* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > Perhaps the specification isn't but I'm pretty sure other
> > implementations follow the SET ROLE -> current authorization
> > identifier (and thus dropping other rights granted to the CURRENT_USER).
>
> My current reading of 4.31 is that SET ROLE *doesn't* drop rights, which
> means we need to rethink all of this. However, on this point:
Yeah, it seems to add them. Honestly, my recollection from working on
Oracle is that you have access to all the roles you've been granted when
you connect as a user. If it'd be useful I'd be happy to see about
finding out exactly what Oracle does in this regard and if it actually
follows the specification or what.
> > It's in 4.34.1.1, at least in the SQL2003 specification, and it reads:
> > "This stack is maintained using a "last-in, first-out" discipline, and
> > effectively only the top cell is visible.
>
> Yes, but the only events that push or pop stack entries are entry/exit
> of an external procedure (think SECURITY DEFINER procedure). SET ROLE
> doesn't push or pop anything, it just alters the current top entry.
> (Which must in fact be the *only* entry, given that SET ROLE is only
> allowed at outer level...)
Alright, that would make the later language make more sense.
Thanks,
Stephen
