Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?
Date
Msg-id 42D2CA2C.40107@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> 
>>>Does the dev machine run more than one postmaster?
> 
> 
>>No.
> 
> 
> Hmm, it should be pretty impossible to see this if the machine's just
> been rebooted

It wasn't a reboot it was a total power loss and then startup.
 and there are no other postmasters running.  If you can
> replicate it, could you send along the output of "ipcs -m -a" along
> with the contents of the postmaster.pid file?

I will give it a shot a little later today.
  Also, what's the platform
> exactly?

FC3.

J


> 
>             regards, tom lane


-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum summary?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum summary?