Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH
Date
Msg-id 42E14F39.7030408@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
List pgsql-hackers

Bruno Wolff III wrote:

>On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:27:50 -0700,
>  Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>Apparently, the Gregorian calendar has been fixed.  From this:
>>http://www.physics.uq.edu.au/people/ross/phys2081/time/calendar.htm
>>
>>We have this:
>>"The Gregorian calendar has been modified since (before anything could
>>go wrong) to bring the Gregorian 365.2425 down to 365.2422 by cutting
>>out "leap centuries" that are divisible by 4000 thus giving an accuracy
>>of about one day in 20,000 years"
>>    
>>
>
>That's interesting. So now we will have a year 4000 problem when there
>isn't a leap year as was previously scheduled.
>
>
>  
>

remind me about that when we're a bit closer to the date.

cheers

andrew (who wasted a year of his life on y2k crap).


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC