Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Fuhr
Subject Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved
Date
Msg-id 20050711155100.GA77601@winnie.fuhr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved  (Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 06:41:35PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> When I saw that only 0.9.7[efg] have new signature I even
> considered macrofying that.  But now with 0.9.8 again different
> I really would like to not to touch it, as I have no idea which
> one will be the stable signature.
> 
> Comments?

Sounds like a question for the OpenSSL developers.  If a search
through their list archives or CVS repository doesn't yield the
answer, then maybe asking the question on one of their lists will.

-- 
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved
Next
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved