Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?
Date
Msg-id 26254.1120452223@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> OK.  Does anybody else have thoughts on removing the PG_ARGISNULL()
> checks?  Neil suggests removing them because they'd be unnecessary,
> but I'm concerned about people who'd use the new code with old
> catalog entries that aren't STRICT (e.g., restored from a dump).

I concur with leaving them in for awhile.  They aren't all that
expensive ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Schedule for release 8.1