Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Date
Msg-id 200507261735.23694.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> I have no idea whether the DBT benchmarks would benefit at all, but
> given that they are affected positively by increasing wal_buffers,
> they must have a fair percentage of not-small transactions.

Even if they don't, we'll have series tests for DW here at GreenPlum soon, 
and I'll bet they'd affect *those*.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin McArthur"
Date:
Subject: Re: RESULT_OID Bug
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: RESULT_OID Bug