Re: MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly)
Date
Msg-id 3A63D401.2B1A9348@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Anyone recall anything about that?  A quick search of my archives didn't
> turn up the discussion that I thought I remembered.

Hmm. Maybe now we know what you dream about at night ;)
                    - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is LockClassinfoForUpdate()'s mark4update a good idea?
Next
From: selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!