Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Date
Msg-id 8407.1120795961@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> If so, please undo the previous patch (which disabled page dumping
>> entirely) and instead try removing this block of code, starting
>> at about xlog.c line 620 in CVS tip:

> Will do.  Results in a few days.

Great.  BTW, don't bother testing snapshots between 2005/07/05 2300 EDT
and just now --- Bruce's full_page_writes patch introduced a large
random negative component into the timing ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's?
Next
From: James William Pye
Date:
Subject: Re: process crash when a plpython function returns