00   --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Dave Page
• 14:03   Re: recover corrupted pg_controldata from WAL Tom Lane
• 14:08   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Bruno Wolff III
• 14:19   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Tom Lane
• 14:48   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Tino Wildenhain
• 17:12   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Bruce Momjian
• 17:12   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Bruce Momjian
• 18:02   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 18:06   Re: checkpoint_segments 32 megs? Josh Berkus
• 18:07   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Bruce Momjian
• 18:08   Re: Constraint Exclusion on all tables Josh Berkus
• 18:23   Re: bgwriter, inherited temp tables TODO items? Bruce Momjian
• 19:53   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 19:54   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Greg Stark
• 20:30   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Tom Lane
• 20:34   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Bruce Momjian
• 20:47   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Dann Corbit
• 20:55   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Tom Lane
• 20:57   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 21:00   Re: Constraint Exclusion on all tables Dawid Kuroczko
• 21:06   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Tom Lane
• 21:07   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 21:10   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 21:22   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Tom Lane
• 21:24   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 21:37   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 21:45   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 21:58   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Ron Mayer
• 22:09   Going to OSCON? We need your help! Josh Berkus
• 22:26   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Tom Lane

22 July 2005

• 02:38   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 03:57   Re: Timezone bugs Bruce Momjian
• 04:51   Re: bgwriter, inherited temp tables TODO items? Thomas F. O'Connell
• 05:01   Re: Timezone bugs Bruce Momjian
• 05:06   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Bruce Momjian
• 07:39   Re: recover corrupted pg_controldata from WAL yuanjia lee
• 07:51   Re: Writing Commit Status hint bits (was Re: Constant Simon Riggs
• 09:29   regressin failure on latest CVS ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 09:46   Re: regressin failure on latest CVS Michael Glaesemann
• 09:58   interval->day patch and docs Michael Glaesemann
• 12:42   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Peter Eisentraut
• 12:49   Re: Timezone bugs Jeff Trout
• 13:17   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 13:40   Re: Writing Commit Status hint bits (was Re: Constant WAL replay) Tom Lane
• 13:54   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: Timezone bugs Bruce Momjian
• 14:33   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 14:36   Re: Timezone bugs Andrew - Supernews
• 14:40   Re: regressin failure on latest CVS Bruce Momjian
• 14:42   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 14:44   Re: Constraint Exclusion on all tables Sam Mason
• 15:00   Re: Constraint Exclusion on all tables Germán Poó Caamaño
• 16:20   Re: [PERFORM] Planner doesn't look at LIMIT? Tom Lane
• 16:20   Buildfarm failure - pl/tcl on snake Dave Page
• 16:21   Re: regressin failure on latest CVS Rocco Altier
• 16:23   Re: Writing Commit Status hint bits (was Re: Constant Simon Riggs
• 16:32   Re: Buildfarm failure - pl/tcl on snake Tom Lane
• 16:50   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Bruno Wolff III
• 16:55   Re: Buildfarm failure - pl/tcl on snake Andrew Dunstan
• 17:32   Re: [PERFORM] Planner doesn't look at LIMIT? Simon Riggs
• 17:58   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 18:06   Re: [PERFORM] Planner doesn't look at LIMIT? Tom Lane
• 19:03   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Bruce Momjian
• 19:06   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 19:12   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 19:16   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 19:20   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 19:24   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Dann Corbit
• 19:24   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 19:27   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Dann Corbit
• 19:38   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Andrew - Supernews
• 19:41   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Bruno Wolff III
• 19:56   Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH Andrew Dunstan
• 20:12   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 20:16   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Greg Stark
• 20:19   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 20:21   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 20:24   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 20:43   Re: Buildfarm failure - pl/tcl on snake Dave Page
• 20:49   Re: [PERFORM] Planner doesn't look at LIMIT? Dawid Kuroczko
• 22:33   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Tom Lane
• 22:54   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Alvaro Herrera
• 22:54   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 23:11   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 23:27   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 23:38   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Tom Lane

23 July 2005

• 01:15   Re: Autovacuum loose ends Alvaro Herrera
• 04:24   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Luke Lonergan
• 08:02   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Simon Riggs
• 10:42   Re: [PERFORM] Planner doesn't look at LIMIT? Sam Mason
• 14:53   Re: regressin failure on latest CVS Bruce Momjian
• 14:54   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: In the stats test, delay for the stats collector Bruce Momjian
• 15:16   Re: regressin failure on latest CVS Rocco Altier
• 15:33   Re: regressin failure on latest CVS ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 15:36   Re: regressin failure on latest CVS Bruce Momjian
• 15:46   Re: regressin failure on latest CVS ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 16:38   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Greg Stark
• 16:58   Re: regressin failure on latest CVS ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 17:15   Re: regressin failure on latest CVS Bruce Momjian
• 17:32   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Tom Lane
• 18:27   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Greg Stark
• 19:01   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Bruce Momjian
• 19:02   regression failure on stats test Bruce Momjian
• 19:11   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Dave Page
• 19:20   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Bruce Momjian
• 21:13   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Tom Lane
• 23:58   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Andrew Dunstan

24 July 2005

• 01:30   An In-memory Bitmap Index Bug Jie Zhang
• 02:26   Re: An In-memory Bitmap Index Bug Tom Lane
• 02:35   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Michael Fuhr
• 02:39   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Tom Lane
• 08:58   Re: Constraint Exclusion on all tables Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:54   Re: Constraint Exclusion on all tables Simon Riggs
• 13:21   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Michael Fuhr
• 13:41   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Ron Mayer
• 13:50   Re: interval->day patch and docs Bruce Momjian
• 14:26   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Andrew Dunstan
• 14:55   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Michael Fuhr
• 15:39   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Andrew Dunstan
• 15:44   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Simon Riggs
• 15:54   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Tom Lane
• 16:15   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Andreas Pflug
• 18:01   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane
• 18:36   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Andrew Dunstan
• 19:00   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Greg Stark
• 19:10   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Magnus Hagander
• 19:55   Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) Simon Riggs
• 20:25   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane
• 20:33   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Stephen Frost
• 20:37   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Magnus Hagander
• 21:00   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Andrew Dunstan
• 22:13   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane
• 22:19   Re: More buildfarm stuff Andrew Dunstan
• 22:27   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Andrew Dunstan
• 22:40   Re: More buildfarm stuff Tom Lane
• 22:54   Re: More buildfarm stuff Larry Rosenman
• 23:16   Re: More buildfarm stuff Andrew Dunstan
• 23:32   suggested TODO: md5(bytea) Andrew Dunstan
• 23:39   Re: suggested TODO: md5(bytea) Andrew Dunstan
• 23:39   Re: More buildfarm stuff Larry Rosenman
• 23:44   Re: suggested TODO: md5(bytea) Michael Fuhr
• 23:47   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane

25 July 2005

• 00:02   Re: More buildfarm stuff Michael Fuhr
• 00:36   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Luke Lonergan
• 01:32   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Andrew Dunstan
• 03:08   Couple of minor buildfarm issues Tom Lane
• 03:46   Re: regression failure on stats test Tom Lane
• 07:43   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Magnus Hagander
• 11:45   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Andrew Dunstan
• 12:27   Re: regression failure on latest CVS ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 12:50   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Andrew Dunstan
• 13:54   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane
• 14:00   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Magnus Hagander
• 14:01   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 14:18   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Stephen Frost
• 14:37   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Bruce Momjian
• 14:47   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Magnus Hagander
• 14:52   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Magnus Hagander
• 15:15   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane
• 15:16   Re: regression failure on stats test Bruce Momjian
• 15:17   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane
• 15:27   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Bruce Momjian
• 15:28   Re: regression failure on stats test Tom Lane
• 16:13   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 16:48   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Tom Lane
• 16:58   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 17:02   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Andreas Pflug
• 17:12   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Tom Lane
• 17:19   Re: regression failure on latest CVS ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 17:24   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Andrew Dunstan
• 17:47   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 17:58   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 18:35   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Mark Wong
• 19:12   Re: regression failure on latest CVS ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 19:13   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 19:42   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Dave Page
• 21:11   ORDER BY  Marc G. Fournier
• 21:49   Re: More buildfarm stuff Jim C. Nasby
• 21:59   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Jim C. Nasby
• 21:59   Re: More buildfarm stuff Larry Rosenman
• 22:14   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Jim C. Nasby
• 22:21   Re: More buildfarm stuff Jim C. Nasby
• 22:48   Re: ORDER BY  Marc G. Fournier
• 23:18   Re: ORDER BY  Jeffrey W. Baker
• 23:28   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 23:44   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Andrew Dunstan
• 23:47   Re: ORDER BY  Tino Wildenhain
• 23:47   Re: ORDER BY  mark@mark.mielke.cc

26 July 2005

• 00:13   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Jim C. Nasby
• 00:26   Re: ORDER BY  Jim C. Nasby
• 00:29   Re: ORDER BY  Marc G. Fournier
• 00:29   Re: More buildfarm stuff Jim C. Nasby
• 00:29   Re: ORDER BY  Marc G. Fournier
• 00:40   Re: More buildfarm stuff Michael Fuhr
• 00:44   DROP GROUP leaves permissions a mess ... Marc G. Fournier
• 00:46   Re: More buildfarm stuff Jim C. Nasby
• 00:53   Re: ORDER BY  Jim C. Nasby
• 02:05   Re: ORDER BY  Matt Emmerton
• 02:07   Re: DROP GROUP leaves permissions a mess ... Alvaro Herrera
• 02:09   Re: DROP GROUP leaves permissions a mess ... Stephen Frost
• 02:15   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 02:16   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Andrew Dunstan
• 02:17   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 02:18   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Jim C. Nasby
• 03:26   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Tom Lane
• 03:56   Rollback issue with SET ROLE Tom Lane
• 04:28   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 13:48   Re: regression failure on latest CVS ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 13:56   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 14:21   Re: Rollback issue with SET ROLE Stephen Frost
• 14:39   Re: Rollback issue with SET ROLE Tom Lane
• 16:45   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Tom Lane
• 16:52   Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated Stephen Frost
• 19:11   Re: More buildfarm stuff Jim C. Nasby
• 19:14   Re: More buildfarm stuff Larry Rosenman
• 19:18   Re: More buildfarm stuff Tom Lane
• 19:44   Re: Segfault Exiting psql David Wheeler
• 20:17   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Magnus Hagander
• 20:22   ENUM type Jim C. Nasby
• 20:30   VACUUM DATABASE Simon Riggs
• 20:33   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane
• 20:52   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Magnus Hagander
• 20:53   Re: VACUUM DATABASE Alvaro Herrera
• 21:01   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Tom Lane
• 21:34   Re: More buildfarm stuff Andrew - Supernews
• 21:57   Interesting COPY edge case... Chris Browne
• 21:57   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 21:58   Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch Dave Page
• 22:14   Re: ENUM type Jochem van Dieten
• 22:28   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 22:36   RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 23:14   Re: ENUM type Jim C. Nasby
• 23:15   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 23:20   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 23:38   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 23:58   Re: ENUM type Andrew Dunstan
• 23:58   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr

27 July 2005

• 00:12   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 00:32   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 02:28   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 02:28   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Andrew Dunstan
• 02:44   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Larry Rosenman
• 02:53   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Michael Glaesemann
• 02:56   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Michael Glaesemann
• 03:07   Re: VACUUM DATABASE Tom Lane
• 03:09   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Andrew Dunstan
• 03:13   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Andrew Dunstan
• 03:38   Re: ENUM type Tom Lane
• 03:47   Duplicate object names in GRANT Gavin Sherry
• 03:58   psql as an execve(2) interpreter 
• 04:08   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Tom Lane
• 04:32   Re: psql as an execve(2) interpreter Tom Lane
• 04:33   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 04:41   Re: Duplicate object names in GRANT Tom Lane
• 04:56   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Tom Lane
• 05:18   Re: psql as an execve(2) interpreter 
• 06:12   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 06:34   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Neil Conway
• 07:19   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 08:41   Idea - optimising (left) joins? Dawid Kuroczko
• 09:08   Re: regression failure on latest CVS ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 09:28   Re: Idea - optimising (left) joins? Tino Wildenhain
• 11:05   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 11:35   Re: VACUUM DATABASE Robert Treat
• 13:17   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 13:33   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Andrew Dunstan
• 13:57   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 14:00   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 14:04   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 14:07   Re: More buildfarm stuff Palle Girgensohn
• 14:08   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 14:12   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Bruce Momjian
• 14:19   Re: Idea - optimising (left) joins? Stephan Szabo
• 15:26   Re: Interesting COPY edge case... Bruno Wolff III
• 15:30   Re: ENUM type Andrew Dunstan
• 18:23   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Andrew - Supernews
• 18:58   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Andrew Dunstan
• 19:53   Integrated autovacuum Joshua D. Drake
• 20:20   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 20:23   Re: Integrated autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 20:27   wal_buffer tests in Josh Berkus
• 20:52   Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Dave Page
• 21:07   Re: Integrated autovacuum Joshua D. Drake
• 21:09   Re: Integrated autovacuum Martín Marqués
• 21:20   Re: Integrated autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 21:23   Re: Integrated autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 21:40   Re: Integrated autovacuum Martín Marqués
• 21:41   Re: wal_buffer tests in Mark Wong
• 22:01   Some new list.c primitives Tom Lane
• 22:01   Re: wal_buffer tests in Simon Riggs
• 22:14   Re: Integrated autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 22:18   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 22:35   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 22:37   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 22:39   Re: Integrated autovacuum Josh Berkus
• 22:43   Re: VACUUM DATABASE Simon Riggs
• 22:46   Sanity Check? Larry Rosenman
• 22:52   Re: Sanity Check? Tom Lane
• 22:58   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 23:09   Re: VACUUM DATABASE Alvaro Herrera
• 23:32   Re: Sanity Check? Alvaro Herrera
• 23:47   Re: ORDER BY  Marc G. Fournier

28 July 2005

• 00:07   Re: Some new list.c primitives Gavin Sherry
• 00:12   Re: Sanity Check? Tom Lane
• 00:21   Autovacuum to-do list Alvaro Herrera
• 00:23   Re: ORDER BY  Josh Berkus
• 00:25   Re: Some new list.c primitives David Fetter
• 00:32   Re: Some new list.c primitives Tom Lane
• 01:39   Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 01:40   Re: Some new list.c primitives Neil Conway
• 01:42   Re: Autovacuum to-do list Gavin Sherry
• 02:31   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Josh Berkus
• 02:50   Re: Autovacuum to-do list Alvaro Herrera
• 02:56   Re: Some new list.c primitives Tom Lane
• 04:31   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Mark Wong
• 04:48   Possible planner deficiency? kris.shannon@gmail.com
• 05:11   Re: Some new list.c primitives Neil Conway
• 06:00   Re: Duplicate object names in GRANT Gavin Sherry
• 06:21   Re: VACUUM DATABASE Simon Riggs
• 07:26   Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Dave Page
• 09:05   Re: wal_buffer tests in Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 11:32   Re: snapshot build broken ... Robert Treat
• 11:49   Re: wal_buffer tests in Greg Stark
• 13:21   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 13:38   Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Dave Page
• 13:41   Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 14:44   Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Tom Lane
• 15:08   Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 15:17   Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Dave Page
• 15:44   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic documentation for ROLEs. Alvaro Herrera
• 17:15   Re: psql as an execve(2) interpreter Jonah H. Harris
• 17:50   Re: Some new list.c primitives Thomas Swan
• 17:51   Write past chunk end? Magnus Hagander
• 17:59   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic documentation for ROLEs. Tom Lane
• 18:09   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic documentation for ROLEs. Alvaro Herrera
• 18:12   Re: Write past chunk end? Alvaro Herrera
• 18:33   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic documentation for ROLEs. Tom Lane
• 18:43   Re: Some new list.c primitives Tom Lane
• 21:54   Re: wal_buffer tests in Josh Berkus
• 22:14   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Jim C. Nasby
• 22:20   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Jim C. Nasby
• 22:20   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Jim C. Nasby
• 22:33   Re: Interesting COPY edge case... Tom Lane
• 22:54   MySQL to PostgreSQL for SugarCRM Denis Lussier
• 23:15   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Mark Wong
• 23:15   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Mark Wong
• 23:48   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Jim C. Nasby
• 23:55   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Mark Wong

29 July 2005

• 00:00   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Mark Wong
• 03:12   Information Schema DBMS VERSION wrong Michael Fuhr
• 03:23   Re: Race conditions, race conditions! Qingqing Zhou
• 04:28   Re: Information Schema DBMS VERSION wrong Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Peter Eisentraut
• 14:35   Re: [PATCHES] Patch to fix plpython on OS X Tom Lane
• 14:47   Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Bruce Momjian
• 15:59   Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Dave Page
• 16:12   Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Tom Lane
• 17:33   Chocked ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 17:48   Re: Chocked Josh Berkus
• 17:50   Re: Chocked Darcy Buskermolen
• 19:39   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Jim C. Nasby
• 19:51   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Mark Wong
• 19:57   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Jim C. Nasby
• 20:11   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Mark Wong
• 20:44   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Josh Berkus
• 20:46   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Mark Wong
• 22:26   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Mark Wong
• 23:05   Re: Chocked Bruce Momjian
• 23:32   Re: Chocked Bruce Momjian

30 July 2005

• 00:46   Re: [Testperf-general] dbt2 & opteron performance Jim C. Nasby
• 01:41   Re: More buildfarm stuff Jim C. Nasby
• 02:42   Re: More buildfarm stuff Larry Rosenman
• 02:52   Re: PQescapeIdentifier Bruce Momjian
• 03:15   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Bruce Momjian
• 03:21   Re: Vacuum summary? Bruce Momjian
• 03:24   Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault Bruce Momjian
• 03:49   Re: bgwriter, inherited temp tables TODO items? Bruce Momjian
• 04:07   Re: Constraint Exclusion on all tables Bruce Momjian
• 04:20   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic documentation for ROLEs. Bruce Momjian
• 04:20   Updated open items Bruce Momjian
• 05:44   Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault David Fetter
• 06:08   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic documentation for ROLEs. Alvaro Herrera
• 06:42   Buildfarm's opsrey goes green... Rémi Zara
• 07:02   Re: Chocked Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:25   Re: Chocked Andreas Pflug
• 13:47   Win32 build broken by recent changes to xlog.c Magnus Hagander
• 13:48   Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault Andrew Dunstan
• 14:33   Re: Updated open items Andrew Dunstan
• 14:36   Re: Updated open items Bruce Momjian
• 14:37   Re: multibyte regression tests Bruce Momjian
• 14:51   Re: Updated open items Tom Lane
• 14:53   Re: Updated open items Bruce Momjian
• 16:56   Re: [PATCHES] Interval->day docs and regression tests Tom Lane
• 17:49   Re: Write past chunk end? Magnus Hagander
• 18:08   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive times for idle, interval, Rocco Altier
• 18:30   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive times Bruce Momjian
• 21:44   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive Andrew Dunstan
• 22:13   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive Larry Rosenman

31 July 2005

• 00:35   Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault David Fetter
• 00:42   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive Oliver Jowett
• 02:24   Re: MySQL to PostgreSQL for SugarCRM Denis Lussier
• 02:53   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive Larry Rosenman
• 03:39   Remote administration functionality Bruce Momjian
• 04:36   Re: Remote administration functionality Steve Atkins
• 04:47   Re: Remote administration functionality Alvaro Herrera
• 07:31   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive Tom Lane
• 08:54   Re: Remote administration functionality Dave Page
• 08:55   Re: Remote administration functionality Andreas Pflug
• 09:11   Re: Remote administration functionality Dave Page
• 09:31   Re: Remote administration functionality Andreas Pflug
• 10:54   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive Oliver Jowett
• 13:40   Re: Remote administration functionality Bruce Momjian
• 13:58   Re: Remote administration functionality Bruce Momjian
• 15:50   Re: Remote administration functionality Luke Lonergan
• 16:03   Re: Remote administration functionality Andrew Dunstan
• 16:16   Re: Remote administration functionality Dave Page
• 17:51   pg_dumpall --clean versus roles and shared dependencies Tom Lane