Re: Sanity Check? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Sanity Check?
Date
Msg-id 13285.1122509530@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sanity Check?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Why does the sanity check test start with a VACUUM?  Why not a VACUUM
> FULL?

The test predates the existence of VACUUM FULL ;-); so that's what it
did originally.  I think I deliberately left it as-is during the 7.2
devel cycle, so that the new lazy-vacuum code would get exercised.

I don't see any strong reason to change it now ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: Some new list.c primitives
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Autovacuum to-do list