Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> If it did produce different output, why haven't we noticed it prior to
>> this? Has there actually *been* a problem that nobody has reported?
>>
> Is autoconf actually run as part of any of our packaging scripts?
I don't think so ... but if Marc is the one to stamp a release number
into configure.in, his resulting configure might vary from other
people's versions, if the local autoconf on that machine is not
standard.
regards, tom lane
