On 7/7/05, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> > It would need to be a fairly strong one, given that they basically
> > violate the relational model. If what you're really interested in
> > is XML data support, then I'd suggest focusing on that instead.
>
> XML data support would be best if coordinated. There are several
> different projects right now, and one more would be bad.
>
David,
Can you enumerate or refer to these *apparently*
uncoordianted/disparate XML data support projects? I would also
appreciate any progress/status information on 'em, if possible.
Thanks,
Affan Bin Salman,
Lead Database Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation.
mailto: affan@enterprisedb.com
blog: http://affans.blogspot.com
