Re: RESULT_OID Bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin McArthur
Subject Re: RESULT_OID Bug
Date
Msg-id 005401c592fe$ab3d7fd0$0701a8c0@kdesktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RESULT_OID Bug  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sounds plausible.

Can anyone comment on whether the other instances of isnull=false being 
removed need to be reset to =false

Kevin McArthur
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Fuhr" <mike@fuhr.org>
To: "Kevin McArthur" <postgresql-list@stormtide.ca>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>; <andrew@supernews.com>; 
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RESULT_OID Bug


> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:20:29PM -0700, Kevin McArthur wrote:
>> Changing just the one appears to resolve the oid bug. Should probably 
>> talk
>> to neilc to see why he changed it.
>
> Initializing isnull to false in exec_stmt_getdiag() appears to fix
> the bug on my Solaris 9 box as well.  I'd guess the variations in
> behavior were due to different platforms having different garbage
> on the stack.
>
> -- 
> Michael Fuhr
> http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Sanity Check?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM DATABASE