Re: RESULT_OID Bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: RESULT_OID Bug
Date
Msg-id 42E7D935.90105@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RESULT_OID Bug  (Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Andrew - Supernews wrote:

>On 2005-07-27, Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> wrote:
>  
>
>>So far the problem does seem to be specific to whatever PL/pgSQL's
>>is doing, and it affects ROW_COUNT as well as RESULT_OID.  I haven't
>>been able to reproduce the problem with PL/Tcl or with C and SPI.
>>    
>>
>
>src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c, function exec_stmt_getdiag, uninitialized
>variable "isnull".
>
>  
>

nice catch. I see the "= false" removed in about 5 places in this 
change: 
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c.diff?r1=1.146;r2=1.147

Is this the only one that matters?

cheers

(another) andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew - Supernews
Date:
Subject: Re: RESULT_OID Bug
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Integrated autovacuum