Re: [HACKERS] Recursion and SPI - Mailing list pgsql-patches
From | Ian Lance Taylor |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [HACKERS] Recursion and SPI |
Date | |
Msg-id | si4rzdzlyw.fsf@daffy.airs.com Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Re: [HACKERS] Recursion and SPI
|
List | pgsql-patches |
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes: > > Does the SPI interface support recursion? That is, can a function > > use SPI to make a query which involves calling another function which > > uses SPI? > > >From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/programmer/spi.htm : > > "SPI procedures are always called by some (upper) Executor and the SPI > manager > uses the Executor to run your queries. Other procedures may be called by the > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Executor running queries from your procedure." > > > The documentation suggests not, saying that if a function which uses > > SPI calls another function which uses SPI, it won't work, and calling > > that ``bad practice.'' > > >From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/programmer/spi-spiconnect.htm : > > "You may get SPI_ERROR_CONNECT error if SPI_connect is called from an > already > connected procedure - e.g. if you *directly call* one procedure from another > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > connected one. Actually, while the child procedure will be able to use SPI, > your parent procedure will not be able to continue to use SPI after the > child > returns (if SPI_finish is called by the child). It's bad practice." > > But you are able to run queries which call SPI functions. Thanks for the clarification. Approaching the current documentation from a position of ignorance, I find it ambiguous. I propose something along the lines of the following patch to clarify it. Thanks. (Alternatively, perhaps the code could maintain a count of nested calls to SPI_connect/SPI_finish. But I didn't try to write that patch.) Ian Index: spi.sgml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/spi.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 spi.sgml --- spi.sgml 2000/12/22 18:57:50 1.8 +++ spi.sgml 2001/01/05 22:10:13 @@ -34,10 +34,11 @@ </Para> <Para> -<Acronym>SPI</Acronym> procedures are always called by some (upper) -Executor and the <Acronym>SPI</Acronym> -manager uses the Executor to run your queries. Other procedures may be -called by the Executor running queries from your procedure. +Procedures which use <Acronym>SPI</Acronym> are called by the +Executor. The <Acronym>SPI</Acronym> calls recursively invoke the +Executor in turn to run queries. When the Executor is invoked +recursively, it may itself call procedures which may make +<Acronym>SPI</Acronym> calls. </Para> <Para> @@ -146,12 +147,17 @@ utility SPI functions may be called from un-connected procedures. </PARA> <PARA> - You may get <ReturnValue>SPI_ERROR_CONNECT</ReturnValue> error if <Function>SPI_connect</Function> is - called from an already connected procedure - e.g. if you directly call one - procedure from another connected one. Actually, while the child procedure - will be able to use SPI, your parent procedure will not be able to continue - to use SPI after the child returns (if <Function>SPI_finish</Function> is called by the child). - It's bad practice. + If your procedure is already connected, + <Function>SPI_connect</Function> will return an + <ReturnValue>SPI_ERROR_CONNECT</ReturnValue> error. Note that this + may happen if a procedure which has called + <Function>SPI_connect</Function> directly calls another procedure + which itself calls <Function>SPI_connect</Function>. While + recursive calls to the <Acronym>SPI</Acronym> manager are permitted + when an <Acronym>SPI</Acronym> query invokes another function which + uses <Acronym>SPI</Acronym>, directly nested calls to + <Function>SPI_connect</Function> and + <Function>SPI_finish</Function> are forbidden. </PARA> </REFSECT1> <REFSECT1 ID="R1-SPI-SPICONNECT-2">
pgsql-patches by date: