* Robert Treat (xzilla@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
> On Friday 01 July 2005 13:07, Stephen Frost wrote:
> However On Friday 01 July 2005 13:02, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) wrote:
> > > Stupid question, but how do roles relate to our existing "groups"?
> >
> > Uhhh. There are no longer "groups", they've been replaced with roles
> > (which can have members).
> >
>
> Was following this conversation up till now, because these two statement seem
> to contradict each other. Do we really support groups still, are is CREATE
> GROUP now syntactical sugar for some for of CREATE ROLE.
CREATE GROUP just does a CREATE ROLE now, yeah. You can check gram.y
for the details if you'd like. We do still support \du and \dg
(pg_users and pg_groups respectively, iirc) for backwards compat. and to
help folks get used to the new stuff.
Thanks,
Stephen
