Tom Lane wrote:
>"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
>
>
>>On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:11:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>None of those patches are necessary; if they were, we'd be seeing the
>>>failures at the build stage, not at runtime.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Anyone have any ideas on why octopus is failing then?
>>
>>
>
>Well, the original report said that we needed to link the backend with
>libc_r instead of libc to make libpython happy. If there's not a
>separate "libpthread" on your machine then that may well be the case.
>The question then is whether we are prepared to do that (and risk
>unknown consequences in performance and stability) to support plpython.
>
>
>
>
Wouldn't it be odd if that were the case for python but not perl?
cheers
andrew
