* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> My understanding of things is that per spec, a SECURITY DEFINER function
> can be owned by either a user or a role, and so within the function
> either CURRENT_USER or CURRENT_ROLE would return the owner and the other
> would return NULL. Emulating this would require a hard distinction
> between users and roles that is simply not there in our implementation,
> which is why I think they should both return the owner.
I would have been more inclined to just pick one and always set it and
leave the other always null. For that, CURRENT_USER would be more
backwards-compatible, but for our implementation I'd tend to think
CURRENT_ROLE is more appropriate. That'd follow the spec closer and
would be closer to what functions written to the spec would expect.
I don't use SECURITY DEFINER functions much though so perhaps others
have a stronger opinion. I've been a bit suprised at the lack of
commentary from other people, perhaps they're just waiting to destroy
whatever we come up with once it's actually been implemented. :)
> To some extent SET ROLE ALL can be emulated by ALTER USER ... INHERIT.
Yeah, but that affects all sessions too, not just a single one, which
makes it quite a different thing.
> I'm of two minds about whether an unprivileged user should be allowed
> to adjust his own rolinherit flag --- in most cases it seems pretty
> harmless (and Oracle evidently thinks it is) --- but one could imagine
> that the roles have been set up on the assumption that you can't get
> more than one role's privileges at a time. INHERIT (or SET ROLE ALL)
> would break that assumption, and perhaps allow people to do unwanted
> stuff.
This is actually what I was thinking about when I was saying at some
point prior in this thread that we should have an option to indicate if
SET ROLE ALL is allowed or not. I don't think that users should be
allowed to adjust their own rolinherit flag. I think the default should
probably be 'true', even for users, but if an admin sets it to false
then I think that should be enforced and users shouldn't be allowed to
change it.
I suspect it's possible to disable 'SET ROLE ALL' in Oracle, and to turn
off having it done upon connection. I'd be somewhat suprised if it
wasn't possible but I havn't really investigated it either way. I don't
know if Oracle has a way to let you do it per-user/per-role though.
Thanks,
Stephen
