Re: Vacuum summary? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Vacuum summary?
Date
Msg-id 42D2CA9D.7090501@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum summary?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Vacuum summary?
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> 
>>What do you guys think of having a vacuum summary command? E.g.;
> 
> 
>>VACUUM [FULL] [ANALYZE] SUMMARY
> 
> 
> ... that will turn SUMMARY into a fully reserved word ...

Hmmm... good point. Other options would be:

brief
short
terse?
nutshell ;)
review
report -- This one is interesting although sufffers from the same problem.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>                http://archives.postgresql.org


-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion