Re: regression failure on latest CVS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Larry Rosenman
Subject Re: regression failure on latest CVS
Date
Msg-id E1DxPqj-00026f-Rm@lerami.lerctr.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: regression failure on latest CVS
List pgsql-hackers
On Jul 26 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > FWIW, I just checked that CVS tip works OK for me without these options,
> > with either integer or float timestamps.  I don't see any new warnings,
> > either.
> > It could well be that the recent changes have introduced some
> > portability problem in the interval code, but someone's going to have to
> > actually dig for it :-(
> >
> That's my feeling but I have no clue where to start.
> I know this was introduced at the end of last week.

I'm confident the SCO Compiler guys will get to the bottom of it :)

They've got all the info they need, as far as I know, as well as
access to my box.

LER


-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Date:
Subject: Re: regression failure on latest CVS
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Rollback issue with SET ROLE