Re: More buildfarm stuff - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Palle Girgensohn
Subject Re: More buildfarm stuff
Date
Msg-id C08FCE703AE498F4B1E5C4DF@palle.girgensohn.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: More buildfarm stuff  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
--On tisdag, juli 19, 2005 15.11.31 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 
wrote:

> "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-07/msg00096.php describes
>> what I think is causing octopus to fail. What's also interesting is
>> these patches from the FreeBSD port:
>
> None of those patches are necessary; if they were, we'd be seeing the
> failures at the build stage, not at runtime.
>
>             regards, tom lane


Hi,

If memory serves me, the pic patches has something to do with the fact that 
on some versions of FreeBSD's perl port, there was no shared library 
version on libperl built, only a static one. I believe that if there was 
only a static libperl.a, the PIC helped so that ``createlang plperl'' 
worked.

It could also have something to do with amd64?

Anyway, the patch *is* needed in some circumstances, and is a noop in 
other. Sorry I can't be more helpful about what the patch is good for... ;-)

/Palle



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Trout
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems compiling Postgresql 8.0.3 on 10.4
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines