Re: Vacuum summary? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Vacuum summary?
Date
Msg-id 1121150862.3970.98.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum summary?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Vacuum summary?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 12:38 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > 
> >>What do you guys think of having a vacuum summary command? E.g.;
> > 
> > 
> >>VACUUM [FULL] [ANALYZE] SUMMARY
> > 
> > 
> > ... that will turn SUMMARY into a fully reserved word ...
> 
> Hmmm... good point. Other options would be:
> 
> brief
> short
> terse?
> nutshell ;)
> review
> report -- This one is interesting although sufffers from the same problem.
> 

Good idea. I think its a good idea to make that info easily accessible.

How about putting this in the logfile, without any command changes?

Best Regards, Simon Riggs



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum summary?