Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

27 July 2005

• 00:12   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 00:32   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 02:28   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 02:28   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Andrew Dunstan
• 02:44   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Larry Rosenman
• 02:53   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Michael Glaesemann
• 02:56   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Michael Glaesemann
• 03:07   Re: VACUUM DATABASE Tom Lane
• 03:09   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Andrew Dunstan
• 03:13   Re: Couple of minor buildfarm issues Andrew Dunstan
• 03:38   Re: ENUM type Tom Lane
• 03:47   Duplicate object names in GRANT Gavin Sherry
• 03:58   psql as an execve(2) interpreter 
• 04:08   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Tom Lane
• 04:32   Re: psql as an execve(2) interpreter Tom Lane
• 04:33   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 04:41   Re: Duplicate object names in GRANT Tom Lane
• 04:56   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Tom Lane
• 05:18   Re: psql as an execve(2) interpreter 
• 06:12   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 06:34   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Neil Conway
• 07:19   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 08:41   Idea - optimising (left) joins? Dawid Kuroczko
• 09:08   Re: regression failure on latest CVS ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 09:28   Re: Idea - optimising (left) joins? Tino Wildenhain
• 11:05   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 11:35   Re: VACUUM DATABASE Robert Treat
• 13:17   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 13:33   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Andrew Dunstan
• 13:57   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 14:00   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 14:04   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 14:07   Re: More buildfarm stuff Palle Girgensohn
• 14:08   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman
• 14:12   Re: regression failure on latest CVS Bruce Momjian
• 14:19   Re: Idea - optimising (left) joins? Stephan Szabo
• 15:26   Re: Interesting COPY edge case... Bruno Wolff III
• 15:30   Re: ENUM type Andrew Dunstan
• 18:23   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Andrew - Supernews
• 18:58   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Andrew Dunstan
• 19:53   Integrated autovacuum Joshua D. Drake
• 20:20   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 20:23   Re: Integrated autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 20:27   wal_buffer tests in Josh Berkus
• 20:52   Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32 Dave Page
• 21:07   Re: Integrated autovacuum Joshua D. Drake
• 21:09   Re: Integrated autovacuum Martín Marqués
• 21:20   Re: Integrated autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 21:23   Re: Integrated autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 21:40   Re: Integrated autovacuum Martín Marqués
• 21:41   Re: wal_buffer tests in Mark Wong
• 22:01   Some new list.c primitives Tom Lane
• 22:01   Re: wal_buffer tests in Simon Riggs
• 22:14   Re: Integrated autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 22:18   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 22:35   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Michael Fuhr
• 22:37   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 22:39   Re: Integrated autovacuum Josh Berkus
• 22:43   Re: VACUUM DATABASE Simon Riggs
• 22:46   Sanity Check? Larry Rosenman
• 22:52   Re: Sanity Check? Tom Lane
• 22:58   Re: RESULT_OID Bug Kevin McArthur
• 23:09   Re: VACUUM DATABASE Alvaro Herrera
• 23:32   Re: Sanity Check? Alvaro Herrera
• 23:47   Re: ORDER BY  Marc G. Fournier