Re: Order by optimisations? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Order by optimisations?
Date
Msg-id 42D74CCE.3030609@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Order by optimisations?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Well, date evidently isn't the high-order key of this index.  But why
> exactly are you worried about a sort of 2 rows?

Aha that's nailed it:

usa=> explain select * from users_myfoods_map where user_id=1 and date 
between '2003-11-03' and '2003-11-03' order by user_id, date;                                                 QUERY
PLAN
 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Index
Scanusing users_myfoods_map_user_id_date_key on 
 
users_myfoods_map  (cost=0.00..3.78 rows=1 width=22)   Index Cond: ((user_id = 1) AND (date >= '2003-11-03'::date) AND

(date <= '2003-11-03'::date))
(2 rows)


I don't care about this particular result.  But imagine it running 
thousands of times a minute, with result sets between 0 and 50 rows...

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Order by optimisations?
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: pg_get_prepared?