On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:17:49PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> >Then I guess the question is... is it more valuable to have a working
> >buildfarm environment for 7.2 and 7.3, or is the obnoxious failure
> >better to spur someone into looking at it? :) Should this maybe be made
> >a TODO and I'll adjust my config until someone tackles the TODO?
> >
> >
>
> I don't think 7.2 and 7.3 deserve heroic efforts to get every possible
> build in a green state. The main reason to run buildfarm at all on these
> branches is to make sure that any maintenance changes don't break things.
OK, I'll tweak cuckoo's config accordingly then.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
