Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Wong
Subject Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Date
Msg-id 200507251834.j6PIYgjA002334@smtp.osdl.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:11:36 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> BTW, I'd like to look at 302906, but its [Details] link is broken.

Ugh, I tried digging onto the internal systems and it looks like they
were destroyed (or not saved) somehow.  It'll have to be rerun. 
Sorry...

Mark


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated
Next
From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Date:
Subject: Re: regression failure on latest CVS