Re: ORDER BY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeffrey W. Baker
Subject Re: ORDER BY
Date
Msg-id 1122330174.10601.0.camel@toonses.gghcwest.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to ORDER BY  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: ORDER BY
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 19:08 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 18:11 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >> Just curious as to whether or not a warning or something should be issued
> >> in a case like:
> >>
> >>    SELECT c.*
> >>      FROM company c, company_summary cs
> >>     WHERE c.id = cs.id
> >>       AND cs.detail = 'test'
> >> ORDER BY cs.fullname;
> >
> > Seems like it should work.  Is it not returning in fullname order in
> > your tests?
> 
> Full name isn't a field in the results, so how would it be ORDERing based 
> on it?  fullname is a field in the table being joined in order to restrict 
> the results to just those with cs.detail = 'test' ... but company itself 
> doesn't have a field fullname ...

I'm still not seeing the problem.  cs.fullname is in the product of the
join, and you can order the result thereby, and not return the column.

-jwb


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: ORDER BY
Next
From: "Larry Rosenman"
Date:
Subject: Re: regression failure on latest CVS