Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 January 2001

• 01:35   Re: Upper limit on number of buffers? Andrew McMillan
• 02:01   Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Hannu Krosing
• 02:50   Current Sources/UW7.1.1 Larry Rosenman
• 10:33   Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING" Chih-Chang Hsieh
• 17:16   Re: pg_dumpall (7.1beta1, current CVS) Tom Lane
• 17:19   Re: Current Sources/UW7.1.1 Tom Lane
• 17:52   RE: Current Sources/UW7.1.1 Lawrence E. Rosenman
• 22:40   Re: PRIMARY KEY and INHERITANCE Ferruccio Zamuner

2 January 2001

• 00:05   Re: pg_dumpall (7.1beta1, current CVS) Larry Rosenman
• 00:05   Re: Current Sources/UW7.1.1 Larry Rosenman
• 01:43   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
• 01:46   Re: how do i store \0 inside a text attribute? Bruce Momjian
• 01:57   Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 01:59   Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 02:08   Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Rod Taylor
• 02:09   RE: PHP and PostgreSQL Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:12   Ignored PostgreSQL SET command Patrick Dunford
• 03:00   Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 03:16   Re: Current Sources/UW7.1.1 Tom Lane
• 03:20   Re: Current Sources/UW7.1.1 Larry Rosenman
• 03:26   Re: Current Sources/UW7.1.1 Tom Lane
• 03:30   Re: Using Threads? Myron Scott
• 04:54   Re: Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Robert B. Easter
• 05:14   Re: Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Thomas Lockhart
• 05:21   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 05:47   Re: Ignored PostgreSQL SET command Thomas Lockhart
• 05:58   Re: Using Threads? Karel Zak
• 06:00   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Bruce Momjian
• 06:00   Re: Ignored PostgreSQL SET command Oliver Elphick
• 06:05   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Alfred Perlstein
• 06:07   Re: Using Threads? Myron Scott
• 10:37   Re: Current Sources/UW7.1.1 Larry Rosenman
• 11:15   Re: Using Threads? mlw
• 11:29   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL mlw
• 13:42   Re: Using Threads? Myron Scott
• 13:53   Re: Using Threads? Alfred Perlstein
• 14:44   Re: Using Threads? Myron Scott
• 15:07   NetBSD libedit (Re: GNU readline and BSD license) Peter Eisentraut
• 15:25   Re: Using Threads? Alfred Perlstein
• 15:49   Re: Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src (Makefile.global.in) Peter Eisentraut
• 18:25   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src (Makefile.global.in) Tom Lane
• 18:53   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src (Makefile.global.in) Ian Lance Taylor
• 20:49   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Patrick Welche
• 21:11   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Patrick Welche
• 21:44   problem with mkMakefile.tcldefs.sh if USE_TCL=false jmoschet@netscape.net
• 22:00   Re: Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x Alfred Perlstein

3 January 2001

• 00:29   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
• 00:30   Re: GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
• 03:16   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Tom Samplonius
• 04:07   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 05:25   Please review TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 07:33   Re: Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Hannu Krosing
• 11:43   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Frank Joerdens
• 13:53   Re: Please review TODO list Peter Eisentraut
• 14:40   Re: Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: Re: [DOCS] Inheritance docs error. Peter Eisentraut
• 18:23   V7.0 Error: OID ##### no longer exists in pg_databas e Barnes, Sandy (Sandra)
• 18:55   Re: V7.0 Error: OID ##### no longer exists in pg_databas e Tom Lane

4 January 2001

• 01:00   Re: Please review TODO list Philip Warner
• 03:15   Weirdness in CHECK? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:19   Re: Please review TODO list Tom Lane
• 03:27   Re: Weirdness in CHECK? Tom Lane
• 03:35   Re: Weirdness in CHECK? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:38   Re: Please review TODO list Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:10   Re: Please review TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 06:14   Re: Please review TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 06:25   Re: Please review TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 08:06   Strange think with DROP DATABASE Partyka Robert
• 08:56   Re: Strange think with DROP DATABASE Partyka Robert
• 15:30   Re: [ADMIN] problem with mkMakefile.tcldefs.sh if USE_TCL=false Peter Eisentraut
• 16:02   Re: [ADMIN] problem with mkMakefile.tcldefs.sh if USE_TCL=false jmoschet@netscape.net
• 18:23   Missing ColLabel tokens Peter Eisentraut
• 19:25   md5 c code Ron Peterson
• 19:44   Re: Missing ColLabel tokens Tom Lane
• 20:28   Re: Missing ColLabel tokens Peter Eisentraut
• 21:24   Re: Missing ColLabel tokens Tom Lane
• 23:00   time + date_part oddness? Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:19   RE: [GENERAL] pg_dump return status.. Matthew
• 23:39   Re: RE: [GENERAL] pg_dump return status.. Philip Warner
• 23:49   Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump return status.. Tom Lane

5 January 2001

• 00:56   Cobol TO SQL To PostgreSQL Luis Fernando Fabara M.
• 02:19   bit_length() Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:21   Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Tom Lane
• 04:48   Re: time + date_part oddness? Thomas Lockhart
• 05:29   Re: Missing ColLabel tokens Thomas Lockhart
• 05:29   Re: Re: time + date_part oddness? Tom Lane
• 05:37   Re: Re: time + date_part oddness? Thomas Lockhart
• 05:39   Re: Re: time + date_part oddness? Tom Lane
• 05:54   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:52   Re: Missing ColLabel tokens Hannu Krosing
• 09:04   Re: Please review TODO list Hannu Krosing
• 11:25   Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump return status.. Philip Warner
• 14:22   Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump return status.. Tom Lane
• 17:30   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Alex Pilosov
• 17:38   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Tom Lane
• 17:44   Recursion and SPI Ian Lance Taylor
• 18:44   RE: Recursion and SPI Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:13   Re: Recursion and SPI Ian Lance Taylor
• 20:17   Re: pg_dump return status.. ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:26   Re: pg_dump return status.. Ian Lance Taylor
• 20:27   bootstrap tables Ross J. Reedstrom
• 20:34   Beta2 ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 20:49   RE: Beta2 ... ? Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:56   Re: Beta2 ... ? Tom Lane
• 21:03   Re: Recursion and SPI Tom Lane
• 21:11   Re: Beta2 ... ? mike
• 21:13   Re: pg_dump return status.. Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: bootstrap tables Tom Lane
• 21:35   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
• 21:48   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
• 22:17   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Tom Lane
• 22:32   Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:47   Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? Tom Lane
• 22:47   Re: bootstrap tables Ross J. Reedstrom
• 22:57   Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? Hiroshi Inoue

6 January 2001

• 00:42   Re: bootstrap tables Peter Eisentraut
• 00:46   Re: Beta2 ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 01:01   replacing shmem Valter Mazzola
• 01:52   Re: replacing shmem Tom Lane
• 02:02   RE: replacing shmem Andrew Snow
• 02:54   Re: replacing shmem Tom Samplonius
• 14:06   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Roderick A. Anderson
• 17:13   Open documentation items Peter Eisentraut
• 18:24   is_view seems unnecessarily slow Tom Lane
• 18:30   global/pg_database ? Patrick Welche
• 18:34   initdb prob Patrick Welche
• 18:37   initdb prob Patrick Welche
• 18:43   ERROR: cannot find attribute 10 of??? ineck
• 18:50   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Emmanuel Charpentier
• 18:53   Distribute tables over disks Sergey E. Volkov
• 19:51   Re: global/pg_database ? Tom Lane
• 19:54   pg_restore options issues Peter Eisentraut
• 19:57   CVS regression test failure on OBSD bpalmer
• 20:15   Re: CVS regression test failure on OBSD Tom Lane
• 21:36   Re: CVS regression test failure on OBSD bpalmer
• 21:45   Re: CVS regression test failure on OBSD Tom Lane
• 21:59   I'm amazed we never caught this before ... Tom Lane
• 22:04   Re: I'm amazed we never caught this before ... The Hermit Hacker
• 22:41   Re: CVS regression test failure on OBSD bpalmer
• 22:47   Re: pg_restore options issues Philip Warner
• 23:09   Re: Re: I'm amazed we never caught this before ... Tom Lane
• 23:17   Re: CVS regression test failure on OBSD Tom Lane

7 January 2001

• 00:12   Re: CVS regression test failure on OBSD Peter Eisentraut
• 00:15   Re: CVS regression test failure on OBSD Tom Lane
• 01:51   beta2 bundled ... will officially announce sunday evening ... The Hermit Hacker
• 02:48   Re: beta2 bundled ... will officially announce sunday evening ... Tom Lane
• 02:58   Re: beta2 bundled ... will officially announce sunday evening ... The Hermit Hacker
• 02:58   Oops, looks like query cancel is busted Tom Lane
• 03:01   Re: beta2 bundled ... will officially announce sunday evening ... Tom Lane
• 03:21   Re: beta2 bundled ... will officially announce sunday evening ... The Hermit Hacker
• 04:12   Re: Re: [SQL] renaming columns... danger? Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:15   Re: Re: [SQL] renaming columns... danger? Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:55   Re: Re: [SQL] renaming columns... danger? Philip Warner
• 06:52   Suggested fix for pg_dump Philip Warner
• 07:36   Quite strange crash Denis Perchine
• 09:21   Re: md5 c code Marko Kreen
• 09:24   Re: Suggested fix for pg_dump The Hermit Hacker
• 09:42   A post-7.1 wish-list. Emmanuel Charpentier
• 11:35   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Oliver Elphick
• 11:41   Re: pg_restore options issues Oliver Elphick
• 13:55   Re: pg_restore options issues Peter Eisentraut
• 14:42   Re: A post-7.1 wish-list. Peter Eisentraut
• 15:08   Re: A post-7.1 wish-list. Horst Herb
• 16:05   Re: Suggested fix for pg_dump Tom Lane
• 16:09   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 16:18   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Tom Lane
• 16:20   Re: Suggested fix for pg_dump The Hermit Hacker
• 16:29   Re: Suggested fix for pg_dump Tom Lane
• 16:34   Re: Suggested fix for pg_dump The Hermit Hacker
• 17:04   Re: CVS regression test failure on OBSD bpalmer
• 19:14   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
• 19:38   heap_update is broken in current sources Tom Lane
• 20:10   Should heap_update/heap_delete hold buffer locks while toasting? Tom Lane
• 20:15   Re: CVS regression test failure on OBSD Peter Eisentraut
• 20:33   Re: CVS regression test failure on OBSD bpalmer
• 22:26   patch: contrib/pgcrypto sanity Marko Kreen
• 23:09   Re: patch: contrib/pgcrypto sanity Tom Lane
• 23:13   RE: Suggested fix for pg_dump Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 23:32   ALL, ANY bug? Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:55   Re: patch: contrib/pgcrypto sanity Marko Kreen

8 January 2001

• 01:06   Re: ALL, ANY bug? Tom Lane
• 04:38   Re: Quite strange crash Denis Perchine
• 05:14   Re: ALL, ANY bug? Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:14   Re: patch: contrib/pgcrypto sanity Marko Kreen
• 06:26   Re: ALL, ANY bug? Tom Lane
• 07:13   Re: ALL, ANY bug? Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:36   Re: pg_dump return status.. Pete Forman
• 08:03   Re: patch: contrib/pgcrypto sanity Pete Forman
• 08:30   Re: pg_dump return status.. Philip Warner
• 09:16   Re: pg_dump return status.. Pete Forman
• 09:21   Re: patch: contrib/pgcrypto sanity Marko Kreen
• 12:30   Re: heap_update is broken in current sources The Hermit Hacker
• 13:26   Re: heap_update is broken in current sources Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: pg_dump return status.. Tom Lane
• 13:53   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 13:56   Re: heap_update is broken in current sources The Hermit Hacker
• 14:10   Re: Quite strange crash Denis Perchine
• 14:57   Re: bootstrap tables Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:21   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 16:34   Re: is_view seems unnecessarily slow Jan Wieck
• 16:34   Re: Should heap_update/heap_delete hold buffer locks while toasting? Jan Wieck
• 17:00   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Tom Lane
• 22:10   Re: Quite strange crash ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 23:07   Compaq open source database benchmark Bruce Momjian
• 23:25   Dec TRU64/PG 7.1 Larry Rosenman

9 January 2001

• 00:26   README.mb Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:15   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Bruce Momjian
• 01:41   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 02:03   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Tom Lane
• 02:17   Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten Bruce Momjian
• 02:22   Re: README.mb Tom Lane
• 02:25   Re: Dec TRU64/PG 7.1 Tom Lane
• 03:47   Re: V7.0 Error: OID ##### no longer exists in pg_databas e Bruce Momjian
• 03:52   Re: Quite strange crash Denis Perchine
• 04:04   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 04:11   Re: Quite strange crash Denis Perchine
• 04:23   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 04:26   RE: Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 04:40   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 04:58   RE: Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 05:26   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 05:33   Re: Quite strange crash Alfred Perlstein
• 06:26   Re: Quite strange crash Vadim Mikheev
• 07:45   tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:01   Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL web page The Hermit Hacker
• 11:11   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL web page Bruce Momjian
• 11:19   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL web page The Hermit Hacker
• 11:48   Re: bit_length() Bruce Momjian
• 11:50   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Bruce Momjian
• 12:24   Re: [PATCHES] Re: Recursion and SPI Bruce Momjian
• 12:26   Re: pg_dump return status.. Bruce Momjian
• 13:04   Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 13:21   Re: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL web page Vince Vielhaber
• 14:07   Re: patch: contrib/pgcrypto sanity Bruce Momjian
• 14:21   Re: README.mb Bruce Momjian
• 14:44   AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:04   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 15:41   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 16:01   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Bruce Momjian
• 16:11   RE: Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:25   Re: Quite strange crash Denis Perchine
• 16:28   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 16:29   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 16:44   Re: Quite strange crash Denis Perchine
• 16:50   RE: Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:07   How to print explain using PHP Martin A. Marques
• 17:22   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 17:25   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 17:31   Re: How to print explain using PHP Karel Zak
• 17:40   Re: How to print explain using PHP Martin A. Marques
• 17:44   Re: How to print explain using PHP Bruce Momjian
• 17:53   Re: How to print explain using PHP Karel Zak
• 17:58   Re: How to print explain using PHP Bruce Momjian
• 18:01   Re: How to print explain using PHP Karel Zak
• 18:06   Re: Quite strange crash ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:28   Re: Quite strange crash Tom Lane
• 19:40   RE: Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:26   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Michael J Schout
• 21:01   BETWEEN [SYMMETRIC | ASYMMETRIC] Robert B. Easter
• 21:13   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
• 21:53   SIMILAR TO for regular expressions Robert B. Easter
• 21:58   Re: BETWEEN [SYMMETRIC | ASYMMETRIC] Tom Lane
• 22:29   Re: BETWEEN [SYMMETRIC | ASYMMETRIC] Robert B. Easter
• 22:31   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:37   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Tom Lane
• 22:45   Re: BETWEEN [SYMMETRIC | ASYMMETRIC] Tom Lane

10 January 2001

• 00:00   Re: [GENERAL] Re: How to print explain using PHP Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:32   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Bruce Momjian
• 00:32   Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now Bruce Momjian
• 08:29   AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:09   GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 12:16   ... Oleg Bartunov
• 12:21   RD-Tree, index support for int array (contrib-intarray) Oleg Bartunov
• 12:41   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 13:45   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Pete Forman
• 14:10   Re: BETWEEN [SYMMETRIC | ASYMMETRIC] Thomas Swan
• 14:36   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:46   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 15:03   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
• 15:27   AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:48   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 16:04   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
• 16:43   psql -l bug Olivier PRENANT
• 16:54   Re: psql -l bug Martin A. Marques
• 16:55   Re: psql -l bug Larry Rosenman
• 16:56   Re: psql -l bug Olivier PRENANT
• 19:05   Re: psql -l bug Larry Rosenman
• 19:05   Re: psql -l bug Olivier PRENANT
• 21:26   still no log Martin A. Marques
• 22:07   Re: still no log Oliver Elphick
• 22:14   Interesting CERT advisory Mike Mascari
• 22:21   Re: still no log Martin A. Marques
• 22:49   RE: Re: still no log Craig L. Ching

11 January 2001

• 00:49   Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 01:11   Re: Re: BETWEEN [SYMMETRIC | ASYMMETRIC] Tom Lane
• 01:14   Re: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 01:26   Re: Interesting CERT advisory Thomas Lockhart
• 02:19   PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... The Hermit Hacker
• 02:25   Re: global/pg_database ? Tom Lane
• 02:28   Re: ERROR: cannot find attribute 10 of??? missive@localhost.net (Lee Harr)
• 02:32   Re: A post-7.1 wish-list. Emmanuel Charpentier
• 02:34   Re: A post-7.1 wish-list. Manuel Cabido
• 02:40   Re: A post-7.1 wish-list. Emmanuel Charpentier
• 02:49   Re: still no log Alfonso Peniche
• 02:53   Install Failure [7.1beta2 tarballs] Thomas Swan
• 02:53   pgaccess and LIMIT? Pavel@Janik.cz (Pavel Janík ml.)
• 02:56   PostgreSQL web page Kaare Rasmussen
• 03:03   RE: A post-7.1 wish-list. Andrew Snow
• 05:23   Re: A post-7.1 wish-list. Tom Samplonius
• 05:44   Lock on arbitrary string feature Lincoln Yeoh
• 07:05   AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:10   Re: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 08:25   AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:56   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 10:42   drop table and pg_proc Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:55   Re: drop table and pg_proc mlw
• 11:22   Re: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Pete Forman
• 11:52   Re: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
• 12:05   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
• 12:09   Re: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Pete Forman
• 12:15   UNDER? Robert B. Easter
• 12:28   Re: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
• 13:02   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 13:06   Re: Re: BETWEEN [SYMMETRIC | ASYMMETRIC] Thomas Swan
• 13:08   Re: UNDER? Hannu Krosing
• 13:17   Status of ALTER TABLE Per-Olof Pettersson
• 13:17   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 13:30   Re: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 13:32   Re: UNDER? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:33   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
• 13:41   AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AI X Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:48   Re: UNDER? Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 14:08   AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:47   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 14:50   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 15:20   RE: Lock on arbitrary string feature Mikheev, Vadim
• 15:25   Re: drop table and pg_proc Tom Lane
• 15:33   Re: Lock on arbitrary string feature Adam Haberlach
• 15:36   RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:06   Java Classes excalibur@hub.org
• 16:26   Re: Lock on arbitrary string feature Tom Lane
• 16:30   RE: Lock on arbitrary string feature Myron Scott
• 17:08   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
• 17:16   RE: drop table and pg_proc Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:18   RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 17:22   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 18:25   Re: Lock on arbitrary string feature Jan Wieck
• 18:31   Overprotectiveness in DefineQueryRewrite? Tom Lane
• 18:36   Re: Install Failure [7.1beta2 tarballs] Tom Lane
• 18:38   postgresql.conf and postgres options Oliver Elphick
• 18:44   RE: postgresql.conf and postgres options Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:03   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 19:15   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 20:37   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
• 20:42   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
• 20:42   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Lamar Owen
• 20:48   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... Peter Eisentraut
• 20:52   Re: Install Failure [7.1beta2 tarballs] Peter Eisentraut
• 20:56   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... The Hermit Hacker
• 21:08   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 21:13   Re: postgresql.conf and postgres options Peter Eisentraut
• 21:18   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... Peter Eisentraut
• 21:26   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... The Hermit Hacker
• 21:33   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
• 21:43   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 21:55   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 21:57   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 22:04   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... Peter Eisentraut
• 22:07   RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
• 22:28   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... Tom Lane
• 22:32   RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 22:51   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 23:26   RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:32   Re: A post-7.1 wish-list. XuYifeng
• 23:43   RE: Lock on arbitrary string feature Lincoln Yeoh

12 January 2001

• 00:37   Re: Lock on arbitrary string feature Lincoln Yeoh
• 00:47   alter table drop column Jeff Davis
• 00:56   CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) Tom Lane
• 01:00   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Lamar Owen
• 01:08   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 01:09   Re: Lock on arbitrary string feature Lincoln Yeoh
• 01:20   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Lamar Owen
• 01:33   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
• 01:55   Pg7.1beta3: FATAL: s_lock(0x401f7010) at spin.c:147, stuck spinlock. Valter Mazzola
• 02:21   Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. Lamar Owen
• 02:22   Re: Pg7.1beta3: FATAL: s_lock(0x401f7010) at spin.c:147, stuck spinlock. Tom Lane
• 02:24   Re: [GENERAL] Java Classes Joseph Shraibman
• 02:26   Re: Pg7.1beta3: FATAL: s_lock(0x401f7010) at spin.c:147, stuck spinlock. Valter Mazzola
• 03:13   Re: drop table and pg_proc Bruce Momjian
• 03:25   Re: postgresql.conf and postgres options Bruce Momjian
• 03:38   Re: alter table drop column Bruce Momjian
• 03:40   Re: CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) Bruce Momjian
• 03:44   Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. Bruce Momjian
• 03:54   Pg7.1beta3: connect failed: The DB System is starting up. Valter Mazzola
• 04:16   Re: CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) Tom Lane
• 04:20   Re: CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) Philip Warner
• 04:59   Re: CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) Vadim Mikheev
• 05:30   Re: CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) Vadim Mikheev
• 06:28   Re: Pg7.1beta3: connect failed: The DB System is starting up. Vadim Mikheev
• 06:40   AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 06:48   Re: Pg7.1beta3: connect failed: The DB System is starting up. Valter Mazzola
• 07:04   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Pete Forman
• 07:22   RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 07:29   AW: CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:34   RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 10:40   pgaccess: russian fonts && SQL window??? tolik@aaanet.ru (Anatoly K. Lasareff)
• 11:03   Re: Suggested fix for pg_dump Philip Warner
• 11:14   Re: Suggested fix for pg_dump Philip Warner
• 11:15   RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
• 11:25   Re: Pg7.1beta3: connect failed: The DB System is starting up. The Hermit Hacker
• 12:00   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
• 12:03   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
• 12:33   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
• 12:52   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 13:03   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 13:08   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Thomas Lockhart
• 13:17   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
• 13:19   Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! ) The Hermit Hacker
• 13:21   Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. Lamar Owen
• 13:23   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
• 13:27   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 13:30   Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! ) Tom Lane
• 13:38   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Pete Forman
• 13:48   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Tom Lane
• 13:52   AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:53   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 13:56   Re: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. Keith G. Murphy
• 14:07   Re: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Peter Eisentraut
• 14:08   AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:15   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... Peter Eisentraut
• 14:15   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Michael J Schout
• 14:21   Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. Bruce Momjian
• 14:23   RPMs (was Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?) Peter Eisentraut
• 14:24   Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ... Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Thomas Lockhart
• 14:30   Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. Vince Vielhaber
• 14:39   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Bruce Momjian
• 14:47   Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! ) Bruce Momjian
• 14:49   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? bpalmer
• 14:54   Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. Vince Vielhaber
• 14:58   Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
• 15:00   Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! ) The Hermit Hacker
• 15:05   Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases Frank Joerdens
• 15:11   Re: FWD: bizarre behavior of 'time' data entry Thomas Lockhart
• 15:13   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Pete Forman
• 15:13   Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. The Hermit Hacker
• 15:32   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 15:36   Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Tom Lane
• 15:48   Re: Beta2 ... ? Thomas Lockhart
• 16:35   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Oliver Elphick
• 16:54   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 17:03   Re: Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases Frank Joerdens
• 17:13   Re: Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases Frank Joerdens
• 17:20   RE: Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled datab ases Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:35   Re: Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases Tom Lane
• 17:37   Re: Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases Tom Lane
• 17:43   RE: Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled datab ases Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:45   Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 17:47   Re: Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases Frank Joerdens
• 17:53   RE: Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled datab ases Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:03   Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. Lamar Owen
• 18:06   Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. Bruce Momjian
• 18:08   Re: RPMs (was Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?) Lamar Owen
• 18:18   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
• 18:19   Re: Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases Tom Lane
• 18:25   RE: Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled datab ases Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:27   Re: RPMs (was Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?) Lamar Owen
• 18:35   CRCs ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 18:37   Re: still no log Martin A. Marques
• 18:51   problems with pg_geqo Martin A. Marques
• 19:09   RE: CRCs Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:49   Re: CRCs ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:58   CVS updates on committers list... Larry Rosenman
• 20:01   Re: CRCs ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:01   SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Tom Lane
• 20:04   Re: CVS updates on committers list... Bruce Momjian
• 20:06   RE: CVS updates on committers list... Larry Rosenman
• 20:13   RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:13   Re: CVS updates on committers list... Bruce Momjian
• 20:16   RE: CRCs Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:16   Re: problems with pg_geqo Tom Lane
• 20:39   Re: CVS updates on committers list... Tom Lane
• 20:54   Re: CRCs ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:09   Re: CVS updates on committers list... Ian Lance Taylor
• 21:09   Re: CRCs Tom Lane
• 21:15   RE: CRCs Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:48   Re: CRCs ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:59   RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:01   Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Tom Lane
• 22:04   Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Tom Lane
• 22:21   Re: CRCs Alfred Perlstein
• 22:39   RE: CRCs Mikheev, Vadim
• 22:44   Re: CVS updates on committers list... The Hermit Hacker
• 22:48   Re: CRCs Tom Lane
• 22:50   Re: CRCs ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:58   Re: CVS updates on committers list... The Hermit Hacker
• 22:58   RE: CRCs Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:42   Re: CRCs Daniele Orlandi

13 January 2001

• 00:17   Re: CVS updates on committers list... Peter Eisentraut
• 00:28   Re: CVS updates on committers list... Ian Lance Taylor
• 00:52   Re: CVS updates on committers list... Peter Eisentraut
• 01:06   Re: RPMs (was Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?) Peter Eisentraut
• 01:16   Re: CVS updates on committers list... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:23   Re: CVS updates on committers list... Ian Lance Taylor
• 02:30   Re: CRCs Tom Lane
• 04:39   Re: pgaccess: russian fonts && SQL window??? Tom Lane
• 07:18   Out of town these long weekends... Vadim Mikheev
• 07:36   Re: CRCs ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 08:47   Re: CRCs ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 09:48   (forw) Re: CVS Commit message generator... Larry Rosenman
• 13:32   Re: FWD: bizarre behavior of 'time' data entry Thomas Lockhart
• 13:43   Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:59   Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. Thomas Lockhart
• 14:03   Re: RPMs (was Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?) Thomas Lockhart
• 15:19   Re: FWD: bizarre behavior of 'time' data entry Thomas Lockhart
• 15:35   Re: pgaccess: russian fonts && SQL window??? Tom Lane
• 15:49   Re: CRCs Tom Lane
• 18:08   diffs available? Konstantinos Agouros
• 20:28   Bug in datetime formatting for very large years Oliver Elphick
• 20:31   Re: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov
• 21:08   primary keys Felipe Diaz Cardona
• 21:34   Re: CRCs ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:37   Re: CRCs Horst Herb
• 23:18   Transactions vs speed. mlw

14 January 2001

• 00:37   Re: RPMs (was Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?) Lamar Owen
• 01:14   Re: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 01:21   Re: Transactions vs speed. Alfred Perlstein
• 01:37   Re: Transactions vs speed. mlw
• 01:50   Re: Transactions vs speed. Alfred Perlstein
• 02:12   Re: Transactions vs speed. Tom Lane
• 02:20   Re: CRCs Tom Lane
• 04:12   RPMS for 7.1beta3 in progress. Lamar Owen
• 11:00   RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:42   R-Tree implementation using GiST Oleg Bartunov
• 17:00   MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly) Tom Lane
• 17:08   RE: MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly) Mike Mascari
• 17:56   Re: MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly) Tom Lane
• 22:15   conflicting types for `struct Oid' Corrado Giacomini
• 22:24   Must implement PQnotifyFree() Steve Howe
• 22:40   Re: FWD: bizarre behavior of 'time' data entry Barry Stewart
• 22:42   Re: pgaccess: russian fonts && SQL window??? Len Morgan
• 22:50   Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Tom Lane
• 22:54   RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:54   Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Tom Lane
• 22:55   Re: FWD: bizarre behavior of 'time' data entry Barry Stewart
• 22:59   SUCCESS!!: bizarre behavior of 'time' data entry Barry Stewart
• 23:05   copy from stdin; bug? Rehak Tamas
• 23:09   Re: Must implement PQnotifyFree() Tom Lane
• 23:31   Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:41   Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Tom Lane
• 23:48   RE: primary keys Christopher Kings-Lynne

15 January 2001

• 00:29   Re: copy from stdin; bug? Tom Lane
• 00:56   Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:30   Re: copy from stdin; bug? Rehak Tamas
• 01:54   Re: copy from stdin; bug? Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:44   Re: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov
• 04:00   Re: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
• 05:20   RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Lamar Owen
• 07:32   AW: CRCs Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:31   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Oliver Elphick
• 10:58   Re: PostgreSQL 7.0.2 with thai locale. Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:04   subselect bug? Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:06   Re: subselect bug? Tom Lane
• 13:42   locale and multibyte together in 7.1 tolik@aaanet.ru (Anatoly K. Lasareff)
• 15:43   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Peter Eisentraut
• 18:38   Re: subselect bug? Tom Lane
• 18:50   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Lamar Owen
• 19:00   $PGDATA/base/??? bpalmer
• 19:03   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 19:04   Re: $PGDATA/base/??? Lamar Owen
• 19:08   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Lamar Owen
• 19:12   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Tom Lane
• 19:26   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Lamar Owen
• 19:29   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Tom Lane
• 19:30   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Lamar Owen
• 19:55   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Peter Eisentraut
• 19:56   Re: $PGDATA/base/??? Bruce Momjian
• 20:05   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 20:09   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Peter Eisentraut
• 20:11   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Peter Eisentraut
• 20:15   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Lamar Owen
• 20:16   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Lamar Owen
• 20:17   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 20:26   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 20:48   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Lamar Owen
• 20:49   Why is LockClassinfoForUpdate()'s mark4update a good idea? Tom Lane
• 21:45   Re: CRCs ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:50   Re: Why is LockClassinfoForUpdate()'s mark4update a good idea? Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:04   Re: copy from stdin; bug? Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:14   Re: Why is LockClassinfoForUpdate()'s mark4update a good idea? Tom Lane

16 January 2001

• 00:19   Re: Why is LockClassinfoForUpdate()'s mark4update a good idea? Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:32   Re: Why is LockClassinfoForUpdate()'s mark4update a good idea? Tom Lane
• 00:35   Re: subselect bug? Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:50   7.1beta3-2 RPMset uploading. Lamar Owen
• 01:12   Re: Why is LockClassinfoForUpdate()'s mark4update a good idea? Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:53   Re: MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly) Thomas Lockhart
• 06:07   Re: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov
• 12:24   Re: PostgreSQL 7.0.2 with locale. Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:35   Re: MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly) Emmanuel Charpentier
• 12:35   ODBC Driver int8 Patch Dave Page
• 12:36   Re: copy from stdin; bug? Rehak Tamas
• 12:37   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Karl DeBisschop
• 12:38   who can design or recomend Database Momo Mordacz
• 12:38   Does PostgreSQL support Dynamic SQL? Lark
• 12:40   View tables relationship riccardo
• 12:40   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Karl DeBisschop
• 14:29   Re: locale and multibyte together in 7.1 tolik@aaanet.ru (Anatoly K. Lasareff)
• 14:40   Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Peter Eisentraut
• 14:50   Re: ODBC Driver int8 Patch Bruce Momjian
• 15:29   RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:26   Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs 6.5.3 bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri)
• 16:30   Re: View tables relationship Gilles DAROLD
• 16:41   CASE inet << inet ... The Hermit Hacker
• 17:01   Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs 6.5.3 Tom Lane
• 17:04   Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs 6.5.3 mlw
• 17:36   RE: CRCs Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:36   Perl5 confusions Helge Haugland
• 18:51   RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:21   Re: [GENERAL] Re: INIT DB FAILURE Tom Lane
• 19:27   RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:27   DeadLockCheck is buggy Tom Lane
• 20:28   Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Tom Lane
• 21:49   renaming indices? Alex Pilosov
• 22:07   Re: renaming indices? Tom Lane
• 22:09   Re: CASE inet << inet ... Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: DeadLockCheck is buggy Bruce Momjian
• 23:24   Re: CASE inet << inet ... The Hermit Hacker
• 23:29   Boolean and Bit Keith Gray
• 23:47   Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs 6.5.3 bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri)

17 January 2001

• 00:54   Slashdot and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 01:09   Re: [GENERAL] Slashdot and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 03:08   Re: Boolean and Bit Thomas Lockhart
• 05:54   Re: [GENERAL] Slashdot and PostgreSQL Alessio Bragadini
• 06:59   AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:10   AW: Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs 6.5.3 Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:22   AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:24   AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:45   SIGNATURE for int sets (need advise) Oleg Bartunov
• 12:06   Re: renaming indices? Hannu Krosing
• 12:58   Mysterious 7.0.3 error Camm Maguire
• 12:59   Re: AW: Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs 6.5.3 Tom Lane
• 13:13   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 13:19   Re: Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs 6.5.3 Hannu Krosing
• 13:29   Re: Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri)
• 13:44   Re: Mysterious 7.0.3 error Tom Lane
• 14:01   AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AI X Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:16   Re: Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs Hannu Krosing
• 15:43   Re: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 15:52   Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AI X Peter Eisentraut
• 15:53   RE: ODBC Driver int8 Patch Dave Page
• 16:03   Re: Re: INIT DB FAILURE Mike Miller
• 16:10   Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Tom Lane
• 16:26   Re: copy from stdin; bug? Rehak Tamas
• 16:50   RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:51   Re: Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri)
• 16:59   Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Tom Lane
• 17:03   RE: DeadLockCheck is buggy Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:05   Re: [GENERAL] Slashdot and PostgreSQL Hunter Hillegas
• 17:07   Storing a binary file with Visual Basic and ADO Haritz Elosegi
• 17:12   Re: Mysterious 7.0.3 error Camm Maguire
• 17:50   Re: copy from stdin; bug? ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 18:13   Re: Re: Performance degradation in PostgreSQL 7.1beta3 vs Hannu Krosing
• 19:33   Cursors in PL/pgSQL Ian Lance Taylor
• 19:42   Re: [GENERAL] Slashdot and PostgreSQL Robert B. Easter
• 20:49   Re: $PGDATA/base/??? Bruce Momjian
• 21:28   Re: $PGDATA/base/??? Ross J. Reedstrom
• 21:55   Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea Thomas Swan
• 21:57   Re: $PGDATA/base/??? bpalmer
• 23:02   Getting configure to notice link-time vs run-time failures Tom Lane
• 23:30   Re: copy from stdin; bug? Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:44   Re: $PGDATA/base/??? Tom Lane

18 January 2001

• 02:57   Nothing larger then int8? The Hermit Hacker
• 03:04   Re: Nothing larger then int8? The Hermit Hacker
• 03:08   Re: Nothing larger then int8? Tom Lane
• 03:10   Re: Nothing larger then int8? Lamar Owen
• 03:19   Re: Nothing larger then int8? The Hermit Hacker
• 03:38   Re: Nothing larger then int8? Alex Pilosov
• 04:35   Datetime regression tests are all failing Tom Lane
• 04:58   Re: Datetime regression tests are all failing Thomas Lockhart
• 05:28   GET DIAGNOSTICS SELECT PROCESSED INTO  Dan Langille
• 05:43   Re: Datetime regression tests are all failing Thomas Lockhart
• 06:49   AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems o n AI X Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:49   getCrossReference Felipe Diaz Cardona
• 09:26   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Pete Forman
• 10:14   What's with update, 7.0.2? mlw
• 11:00   compiling 7.1-beta1 Martin A. Marques
• 12:29   palloc? (re: What's with update?) mlw
• 12:39   Changes to include files Michael Meskes
• 12:47   converting from text -> inet ... possible? The Hermit Hacker
• 13:07   Re: converting from text -> inet ... possible? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:17   compilation error Martin A. Marques
• 13:20   Re: Changes to include files Thomas Lockhart
• 13:23   Re: converting from text -> inet ... possible? The Hermit Hacker
• 13:26   AW: compilation error Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:53   Re: copy from stdin; bug? Emmanuel Charpentier
• 15:56   Re: copy from stdin; bug? Oliver Elphick
• 16:09   Re: converting from text -> inet ... possible? Hannu Krosing
• 16:14   Gateway wenjin.zheng
• 16:22   Re: Changes to include files Bruce Momjian
• 16:31   Re: copy from stdin; bug? Oliver Elphick
• 16:31   Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS SELECT PROCESSED INTO  Bruce Momjian
• 16:33   Re: converting from text -> inet ... possible? Bruce Momjian
• 16:54   Re: compiling 7.1-beta1 Tom Lane
• 16:56   Re: Gateway Bruce Momjian
• 16:58   Re: Re: Changes to include files Bruce Momjian
• 17:20   RE: compiling 7.1-beta1 Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:35   Re: palloc? (re: What's with update?) Tom Lane
• 17:42   A bug with unique indicies Aditya Damle
• 18:06   Re: Changes to include files Tom Lane
• 18:24   7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error robn@verdi.et.tudelft.nl (Rob van Nieuwkerk)
• 18:31   test/locale broken Patrick Welche
• 18:33   OLD.oid issues... Rod Taylor
• 18:39   Re: Autoconf version discrepancies Patrick Welche
• 18:44   charset.htm Patrick Welche
• 19:00   Re: OLD.oid issues... Stephan Szabo
• 19:21   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error Tom Lane
• 19:54   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error Rob van Nieuwkerk
• 20:02   Re: A bug with unique indicies Tom Lane
• 20:09   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error mlw
• 20:34   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error Tom Lane
• 20:37   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error Rob van Nieuwkerk
• 20:47   Re: copy from stdin; bug? ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:17   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error Rob van Nieuwkerk
• 21:40   Re: Getting configure to notice link-time vs run-time failures Peter Eisentraut
• 21:40   Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems o n AI X Peter Eisentraut
• 21:41   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 22:02   Re: [NOVICE] Re: Interval output format Oliver Elphick
• 23:20   Deadlock reimplementation notes (kinda long) Tom Lane
• 23:53   Re: converting from text -> inet ... possible? Thomas Lockhart
• 23:57   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error Tom Lane

19 January 2001

• 00:06   Re: converting from text -> inet ... possible? Bruce Momjian
• 00:15   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error Barry Lind
• 00:31   Re: Program test strcoll(). Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:39   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error Tom Lane
• 00:54   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error Bruce Momjian
• 00:58   s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 01:17   Re: charset.htm Tom Lane
• 01:49   Re: s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
• 01:58   Re: s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 02:07   FW: User management Patrick Dunford
• 02:07   Re: Re: postgres TODO Bruce Momjian
• 02:18   PlPerl.c patch Travis Bauer
• 02:40   Re: PlPerl.c patch Tom Lane
• 02:55   Standards URL's Bruce Momjian
• 03:14   Re: Standards URL's Tom Lane
• 03:23   Re: Standards URL's Bruce Momjian
• 03:38   Re: Standards URL's Tom Lane
• 05:08   Re: 7.1beta3-2 RPMset uploading. Tom Lane
• 06:15   AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator proble ms o n AI X Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 06:49   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error Hannu Krosing
• 06:53   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error Hannu Krosing
• 07:09   Re: Standards URL's Hannu Krosing
• 07:27   Re: Changes to include files Michael Meskes
• 09:08   Re: PlPerl.c patch Travis Bauer
• 10:34   SegFault in 7.0.3 libpq.so.2.1 Heinz Ekker
• 10:46   Re: compiling 7.1-beta1 Martin A. Marques
• 11:03   Problems with BLOBs under Windows? Trond Kjernaasen
• 12:20   Re: install locale. Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:28   select within a fucntion Sinuhé Arroyo
• 13:18   Re: Re: Getting configure to notice link-time vs run-time failures Tom Lane
• 13:37   Re: Re: Changes to include files Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: SegFault in 7.0.3 libpq.so.2.1 Tom Lane
• 14:10   Re: Re: Changes to include files Michael Meskes
• 14:18   Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Peter Eisentraut
• 14:22   Re: PlPerl.c patch Bruce Momjian
• 14:28   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Peter Eisentraut
• 14:29   Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator proble ms o n AI X Peter Eisentraut
• 14:29   AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AI X Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:30   Re: 7.1beta3-2 RPMset uploading. Lamar Owen
• 14:39   AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator pr oble ms o n AIX Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:44   Re: Problems with BLOBs under Windows? Trond Kjernaasen
• 14:53   Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 15:03   Re: Re: Getting configure to notice link-time vs run-time failures Patrick Welche
• 15:07   Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacement policy Bruce Momjian
• 15:45   Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacement policy Tom Lane
• 15:46   RPMset 7.1beta3-2 partially broken. Lamar Owen
• 16:00   Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacement policy Bruce Momjian
• 16:03   Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacement policy Bruce Momjian
• 16:04   Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacement policy Bruce Momjian
• 16:07   RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:25   Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
• 16:37   Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 16:49   Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 16:51   Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 17:02   Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Tom Lane
• 17:03   Re: Re: Problems with BLOBs under Windows? Tom Lane
• 17:14   RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:30   Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Larry Rosenman
• 17:39   Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacement policy Patrick Welche
• 18:06   Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Ian Lance Taylor
• 18:18   Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy Bruce Momjian
• 18:19   Re: test/locale broken Peter Eisentraut
• 18:26   re-instalation Martin A. Marques
• 18:36   Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Ian Lance Taylor
• 18:37   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 18:56   Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation Martin A. Marques
• 18:56   Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 18:58   Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator proble ms o n AIX Thomas Lockhart
• 19:43   Re: "initdb -t" destroys all databases Bruce Momjian
• 19:59   Re: Bit strings Bruce Momjian
• 20:10   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Peter Eisentraut
• 20:27   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Ian Lance Taylor
• 20:27   Re: Bit strings Peter Eisentraut
• 20:34   Re: Bit strings Tom Lane
• 20:42   Re: Bit strings Bruce Momjian
• 20:51   Re: Bit strings Peter Eisentraut
• 21:01   RE: A couple of fishy-looking critical sections Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:06   Re: A couple of fishy-looking critical sections Tom Lane
• 21:11   Re: Bit strings Tom Lane
• 21:17   Re: select within a fucntion Jan Wieck
• 21:17   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Peter Eisentraut
• 22:53   Re: "initdb -t" destroys all databases Tom Lane
• 23:14   Re: 7.0.3 reproduceable serious select error mlw

20 January 2001

• 00:41   Re: length coerce for bpchar is broken since 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 01:07   Rules and SELECT Bruce Momjian
• 01:45   Re: length coerce for bpchar is broken since 7.0 Tom Lane
• 01:45   Rule/SELECT Bruce Momjian
• 02:09   Re: length coerce for bpchar is broken since 7.0 Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:12   C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:43   Re: Re: BIT/BIT VARYING status Bruce Momjian
• 02:51   Re: Leaking definitions to user programs Bruce Momjian
• 03:00   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Bruce Momjian
• 03:40   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Ian Lance Taylor
• 06:18   Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? Tom Lane
• 06:29   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 13:41   status of 64bit ints? was: Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Marko Kreen
• 13:49   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Peter Eisentraut
• 13:51   Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:04   Re: status of 64bit ints? was: Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Tom Lane
• 14:37   Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? Tom Lane
• 16:07   Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? Peter Eisentraut
• 16:08   Re: "initdb -t" destroys all databases Peter Eisentraut
• 16:31   Re: [PATCHES] binary operators on integers Tom Lane
• 16:31   Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? Tom Lane
• 16:54   Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? Peter Eisentraut
• 17:19   Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? Tom Lane
• 17:32   Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation Martin A. Marques
• 19:10   Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation Tom Lane
• 19:31   Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? Marko Kreen
• 19:36   Re: Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation Peter Eisentraut
• 20:01   Re: Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation Martin A. Marques
• 20:07   beta3 vacuum crash Frank Joerdens
• 20:35   Re: beta3 vacuum crash Tom Lane
• 20:55   like and optimization Juriy Goloveshkin
• 21:27   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Ian Lance Taylor
• 22:23   Re: like and optimization Tom Lane
• 23:07   Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? Tom Lane
• 23:29   Re: like and optimization robn@verdi.et.tudelft.nl (Rob van Nieuwkerk)
• 23:57   Re: drop table and pg_proc Tatsuo Ishii

21 January 2001

• 00:53   Re: like and optimization Tom Lane
• 01:51   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch to support transactions with BLOBs for current CVS Bruce Momjian
• 01:58   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch to support transactions with BLOBs for current CVS Bruce Momjian
• 02:40   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch to support transactions with BLOBs for current CVS Tom Lane
• 04:46   Re: BIT/BIT VARYING status Adriaan Joubert
• 04:50   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch to support transactions with BLOBs for current CVS Denis Perchine
• 05:15   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch to support transactions with BLOBs for current CVS Tom Lane
• 05:43   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch to support transactions with BLOBs for current CVS Denis Perchine
• 11:58   Re: BIT/BIT VARYING status Bruce Momjian
• 15:46   Re: beta3 vacuum crash Frank Joerdens
• 16:35   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch to support transactions with BLOBs for current CVS Tom Lane
• 16:54   Tangent ... For those that like stats ... The Hermit Hacker
• 16:59   Re: [PATCHES] binary operators on integers Marko Kreen
• 20:16   update to contrib/pgcrypto Marko Kreen

22 January 2001

• 06:30   Re: Need a debugging tip or two Bruce Momjian
• 06:45   FW: Postgresql on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 09:17   AW: like and optimization Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:17   Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX Pete Forman
• 09:23   AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AI X Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:31   AW: FW: Postgresql on win32 Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:37   timestamp (mis)behaviors Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:47   Strange initdb error with kernel 2.4: unknown type 'ame'. Robert Schrem
• 11:02   Re: [PATCHES] Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transactionis still open The Hermit Hacker
• 13:18   Re: AW: like and optimization Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 13:33   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Tom Lane
• 13:40   Re: timestamp (mis)behaviors Thomas Lockhart
• 13:44   Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Marko Kreen
• 13:47   Re: AW: FW: Postgresql on win32 Tom Lane
• 13:49   RE: AW: FW: Postgresql on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 13:59   RE: FW: Postgresql on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 14:01   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Tom Lane
• 14:01   AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:10   Re: AW: like and optimization Peter Eisentraut
• 14:12   Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Peter Eisentraut
• 14:19   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Pete Forman
• 14:27   Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Tom Lane
• 14:29   AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:35   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 14:57   Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Thomas Lockhart
• 15:03   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Peter Eisentraut
• 15:07   Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Peter Eisentraut
• 15:09   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Tom Lane
• 15:17   Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AI X Peter Eisentraut
• 15:19   Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Joel Burton
• 15:33   Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:36   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Peter Eisentraut
• 15:40   Beta 3 question(s) Mitch Vincent
• 15:41   Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Joel Burton
• 15:55   Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:14   RE: Beta 3 question(s) Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:19   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Tom Lane
• 17:53   Generating History Rod Taylor
• 18:33   A couple of fishy-looking critical sections Tom Lane
• 19:03   Re: [GENERAL] postgres memory management Peter Mount
• 19:30   Re: Re: [GENERAL] postgres memory management Alfred Perlstein
• 19:44   AW: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 20:04   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Bruce Momjian
• 20:05   Re: AW: like and optimization Hannu Krosing
• 20:14   Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Hannu Krosing
• 20:30   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Peter Mount
• 20:46   Re: AW: like and optimization Tom Lane
• 21:09   Re: AW: like and optimization ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:22   realloc suggestion Karel Zak
• 21:33   Re: drop table and pg_proc Tom Lane
• 23:06   Re: realloc suggestion Tom Lane
• 23:14   Re: AW: AW: Could turn on -O2 in AIX Bruce Momjian
• 23:19   Re: AW: AW: Could turn on -O2 in AIX Tom Lane
• 23:48   Re: int4 or int32 Bruce Momjian
• 23:55   Re: AW: like and optimization Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:56   Re: Generating History Tom Lane

23 January 2001

• 00:00   Re: int4 or int32 Tom Lane
• 00:24   Re: int4 or int32 Bruce Momjian
• 00:27   Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c) Bruce Momjian
• 00:33   Re: Problem in AlterTableAddConstraint? Bruce Momjian
• 00:57   Re: Problem in AlterTableAddConstraint? Tom Lane
• 01:07   Re: Problem in AlterTableAddConstraint? Stephan Szabo
• 01:31   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Fred Yankowski
• 01:47   Re: COPY BINARY is broken... Bruce Momjian
• 01:55   Re: Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x Bruce Momjian
• 02:02   Re: Unknown-type resolution rules, redux Bruce Momjian
• 02:06   Re: SourceForge & Postgres Bruce Momjian
• 02:17   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Bruce Momjian
• 02:17   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Bruce Momjian
• 02:20   Re: COPY BINARY is broken... Tom Lane
• 02:21   Re: Unknown-type resolution rules, redux Tom Lane
• 02:36   Re: Unknown-type resolution rules, redux Bruce Momjian
• 02:47   Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Bruce Momjian
• 02:51   Re: PL/Python (was: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Trigger) Bruce Momjian
• 02:53   Re: Inline Comments for pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 03:06   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 04:02   Newbe hacker, interface question on includes... Otto A. Hirr, Jr.
• 04:56   Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation Len Morgan
• 04:57   Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation Brett W. McCoy
• 05:40   Re: test/locale broken Patrick Welche
• 05:42   Re: Newbe hacker, interface question on includes... Thomas Lockhart
• 05:49   Postgresql on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 05:57   question Cameron Laird
• 06:38   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Max Khon
• 06:52   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Peter T Mount
• 07:19   AW: int4 or int32 Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:19   Re: question Robert B. Easter
• 07:30   Re: PostgreSQL v6.5.3 Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:00   Re: postgres memory management Pete Forman
• 12:33   Re: AW: int4 or int32 Bruce Momjian
• 12:51   Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 13:50   Re: PL/Python (was: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Trigger) Karel Zak
• 14:00   Re: realloc suggestion Karel Zak
• 14:19   Re: question Tom Lane
• 14:28   Does Oracle store values in indices? Denis Perchine
• 14:55   Re: question Ned Lilly
• 15:01   Re: [GENERAL] MySQL -> Postgres dump converter Bruce Momjian
• 15:10   Re: question Lamar Owen
• 15:22   WAL documentation Oliver Elphick
• 15:30   GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) Lamar Owen
• 15:56   Re: Does Oracle store values in indices? Tom Lane
• 16:04   Re: [GENERAL] MySQL -> Postgres dump converter Thomas Lockhart
• 16:05   Re: Does Oracle store values in indices? Denis Perchine
• 16:11   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Adam Haberlach
• 16:27   RE: Does Oracle store values in indices? Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:37   Re: Does Oracle store values in indices? Denis Perchine
• 16:47   Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) Poul Laust Christiansen
• 16:51   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Stephan Szabo
• 16:57   Re: [GENERAL] MySQL -> Postgres dump converter Max Rudensky
• 17:02   Re: Does Oracle store values in indices? Bruce Momjian
• 17:14   Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) Thomas Lockhart
• 17:23   Re: Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x Alfred Perlstein
• 17:38   Re: Does Oracle store values in indices? Alfred Perlstein
• 17:44   Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) Peter Eisentraut
• 17:46   Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) dom@idealx.com
• 17:47   Re: Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x G. Anthony Reina
• 18:15   pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute Peter Eisentraut
• 18:32   Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute Bruce Momjian
• 18:48   Re: "initdb -t" destroys all databases Peter Eisentraut
• 19:08   Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) Roderick A. Anderson
• 19:14   RE: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:16   LEFT JOIN in pg_dumpall is a bug Peter Eisentraut
• 19:17   Re: "initdb -t" destroys all databases Tom Lane
• 19:54   Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 19:55   Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) Lamar Owen
• 20:01   Re: LEFT JOIN in pg_dumpall is a bug Tom Lane
• 20:08   Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute Tom Lane
• 20:36   RE: Does Oracle store values in indices? Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:01   Re: [PATCHES] binary operators on integers Tom Lane
• 21:01   Re: Does Oracle store values in indices? Tom Lane

24 January 2001

• 00:14   Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute Alex Pilosov
• 01:39   Re: $PGDATA/base/??? Bruce Momjian
• 01:46   Re: R-Tree implementation using GiST Bruce Momjian
• 01:57   Re: Postgresql on win32 Bruce Momjian
• 01:59   Re: [PATCHES] Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transactionis still open Bruce Momjian
• 02:03   Re: [PATCHES] update to contrib/pgcrypto Bruce Momjian
• 02:17   Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation Brett W. McCoy
• 02:19   beta3 vacuum crash Frank Joerdens
• 02:30   This script will crash the connection Steve Howe
• 02:31   Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? Patrick Welche
• 02:34   Strange error in PHP/Postgre on RadHat? Dmitri E. Gurevich
• 02:40   Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation Brett W. McCoy
• 02:47   Strange.. Patrick Welche
• 02:47   Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Emmanuel Charpentier
• 02:49   beta4 ... almost time to wrap one ... The Hermit Hacker
• 02:50   Re: WAL documentation Barry Lind
• 02:55   Strange.. solved Patrick Welche
• 03:01   Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute Tom Lane
• 03:04   Re: $PGDATA/base/??? Bruce Momjian
• 03:04   Re: $PGDATA/base/??? bpalmer
• 03:05   Re: [PATCHES] Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transactionis still open Tom Lane
• 03:05   Re: [PATCHES] Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transactionis still open Christof Petig
• 03:16   Re: beta4 ... almost time to wrap one ... Tom Lane
• 03:22   Re: [PATCHES] Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transactionis still open Bruce Momjian
• 03:24   Re: This script will crash the connection Tom Lane
• 03:27   Re: $PGDATA/base/??? Bruce Momjian
• 03:30   Re: beta4 ... almost time to wrap one ... Bruce Momjian
• 03:37   Re: [GENERAL] postgres memory management Alexander Jerusalem
• 03:44   Re: beta4 ... almost time to wrap one ... Bruce Momjian
• 03:47   Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 03:57   Re: beta4 ... almost time to wrap one ... The Hermit Hacker
• 04:04   Re: Re: postgres memory management Alexander Jerusalem
• 04:05   Re: postgres memory management Justin Clift
• 04:09   Re: This script will crash the connection Tom Lane
• 04:24   RE: WAL documentation Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:22   AW: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:28   Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Hannu Krosing
• 10:01   Re: 2-phase commit dom@idealx.com
• 10:09   Re: This script will crash the connection Bruce Momjian
• 10:10   Re: WAL documentation Bruce Momjian
• 10:55   Re: "initdb -t" destroys all databases Bruce Momjian
• 11:13   Re: Open 7.1 items The Hermit Hacker
• 11:20   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 12:11   Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) Travis Bauer
• 12:14   Re: PostgreSQL on WinME? Manuel Cabido
• 12:30   Re: select within a fucntion Sinuhé Arroyo Gómez
• 12:51   Re: AW: like and optimization Patrick Welche
• 13:11   Re: AW: like and optimization Patrick Welche
• 13:38   Re: PgAccess - small bug? Bruce Momjian
• 13:38   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Tom Lane
• 13:39   RE: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH] Magnus Hagander
• 13:42   BETWEEN patch Thomas Swan
• 13:52   Libpq async issues Bruce Momjian
• 13:53   Re: Inline Comments for pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 13:59   Re: WAL fsync scheduling Bruce Momjian
• 14:00   Re: AW: Postgresql on win32 Bruce Momjian
• 14:29   Re: Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x Bruce Momjian
• 14:35   Re: [GENERAL] rules on INSERT can't UPDATE new instance? Bruce Momjian
• 14:36   function optimization ??? Brent Verner
• 14:37   Re: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH] Bruce Momjian
• 14:38   [JOB] pqsql hacker needed M Carling
• 14:50   Re: [GENERAL] User names Bruce Momjian
• 14:50   Re: Minor buglet in update...from (I think) Bruce Momjian
• 14:51   Re: [GENERAL] child table doesn't inherit PRIMARY KEY? Bruce Momjian
• 15:05   Re: [PATCHES] PgAccess schema-diagram cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 15:12   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Bruce Momjian
• 15:13   Re: [PATCHES] Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transactionis still open Peter Eisentraut
• 15:14   Re: unixODBC again :-( Bruce Momjian
• 15:16   Re: [BUGS] select cash_out('2'); crashes backend on 7.0.2 Bruce Momjian
• 15:19   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 15:20   Re: Open 7.1 items Hannu Krosing
• 15:20   Re: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH] Bruce Momjian
• 15:22   Re: This script will crash the connection Tom Lane
• 15:24   Cleanup time Bruce Momjian
• 15:35   RE: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH] Magnus Hagander
• 15:36   AW: Postgresql on win32 Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:39   Re: Open 7.1 items Hannu Krosing
• 15:39   Re: Open 7.1 items The Hermit Hacker
• 15:42   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Bruce Momjian
• 15:44   Re: select within a fucntion Hannu Krosing
• 15:44   Re: Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x Denis Perchine
• 15:46   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 15:50   Re: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH] Bruce Momjian
• 15:51   Re: PgAccess - small bug? Bruce Momjian
• 15:51   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 15:57   Re: Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) Samy Elashmawy
• 16:00   RE: FW: Postgresql on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 16:18   Re: Libpq async issues Tom Lane
• 16:18   Re: BETWEEN patch Tom Lane
• 16:25   Re: Libpq async issues Alfred Perlstein
• 16:33   Re: [PATCHES] PgAccess schema-diagram cleanup Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:34   Re: function optimization ??? Tom Lane
• 16:35   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . The Hermit Hacker
• 16:37   Re: [GENERAL] MySQL -> Postgres dump converter Bruce Momjian
• 16:42   Re: [PATCHES] Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transactionis still open Bruce Momjian
• 17:00   Re: LEFT JOIN in pg_dumpall is a bug Peter Eisentraut
• 17:13   Re: Libpq async issues Alfred Perlstein
• 17:13   Re: Re: unixODBC again :-( Peter Eisentraut
• 17:17   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Lamar Owen
• 17:36   Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC gives pq_recvbuf: unexpected EOF on client connection Bruce Momjian
• 17:48   Re: postgresql.conf and postgres options Bruce Momjian
• 17:51   Re: LEFT JOIN in pg_dumpall is a bug Tom Lane
• 18:01   PHP - Postgres large object functions Ned Lilly
• 18:03   RE: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:11   Re: [GENERAL] child table doesn't inherit PRIMARY KEY? Bruce Momjian
• 18:16   RE: WAL documentation Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:16   Re: postgresql.conf and postgres options Bruce Momjian
• 18:21   Re: [GENERAL] child table doesn't inherit PRIMARY KEY? Stephan Szabo
• 18:28   Re: Strange.. solved Stephan Szabo
• 18:51   Re: Re: unixODBC again :-( Peter Eisentraut
• 18:54   Re: Open 7.1 items Hannu Krosing
• 18:56   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 18:58   RE: FW: Postgresql on win32 Peter Eisentraut
• 19:01   beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Frank Joerdens
• 19:07   Re: postgresql.conf and postgres options Lamar Owen
• 19:11   Re: Open 7.1 items Hannu Krosing
• 19:25   RE: WAL documentation Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:28   Re: LEFT JOIN in pg_dumpall is a bug Peter Eisentraut
• 19:43   Re: Re: [GENERAL] child table doesn't inherit PRIMARY KEY? Oliver Elphick
• 19:55   Permissions on CHECKPOINT Peter Eisentraut
• 20:09   Re: postgresql.conf and postgres options Thomas Swan
• 20:15   Re: WAL documentation Oliver Elphick
• 20:22   Re: Permissions on CHECKPOINT Oliver Elphick
• 20:22   Re: Open 7.1 items The Hermit Hacker
• 20:42   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 20:45   Re: function optimization ??? Brent Verner
• 21:03   Re: LEFT JOIN in pg_dumpall is a bug Tom Lane
• 21:19   Re: WAL documentation Peter Eisentraut
• 21:21   Re: This script will crash the connection Jan Wieck
• 21:35   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Peter Eisentraut
• 21:47   Re: Re: unixODBC again :-( Bruce Momjian
• 21:56   Re: Re: [GENERAL] child table doesn't inherit PRIMARY KEY? Bruce Momjian
• 22:01   Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 Bruce Momjian
• 22:03   RE: Permissions on CHECKPOINT Mikheev, Vadim
• 22:07   Re: Re: postgresql.conf and postgres options Bruce Momjian
• 22:55   RE: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:33   Bad REFERENCES behaviour Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 23:50   Re: Bad REFERENCES behaviour Stephan Szabo

25 January 2001

• 01:33   7.1 question Bruce Momjian
• 01:46   Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 01:46   Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 01:53   TODO.deail Bruce Momjian
• 02:07   Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 05:34   Re: Open 7.1 items Oleg Bartunov
• 07:21   AW: [HACKERS] WAL documentation Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:06   Re: Open 7.1 items Peter T Mount
• 09:20   Re: Open 7.1 items Tom Lane
• 10:34   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Frank Joerdens
• 11:09   Re: PHP - Postgres large object functions Martin A. Marques
• 12:14   Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available . Denis Perchine
• 12:39   email address change Kovacs Zoltan
• 12:41   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] bpalmer
• 12:49   Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) dom@idealx.com
• 13:02   Re: Re: MySQL has transactions Mitch Vincent
• 14:04   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Peter Eisentraut
• 14:29   Re: Open 7.1 items Peter Eisentraut
• 14:32   new version of contrib-intarray Oleg Bartunov
• 14:42   RE: Permissions on CHECKPOINT Peter Eisentraut
• 16:22   Re: postgresql.conf and postgres options Peter Eisentraut
• 16:25   RPM: Contrib request. Lamar Owen
• 16:38   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Frank Joerdens
• 16:59   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Frank Joerdens
• 16:59   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Peter Eisentraut
• 17:33   Re: BETWEEN patch Thomas Swan
• 17:42   Re: RPM: Contrib request. Peter Eisentraut
• 17:55   pg_dump issues Rod Taylor
• 18:06   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Ian Lance Taylor
• 18:16   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Peter Eisentraut
• 18:17   Re: RPM: Contrib request. Randy Hall
• 18:46   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Frank Joerdens
• 18:52   "backend closed" --- I'd like to write a conversion function Kovacs Zoltan
• 19:20   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:26   Re: "backend closed" --- I'd like to write a conversion function Stephan Szabo
• 19:27   Talking about Solaris 7 Martin A. Marques
• 19:48   Re: SourceForge & Postgres Jan Wieck
• 20:24   Re: Open 7.1 items Tatsuo Ishii
• 20:47   Re: RPM: Contrib request. Oliver Elphick

26 January 2001

• 00:14   Re: RPM: Contrib request. Karel Zak
• 00:35   Re: RPM: Contrib request. Lamar Owen
• 01:08   Re: pg_dump issues Philip Warner
• 01:13   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Tom Lane
• 02:08   Re: Open 7.1 items Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:15   Re: BETWEEN patch Tom Lane
• 02:17   Re: Open 7.1 items Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:36   Re: RPM: Contrib request. Tom Lane
• 02:51   Re: RPM: Contrib request. Tom Lane
• 03:08   Re: Permissions on CHECKPOINT Tom Lane
• 03:12   Minor Sparc/Linux patch (regression test resultmap).... Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 03:30   PQprint KuroiNeko
• 03:41   Re: Permissions on CHECKPOINT Oliver Elphick
• 07:33   Re: [JDBC] Open 7.1 items Peter T Mount
• 09:27   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Pete Forman
• 13:00   Re: Open 7.1 items Peter Eisentraut
• 14:02   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report Frank Joerdens
• 14:16   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report Tom Lane
• 14:28   Hardwired MAXBACKENDS limit could be history Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:38   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report Frank Joerdens
• 15:00   RE: Permissions on CHECKPOINT Mikheev, Vadim
• 15:13   RE: Permissions on CHECKPOINT Mikheev, Vadim
• 15:25   Re: Open 7.1 items Jan Wieck
• 15:37   RE: Hardwired MAXBACKENDS limit could be history Mikheev, Vadim
• 15:47   Re: Hardwired MAXBACKENDS limit could be history Tom Lane
• 15:52   AW: Open 7.1 items Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 16:03   RE: Open 7.1 items Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:24   RE: Hardwired MAXBACKENDS limit could be history Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:33   Re: This script will crash the connection Tom Lane
• 16:54   Re: Open 7.1 items Tom Lane
• 16:56   postmaster -S will not print an error if pid file exists Peter Eisentraut
• 18:09   Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut
• 18:18   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
• 18:18   Re: Re: [JDBC] Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 18:24   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Ross J. Reedstrom
• 18:35   Re: This script will crash the connection Bruce Momjian
• 18:41   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Jan Wieck
• 18:48   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report Peter Eisentraut
• 18:49   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Alfred Perlstein
• 18:57   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 18:57   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut
• 18:58   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut
• 19:03   Re: postmaster -S will not print an error if pid file exists Tom Lane
• 19:07   Re: This script will crash the connection Tom Lane
• 19:08   Re: Open 7.1 items Tom Lane
• 19:10   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Bruce Momjian
• 19:24   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 19:30   Re: AW: Open 7.1 items Tom Lane
• 19:33   Re: Hardwired MAXBACKENDS limit could be history Tom Lane
• 19:48   Database tables disappeared. Stefan Klopp
• 19:49   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 19:52   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Jan Wieck
• 19:55   RE: Hardwired MAXBACKENDS limit could be history Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:56   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Jan Wieck
• 20:03   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Bruce Momjian
• 20:43   RE: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:13   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Tom Lane
• 21:17   Re: Permissions on CHECKPOINT Bruce Momjian
• 21:23   Re: postmaster -S will not print an error if pid file exists Tom Lane
• 21:36   RE: Permissions on CHECKPOINT Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:36   Re: Permissions on CHECKPOINT Bruce Momjian
• 22:06   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 22:13   Re: Permissions on CHECKPOINT Tom Lane
• 23:29   pg_dump -c database problem Rod Taylor
• 23:34   Re: Re: unixODBC again :-( Nick Gorham
• 23:38   Re: Re: unixODBC again :-( Nick Gorham
• 23:41   Which version? Sasha Pachev
• 23:49   Re: SourceForge & Postgres (fwd) Tim Perdue
• 23:50   Re: [GENERAL] MySQL -> Postgres dump converter Max Rudensky
• 23:50   Re: pg_dump -c database problem Philip Warner
• 23:53   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] Patrick Welche

27 January 2001

• 00:07   Re: Which version? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:25   Re: Re: SourceForge & Postgres (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 02:28   Re: PQprint Bruce Momjian
• 02:29   RE: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:43   Re: Hardwired MAXBACKENDS limit could be history Bruce Momjian
• 02:53   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
• 02:55   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
• 02:56   Re: This script will crash the connection Bruce Momjian
• 03:08   Re: new version of contrib-intarray Bruce Momjian
• 03:20   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Tom Lane
• 03:25   Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Tom Lane
• 03:31   Re: This script will crash the connection Tom Lane
• 03:40   Re: This script will crash the connection Bruce Momjian
• 03:43   Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 03:45   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Guenter
• 03:49   reorder INSERT firing in rules Bruce Momjian
• 04:07   Re: Re: SourceForge & Postgres (fwd) Tom Lane
• 04:21   Re: Re: MySQL has transactions Lincoln Yeoh
• 04:47   Re: Re: Re: MySQL has transactions Tom Lane
• 05:37   Re: new version of contrib-intarray Oleg Bartunov
• 05:39   Re: Which version? The Hermit Hacker
• 09:12   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone GB Clark II
• 10:29   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Oliver Elphick
• 10:36   Re: pg_dump -c database problem Philip Warner
• 11:10   Re: RPM: Contrib request. Lamar Owen
• 12:06   wrong query plan in 7.1beta3 Kovacs Zoltan
• 12:17   Re: Which version? Vince Vielhaber
• 12:17   Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors Peter Eisentraut
• 12:38   Re: wrong query plan in 7.1beta3 Peter Eisentraut
• 12:49   plan for running postmaster directly as NT service Fred Yankowski
• 13:46   Re: wrong query plan in 7.1beta3 Kovacs Zoltan
• 13:58   RE: plan for running postmaster directly as NT service Magnus Hagander
• 14:03   Re: plan for running postmaster directly as NT service Tom Lane
• 14:15   Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors Tom Lane
• 14:21   Re: wrong query plan in 7.1beta3 Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: Which version? Sasha Pachev
• 15:48   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Florent Guillaume
• 16:05   Re: Which version? Bruce Momjian
• 16:17   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
• 16:36   Re: PgAccess - small bug? Bruce Momjian
• 16:37   Re: Open 7.1 items Vadim Mikheev
• 16:47   Re: PgAccess - small bug? Bruce Momjian
• 17:10   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 17:16   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone The Hermit Hacker
• 17:24   Re: new version of contrib-intarray Tom Lane
• 17:29   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 17:51   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut
• 18:06   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 18:25   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 20:21   RE: Bug in FOREIGN KEY Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:35   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Florent Guillaume
• 21:49   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Oliver Elphick
• 22:08   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 23:37   Re: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL -> Postgres dump converter Hannu Krosing
• 23:52   Re: Open 7.1 items Philip Warner

28 January 2001

• 00:15   Re: Open 7.1 items Tom Lane
• 01:50   Re: Open 7.1 items Philip Warner
• 02:14   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 02:22   Re: Open 7.1 items Philip Warner
• 02:26   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 05:51   Re: Open 7.1 items Constantin S. Svintsoff
• 05:58   Re: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL -> Postgres dump converter Oliver Elphick
• 16:16   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 16:29   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 16:48   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Alessio Bragadini
• 16:51   Re: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL -> Postgres dump converter Max Rudensky
• 17:59   BLOB HOWTO?? Olivier PRENANT
• 18:55   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 19:07   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 19:25   Re: [ADMIN] Controlling user table creation Oliver Elphick
• 19:38   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Oliver Elphick
• 19:41   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 20:03   Re: [ADMIN] Controlling user table creation Peter Eisentraut
• 20:14   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut
• 20:26   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 20:47   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 20:53   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 20:58   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 20:59   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 21:02   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 21:05   Development of ISO19100 support in PG Franck Martin
• 21:09   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 21:11   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 21:18   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 21:20   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 21:30   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 21:44   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 21:47   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 21:54   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
• 23:00   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 23:11   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 23:40   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone The Hermit Hacker

29 January 2001

• 00:50   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 01:03   Beta4 available ... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:04   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
• 01:47   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 02:02   Re: Beta4 available ... Lamar Owen
• 02:11   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 02:24   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
• 02:36   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone The Hermit Hacker
• 02:40   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
• 02:43   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 02:44   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
• 02:59   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 03:57   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
• 04:29   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Oliver Elphick
• 04:32   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 04:44   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 04:47   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Dominic J. Eidson
• 05:04   Can PyGreSQL be updated? Oliver Elphick
• 05:24   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Oliver Elphick
• 05:36   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 05:36   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
• 05:43   7.1beta4 RPMs. Lamar Owen
• 05:46   scan.l simplifications Robert B. Easter
• 05:48   Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
• 06:10   Re: 7.1beta4 RPMs. Lamar Owen
• 06:41   Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report Pete Forman
• 08:57   Re: Talking about Solaris 7 Alexander Klimov
• 09:17   Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Olivier PRENANT
• 09:44   Emergency case: Postgres problems Jaruwan Laongmal
• 10:51   Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Martin A. Marques
• 11:15   Re: Talking about Solaris 7 Martin A. Marques
• 11:57   Re: Talking about Solaris 7 Alexander Klimov
• 12:05   PostgreSQL v7.1BETA4 Bundled and Available ... The Hermit Hacker
• 12:34   Re: new version of contrib-intarray Oleg Bartunov
• 12:44   Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors Tom Lane
• 12:55   Re: new version of contrib-intarray Tom Lane
• 13:02   Security hole in PL/pgSQL Jan Wieck
• 13:03   Re: scan.l simplifications Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.1BETA4 Bundled and Available ... Tom Lane
• 14:19   Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL Jan Wieck
• 14:21   Shouldn't this be an error? Vince Vielhaber
• 14:30   Re: Can PyGreSQL be updated? Bruce Momjian
• 14:37   Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Bruce Momjian
• 14:44   Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Bruce Momjian
• 14:44   Re: Shouldn't this be an error? Tom Lane
• 14:46   Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL KuroiNeko
• 14:51   Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:07   Re: Shouldn't this be an error? Bruce Momjian
• 15:13   AW: Shouldn't this be an error? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:18   Re: Open 7.1 items Tatsuo Ishii
• 15:18   Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL KuroiNeko
• 15:25   Re: Open 7.1 items Tatsuo Ishii
• 15:38   Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error? Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error? Bruce Momjian
• 15:48   Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Olivier PRENANT
• 15:50   Re: Open 7.1 items Tom Lane
• 15:53   Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL Dominic J. Eidson
• 15:57   Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Bruce Momjian
• 16:01   Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error? Bruce Momjian
• 16:05   Size of TODO.detail Bruce Momjian
• 16:13   Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL Jan Wieck
• 16:13   Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Jan Wieck
• 16:13   Re: [SQL] Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Jan Wieck
• 17:05   Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Jan Wieck
• 17:23   Re: Emergency case: Postgres problems Jan Wieck
• 17:31   Re: Size of TODO.detail Lamar Owen
• 17:35   Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors dom@idealx.com
• 18:01   Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL KuroiNeko
• 18:02   Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 18:10   Re: Open 7.1 items Larry Rosenman
• 18:38   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 18:41   Re: Open 7.1 items Larry Rosenman
• 19:04   Re: Open 7.1 items Bruce Momjian
• 19:07   7.1beta4 bug creating a certain table Kovacs Zoltan
• 19:55   Book enters second printing Bruce Momjian
• 20:33   Re: 7.1beta4 bug creating a certain table Tom Lane
• 20:46   NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres)) Karel Zak

30 January 2001

• 00:54   Like vs '=' m w
• 01:17   How to modify type in table? Jaruwan Laongmal
• 01:26   Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.1BETA4 Bundled and Available ... The Hermit Hacker
• 07:22   Re: [GENERAL] Trouble porting postgreSQL to WinNT Peter T Mount
• 08:49   Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Franck Martin
• 11:01   Re: Like vs '=' m w
• 11:10   grant privileges to a database Martin A. Marques
• 14:23   I'm off Jan Wieck
• 15:13   Re: 7.1beta4 bug creating a certain table Kovacs Zoltan
• 15:21   Re: Size of TODO.detail Bruce Momjian
• 15:28   Re: Re: [GENERAL] Trouble porting postgreSQL to WinNT Barry Lind
• 16:20   Re: 7.1beta4 bug creating a certain table Stephan Szabo
• 16:48   Like vs '=' bug with indexing m w
• 17:41   pg_shadow overusage Rod Taylor
• 18:07   Re: pg_shadow overusage Rod Taylor
• 18:13   Re: Re: [GENERAL] Trouble porting postgreSQL to WinNT Fred Yankowski
• 18:31   Re: Size of TODO.detail Lamar Owen
• 19:36   Re: Re: [GENERAL] Trouble porting postgreSQL to WinNT Peter Mount
• 20:34   Re: Open 7.1 items Peter Mount

31 January 2001

• 06:30   AW: Like vs '=' bug with indexing Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:20   RE: 7.1 question Magnus Hagander
• 11:07   AW: AW: Like vs '=' bug with indexing Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:18   Re: AW: AW: Like vs '=' bug with indexing m w
• 16:14   Re: grant privileges to a database Martin A. Marques
• 16:29   ERROR: "Database 'products', OID nnn, has disappeared from pg_database" Barnes, Sandy (Sandra)
• 16:53   Re: [GENERAL] Re: grant privileges to a database Michael Fork
• 17:44   Re: [GENERAL] Re: grant privileges to a database Martin A. Marques
• 18:43   SF company wants to hire pgsql hacker Bruce Momjian
• 20:20   Re: [GENERAL] Re: grant privileges to a database Martin A. Marques