wal_buffer tests in - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject wal_buffer tests in
Date
Msg-id 200507271330.02083.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: wal_buffer tests in  (Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org>)
Re: wal_buffer tests in  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: wal_buffer tests in  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Folks,

I ran a wal_buffer test series.   It appears that increasing the
wal_buffers is indeed very important for OLTP applications, potentially
resulting in as much as a 15% average increase in transaction processing.
What's interesting is that this is not just true for 8.1, it's true for
8.0.3 as well.

More importantly, 8.1 performance is somehow back up to above-8.0 levels.
Something was broken in June that's got fixed (this test series is based
on July 3 CVS) but I don't know what.  Clues?

Test results are here:
http://pgfoundry.org/docman/view.php/1000041/79/wal_buffer_test.pdf

As always, detailed test results are available from OSDL, just use:
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/#
where # is the test number.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Integrated autovacuum
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32