Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?
Date
Msg-id 42D2C320.6010507@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?
List pgsql-hackers
>>Power off on a dev machine ;)
> 
> 
> Does the dev machine run more than one postmaster?

No.
  I've occasionally
> seen similar issues when restarting a clutch of dev postmasters ---
> the kernel may assign a shmem id to one of them that belonged to another
> one in the previous cycle, and if you already started that other one
> then the second gets confused.  8.0 and up have a test that should deal
> correctly with this; what version did you see failing exactly?

This is on my personal dev machine and I am running 8.1Dev.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
>             regards, tom lane


-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Vacuum summary?