Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion
Date
Msg-id 42D1E7E9.4050809@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Looking further ... we already do this implicitly for prodesc in the 
> call handler - we would just need to do the same thing for per-call 
> structures and divorce them from prodesc, which can be repeated on the 
> implicit stack.
> 
> I'll work on that - changes should be quite small.

Sounds like recursive calls are somethign that should be tested for PLs 
in the regressions...

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing domain input